scholarly journals CIVIL LAW RESEARCHES OF REAL ESTATE CATEGORY IN RUSSIAN PRE-REVOLUTIONARY SCIENCE OF CIVIL LAW

Author(s):  
A. V. Ermakova ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
N.A. Pronina ◽  
T.N. Platunova ◽  
S.O. Kostyakova

The article raises the following topical problems currently inherent in the institution of real estate in theRussian Federation: the unsuccessful legal definition of a real estate object, enshrined in Art. 131 of the CivilCode of the Russian Federation; qualification of objects as immovable and, accordingly, delimitation of themfrom movable ones; the emergence of objects with a controversial legal regime; the need to move from themodel of “plurality” to the model of “unity” of real estate objects. Also, the authors of this article analyzea number of approaches aimed at resolving the above problems and the possible consequences (both positiveand negative) of their implementation in practice, put forward their views and offer their own solutionto these problems. A variant of the legalization of “disputable” objects is proposed by introducing the rightof construction into the civil law of the Russian Federation as a limited property right to use a land plot withthe extension of this right to everything that is being built on such a land plot. The examples of legislativeregulation of the right to build in the civil law of pre-revolutionary Russia are considered, the elements of theright to build in the current law of the Russian Federation are revealed.


TEME ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 065
Author(s):  
Milica Vučković ◽  
Miroslav Lazić

In this paper, the authors analyze the civil law liability of a mortgage debtor (mortgagor) in cases where the debtor breaches the obligation of treating the mortgaged real estate in compliance with the legal standard of acting with due diligence of “a good host” or “a good businessman,” and thus depreciates its value to the extent that jeopardizes the possibility of enforcing the claim. Given the accessory nature of mortgage which is aimed at securing the claim as the primary right, this form of civil liability and the corresponding rights of the mortgage creditor (mortgagee) are applicable before raising the issue of traditional civil law liability, which implies the maturity of the receivables and compensation for the damage sustained by the creditor. This form of civil liability may also be used preventively when there is a real risk of causing damage to the mortgagee. The relationship between civil law liability and the insurance of the mortgaged asset implies that they do not exclude but complement each other.


Author(s):  
Michał Kiedrzynek

The management of public real estate has been regulated in many legal acts, among which the Act of August 21, 1997 on real estate management plays the greatest role. The definitions contained in it are intended to explain the most important concepts related to the subject of this act. However, with regard to the definition of land real estate, we are dealing with a repetition of what was defined by the provisions of civil law. Such a situation raises justified interpretation doubts, which may have significant consequences in the application of this act. The existence of two definitions for the same object is undesirable and the Real Estate Management Act should be amended in this respect by including an appropriate reference to the provisions of civil law.


The present article touches upon the issue of negative obligation interpretation in civil law. The provisions of foreign civil legislature concerning negative obligations are reviewed in detail. The article gives a detailed analysis of main issues in the scientific literature concerning the legal nature of negative obligations: impossibility of negative obligations delays, impossibility of partial performance, impossibility of negative obligation termination because of failure to perform, impossibility to enforce debt assignment . The opportunity of negative obligation counter-performance is also stressed. It is concluded that negative obligation counter-performance is considered to be possible in case such obligations are interrelated. The author comes to the conclusion that the existence of counter-negative obligations is possible that are also exposed to counter-performance provided they are interrelated. The peculiarities of such negative obligations as distribution agreements and agency contracts are pointed out. The article goes on to say about the possibility of non-concurrence agreements conclusions under civil law of Ukraine. The author states that there are some legal obstacles to it: the correlation with the principle of freedom of contract, the limitations on active civil capacity, termination employment or contractual relationships termination with creditors. Domestic trial practice is given to illustrate the indicated positions. The author draws reader`s attention to the correlation of negative obligation with such definitions as «prohibition», « right restriction» and « waiver of the right». The author justifies that negative obligations can be considered neither as right restriction nor waiver of the right. Taking into account the fact that negative obligations imposes a prohibition on a debtor to commit certain actions but such a prohibition is provided by the agreement and works in favor of creditors it is considered to be a personal prohibition. The author also draws the line between negative obligations and negative servitude that is characterized by the burden of real estate as property rights and not by establishing the commitment in respect of a person.


Author(s):  
Ihor Binko ◽  

The article examines different views on the state registration of real property rights, in particular, indicates that such a process is interpreted by scholars in terms of administrative law as: a type of administrative proceedings or as an institution of law and legislation, or as an administrative service, and in some cases as the way the state performs administrative functions. It is noted that the state registration of rights to real estate especially ownership rights, can be an institution of administrative and civil law or be considered an interdisciplinary institution. In the part in which it is an institution of administrative law, the question arises, to the substantive, ie specifically administrative law or procedural, ie administrative procedural law, this institution can be attributed? Public - legal direction, as well as the legal properties that are endowed with state registration of rights allow us to speak about a certain uniqueness of its public law essence. It plays a special role in private legal relations as a legal mechanism for the emergence, transfer and termination of rights. It is noted that while civil law uses the main dispositive method of legal regulation of civil relations, the studied relations are regulated by the method of imperative prescriptions, in particular imperative are the rules of civil law, which establish the need for state registration, as well as administrative law of procedural nature. It is stated that as part of administrative law the institute under study belongs to its special part, which contains normative material and theoretical provisions governing a particular type of homogeneous social relations, including subsectors and legal institutions, service law, municipal law, administrative law, administrative procedural law.


2020 ◽  
pp. 160-168
Author(s):  
Olha BORTNYK

Legal relations concerning spontaneous construction are a special construction, which is not a classic example of civil relations, which are characterized by legal equality, free will, property independence of their participants, which are collectively considered the fundamental foundations of civil law. The study identifies and reveals the components of the basis for the acquisition of ownership of unauthorized construction, including: ownership can be recognized as a person for the property, which must have certain characteristics, necessary and integral features (characteristics); such property, by its legal nature, must belong to immovable property; construction must be under construction or already built; illegality (illegality) of such construction; constructed real estate or property that is under construction is located on a land plot that has not been allocated for this purpose, property is built or is being built with significant violations of applicable building codes and regulations, etc. Provisions on the understanding of each of the components of the basis for the acquisition of ownership of unauthorized construction are disclosed. Peculiarities of application of norms on unauthorized construction depending on the will of the owner of the land plot on which the unauthorized construction was carried out are stated, as well as attention is paid to the possibility of acquiring ownership of unauthorized construction by a person who did not carry out construction or the land owner. Opinions were expressed regarding the referral of the issue of acquiring the right of ownership for unauthorized construction to judicial jurisdiction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-97
Author(s):  
Nargiza Ashurova

This article critically analyses legislative acts concerning the legal regime of real estate of the Republic of Uzbekistan and reviews the improvement of the legal status of real estate. In particular, on the basis of the legal characteristic of immovable property, peculiar aspects of the stay (finding) of immovable property in civil circulation, the priority areas of development of the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan are moving forward (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Code).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document