scholarly journals Parametric System Identification using Closed loop Step Response

Author(s):  
A. Sumalatha ◽  
A. Bhujanga Rao
2012 ◽  
Vol 452-453 ◽  
pp. 364-368
Author(s):  
Jian Hu Jiang ◽  
Chao Wu ◽  
Ting Bu

In this paper, an open-loop frequency domain analysis based on system identification is introduced. Using model identification tools in Matlab, the open-loop frequency domain characteristic could be derived accurately with the open-loop step response. Then, the closed-loop regulator could be designed with the open-loop frequency domain characteristic to fulfill the steady and dynamic requirements. This method is suitable for most of the systems. An example of Buck converter is proposed to represent the analysis process. Simulation model is built in Matlab software, and some factors which affect the precision of model identification and frequency domain analysis are taken into consideration. Finally, both open- and closed-loop experimental results verify the feasibility of the proposed scheme.


2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (8) ◽  
pp. 882-888
Author(s):  
Shiro Masuda ◽  
Jongho Park ◽  
Yoshihiro Matsui

2001 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Chen ◽  
Yossi Chait ◽  
C. V. Hollot

Reset controllers consist of two parts—a linear compensator and a reset element. The linear compensator is designed, in the usual ways, to meet all closed-loop performance specifications while relaxing the overshoot constraint. Then, the reset element is chosen to meet this remaining step-response specification. In this paper, we consider the case when such linear compensation results in a second-order (loop) transfer function and where a first-order reset element (FORE) is employed. We analyze the closed-loop reset control system addressing performance issues such as stability, steady-state response, and transient performance.


Author(s):  
Muditha K. M. Dassanayake ◽  
Masaomi Tsutsumi

In this paper, the motion performances of the two rotary tables which are driven by roller gear cam and direct drive motor are measured and compared. The table with roller gear cam was controlled in semi-closed loop and full-closed loop methods while the other was controlled only in full-closed loop method. In the measurements, the positioning accuracy and repeatability, rotational fluctuation, frequency response, step response and etc of the systems were measured. All these tests were carried out without any kind of compensation methods such as pitch error or cogging torque compensation etc. Three rotary encoders for rotary table with roller gear cam and one rotary encoder for rotary table with direct drive motor were used for measurements. Furthermore, the simulations were carried out by mathematical models and the results were compared with measured results. The comparison shows that the measured and simulated results have a good agreement. From the simulation results, the friction torque was identified and also compared. The results imply that though both the tables show high performances, the performances of the rotary table driven by roller gear cam are comparatively higher than that of rotary table driven by direct drive motor.


1997 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1547-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Van den Hof

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document