scholarly journals Agency and Structure in Social Mobility in the Light of Individualization: Empirical Research Review

Author(s):  
Polina Erofeeva
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-34
Author(s):  
Hajnalka Fényes

In this paper, the vertical segregation in tertiary education is investigated by gender (the percentage of boys and girls in Bachelor’s and Master’s training is compared) first. Then the differences in social mobility are examined by gender in higher education. Finally, the acquired cultural capital of students is compared by gender. The research is based on new quantitative empirical research in a borderland Central - Eastern - European region, called “Partium”. Our results show that the vertical segregation at the two stages of tertiary education can not be detected, and the advantage of girls in participation is even larger in Master’s training than in Bachelor’s training in the “Partium” region. Furthermore, girls’ social mobility is higher at both stages of the training (but in Master’s training their advantage is slightly smaller). Finally, the girls’ acquired cultural capital is superior to the boys’ in accordance with the literature (but boys are in the lead in using ICT). Overall, our results show that boys are in a disadvantageous situation in tertiary education concerning several aspects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polyxeni Kechagia ◽  
Theodore Metaxas

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh

One of the most dramatic findings of the contemporary scholarship on the urban poor has been the extent to which this population has been affected by the departure of manufacturing, and industrial, employment from inner city areas. The effects of this have included the sharp rise in unemployment and the increase in the number of individuals on welfare rolls. Although writers such as Charles Murray and Lawrence Mead have argued that with the growth, and entrenchment, of welfare an attitude of “dependency” has arisen, more recent empirical research does not substantiate these claims of dependency and “shiftlessness” among the urban poor; these latter studies have raised more general questions concerning individual employment histories including attempts to reenter positions of stable and meaningful employment. The article addresses such questions by examining the responses of 27 black males, the majority of whom were out of work and/or receiving public assistance, to open-ended questions concerning their experiences in the labor force and their assesments of the contemporary structure of social mobility. In brief, the conclusions reached in the examination of these interviews point to the numerous forces—racial, spatial, and political as well as strictly economic—which have come into play in shaping their past and present.


1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Mccullough

The theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between prayer and health is critically reviewed. Although empirical research partially confirms that prayer promotes a variety of health outcomes, the empirical literature is characterized by weak methodologies that may contribute to the inconsistency of some findings. Recommendations are made for improving the quality of prayer and health research. An agenda for further empirical investigation of the relationship between prayer and health is proposed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Deakin ◽  
Marina Gastaud ◽  
Maria Lucia Tiellet Nunes

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Orton

This article contributes to debates about agency (meaning the behaviour of individuals) and structure, by drawing on empirical research into personal debt. Consideration of debt allows for debate about agency and structure beyond the narrow confines of welfare, and for the examination of agency in relation to citizens at different points in the broader socio-economic structure, not solely poor people. Based on the research findings, themselves grounded in interviewees' experience, the question of why two people in the same material circumstances will have different experiences becomes reframed as why two people whose exercise of agency is the same, face very different outcomes? It is argued that while the research supports a ‘both-and’ rather than ‘either-or’ approach to understanding agency and structure, a ‘both-and’ approach still does not fully capture the experience of interviewees. The key point is that the exercise of agency is overlaid onto structural inequality, and it is understanding the exercise of ‘agency within structure’ that is critical.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 123003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleem H Ali ◽  
Jose A Puppim de Oliveira

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document