FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INTEGRATION AND INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY: COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS FOR EMEGING MARKET ECONOMIES

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (ICMEB17) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Ayşegül GÜLLÜ ◽  
Zühal KURUL
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Cointegration Analysis ◽  
Market Economies ◽  
International Financial Integration

Financial Integrational Effects on Macroeconomic Instability in India

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-166
Author(s):  
Niranjan R.
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Trade Openness ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Financial Openness ◽  
Vector Error Correction ◽  
Vector Error ◽  
International Financial Integration ◽  
Macroeconomic Instability ◽  
Negative Effect

The nexus between international financial integration and economic growth continues to be one of the most debated issues among macroeconomists, and these debates often raise several issues from the theoretical and policy perspectives. Financial integration can catalyse financial development, improve governance and impose discipline on macro-policies. However, in the absence of a basic pre-existing level of supporting conditions, financial integration can aggravate instability (Khadraoui, 2010). In addition, economic theory suggests that increased financial openness intensifies macroeconomic instability. This article investigates the financial integrational effects on macroeconomic instability in terms of output, consumption and investment volatility by employing the vector error correction model (VECM) with empirically reasonably parameters for an emerging economy, India, for the period 1989–2014. From the results, it is evident that financial openness has had a significant effect on output, consumption and investment volatility. Financial development has had a statistically significant negative effect on output, consumption and investment volatility. Similarly, trade openness and terms of trade significantly influence output, consumption and investment volatility. JEL Classification: F36, F41, F43, E32

scholarly journals Examining the relationship between finance, institutions and economic growth: evidence from the ASEAN economies

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazwan Haini
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Financial Markets ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Asean Economic Community ◽  
Dynamic Panel Estimator

AbstractThis study investigates the role of financial and institutional development on economic growth in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) economies from 1995 to 2017 using a dynamic panel estimator. Financial development is instrumental in promoting economic growth; however, the effect of financial institutions and financial markets can differ. In recent years, the ASEAN economies have launched financial and institutional integration initiatives towards the goal of an integrated ASEAN Economic Community, which can have a profound impact on economic growth. The estimated results show that financial institutions are positive and significant towards economic growth, while financial markets are insignificant. Equally important, institutional quality plays a significant and positive role in economic growth. More interestingly, the study finds that institutional development is complementary to financial institutions and markets. Member states should emphasise on further financial integration across the ASEAN economies, allowing for the development of financial institutions and markets alongside improvements in institutional quality to increase the effectiveness of financial development.

scholarly journals FINANCE AND INEQUALITY: HOW DOES GLOBALIZATION CHANGE THEIR RELATIONSHIP?

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1091-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Kunieda ◽  
Keisuke Okada ◽  
Akihisa Shibata
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Financial Market ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
World Market ◽  
Dynamic Panel Data ◽  
International Financial Integration ◽  
The World ◽  
Country Analysis ◽  
Using Data

This research demonstrates that international financial integration changes the way in which financial development affects inequality within a country. Specifically, both cross-country analysis and dynamic panel data analysis using data collected from more than 100 countries provide evidence indicating that if the financial market of a country is strongly closed to the world market, financial development narrows inequality within that country, whereas if the financial market of a country is strongly open to the world market, financial development widens inequality within that country. Our theoretical framework provides a possible explanation for our empirical findings.

scholarly journals How Does International Financial Integration Really Affect Post-Transition Countries' Growth? Empirical evidence from the CEE-10 countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-136
Author(s):  
Mehmed Ganić ◽  
Mahir Hrnjić
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Southeastern Europe ◽  
Panel Unit Root Tests ◽  
Financial Openness ◽  
Dynamic Panel ◽  
Fdi Inflows ◽  
Long Run ◽  
International Financial Integration ◽  
Dynamic Panel Analysis

Abstract This paper seeks to empirically explore how an international financial integration influences a country’s GDP growth. The long run relationship is tested by PMG estimator for the sample of ten EU countries from Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CEE-10 countries) between 1995 and 2017. Prior to the conducting of dynamic panel analysis based on PMG estimators, several panel unit root tests were conducted, as well as panel co integration tests. The findings offer mixed impact financial integration on growth. Among the measures of financial integration, growth of the CEE-10 countries is mostly driven in the long run by FDI inflows as well as remittances and financial openness. On the contrary, the study suggests a reversal relationship between growth and financial integration measured by Gross Foreign Assets and Liabilities in percentages of GDP. It might be explained with a fact that CEE-10 countries have not yet reached a certain level of financial development in order to benefit from financial integration. The study concludes that international financial integration does not per se enhance economic growth and country’s growth in the CEE-10 countries can be reached at a higher level of financial integration, further increase their financial openness and financial development.

The Nexus between Financial Development and Human Development: The Case of Developing Countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Bilgehan Tekin
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Cointegration Analysis ◽  
Annual Data ◽  
Causality Analysis ◽  
Development Index ◽  
Development Levels ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of this study to examine the relationship between financial development and human development in the health and welfare dimensions of developing countries. This study aims to determine whether the financial developments of the countries have an effect on the basic human development of the individuals and whether human development indicators have an impact on financial development. In this study, the relationship between financial development and human development has been tried to be revealed by using data obtained from developing countries. Financial development levels of the countries were measured with the developed financial development index. The index is calculated by using M3 / GDP, private sector loans / GDP and loans to banks from private sector / GDP ratios. The human development index is calculated by considering various health indicators and GNP per capita. The data includes annual data for the period 1970-2016. Pedroni and Kao cointegration analysis and Dumitrescu & Hurlin panel causality analysis were performed in the study. According to the results of the study, the cointegration relationship was determined between the two variables. There is also a two-way causality between the variables.

scholarly journals Sustainable Utilization of Financial and Institutional Resources in Reducing Income Inequality and Poverty

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1038
Author(s):  
Atta Ullah ◽  
Zhao Kui ◽  
Saif Ullah ◽  
Chen Pinglu ◽  
Saba Khan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Electronic Government ◽  
Sustainable Utilization ◽  
One Belt One Road ◽  
Institutional Resources ◽  
Belt And Road

This study aims to determine the role of globalization, electronic government, financial development, concerning the moderation of institutional quality in reducing income inequality and poverty in One Belt One Road countries. The electronic government and regional integration of the economies of the One Belt One Road countries has increased globalization and can play a vital role in reducing income inequality and poverty. However, this globalization and digital transformation of government systems can only be beneficial in the presence of good institutional quality. The sample includes 64 One Belt One Road countries from 2003 to 2018. We employed a two-step system generalized method of moment (Sys-GMM) and a robustness check through Driscoll–Kraay standard errors regression. Our findings show that globalization, economic growth, e-government development, government expenditure, and inflation have a statistically significant and negative impact on income inequality and are key to eradicating income inequality and poverty. On the other hand, financial development, gross capital formation, and population size positively influence income inequality, which causes an increase in poverty and income inequality as financial development and population levels increase. Moderating variable institutional quality also positively impacts income inequality, which means that institutional quality in Belt and Road Countries is weak, as they are mostly developing countries that need to improve their systems. Moreover, the marginal effect also revealed that institutional quality has a corrective effect on the factors’ relationship with income inequality. Our findings endorse and conclude that globalization and e-government development improve economic growth and eradicate poverty and income inequality by boosting digitalization, investments, job creation, and wage increases for semi-skilled and unskilled human capital in Belt and Road countries. The sustainable utilization of financial and institutional resources plays a vital role in reducing income inequality and poverty in Belt and Road countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document