scholarly journals Evaluation of bracket failure in relation to different factors in patients experiencing comprehensive orthodontic treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
Naif A. Bindayel ◽  
◽  
Abdulrahman Alwadei ◽  
Naif Almosa ◽  
Wajdy Aasser ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752095008
Author(s):  
Gaurav Singh ◽  
Utsav Singh Gurung ◽  
Madan Mishra ◽  
Amit Gaur

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and share our experience with the surgery first approach (SFA) for correction of skeletal malocclusion. Methods: After consultation with the department of orthodontics, 45 patients with skeletal malocclusions suitable to undergo SFA were enrolled in this study (14 bimaxillary protrusion and 31 skeletal class III malocclusion). Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, subapical osteotomy, and genioplasty were performed as required. After a healing period of 2 weeks, postoperative orthodontic treatment was started to achieve the final occlusion. Results: The mean duration of postoperative orthodontic treatment was 15.2 months, which is much shorter than the conventional orthodontic first approach (OFA) where presurgical orthodontic duration alone takes 12-24 months according to an individual. In the bimaxillary protrusion group, it was 18 months, which was significantly longer than for the other group ( P < .05). Conclusions: SFA offers an efficient alternative to conventional OFA with shorter total treatment duration, immediate marked improvement in facial profile, reduced biological costs, and similar operative stability. However, it comes at the cost of heightened challenges regarding case selection, accurate prediction, and surgical precision. With a joint venture between skilled and experienced surgeons and orthodontists, the outcome can be very promising.


2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Stasinopoulos ◽  
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou ◽  
Frank Kirsch ◽  
Nikolaos Daratsianos ◽  
Andreas Jäger ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare the failure pattern of four different bracket types and to assess its effect on treatment duration. Materials and Methods: A total of 78 white patients (28 male, 50 female) with a mean age of 12.6 years were included in this retrospective cohort study and treated for a mean period of 30.6 months. The patients were treated in a private practice with stainless steel conventionally ligated brackets, ceramic conventionally ligated brackets, stainless steel self-ligating brackets, or nickel-free self-ligating brackets. The loss of at least one bracket during the course of treatment was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards survival analyses and generalized linear regression. Results: The overall bracket failure rate at the tooth level was 14.1% (217 brackets), with significant differences according to tooth type (between 8.0%–23.4%) and bracket type (between 11.2%–20.0%). After taking confounders into account, patients treated with ceramic brackets lost more brackets (hazard ratio = 1.62; 95% confidence interval = 1.14–2.29; P = .007) than patients with stainless steel brackets. On average, treatment time increased by 0.6 months (95% confidence interval = 0.21–1.05; P = .004) for each additional failed bracket. Conclusions: Bracket failure was more often observed with ceramic brackets and was associated with increased treatment duration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1161
Author(s):  
Amrit K. Kamboj ◽  
Amandeep Gujral ◽  
Elida Voth ◽  
Daniel Penrice ◽  
Jessica McGoldrick ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fustolo-Gunnink ◽  
R. Vlug ◽  
V. Smits-Wintjens ◽  
E. Heckman ◽  
A. Te Pas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document