scholarly journals Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel in combination with prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel chemotherapy in daily clinical practice. Results of a Russian multicenter prospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ya. Alekseev ◽  
I. M. Shevchuk
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Lymphatic System ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Site Conditions ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Granulocytic Colony

Materials and methods. From September 19, 2016 to December 27, 2019, 104 patients received cabazitaxel plus prednisone for a maximum of 10 cycles or disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity, or patient request to stop treatment. Adverse events occurring during treatment, including use of granulocytic colony stimulating factors, were collected. Prostate specific antigen response, objective tumor response (RECIST), progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed. Treatment period was followed by a follow-up period of 82.0 (36.0–117.0) weeks. Results. 104 patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma were enrolled and treated. All were Caucasian with a median age of 66 (range 46.0–86.0) years and a median BMI-Score of 26.8 (18.7–43.3) kg/m2. Most patients (57/104, 54.8 %) were ECOG 1. At the time of prostate cancer diagnosis, 63/104 (60.6 %) patients had metastatic disease. The median duration of therapy was 14.5 (0.1–39.0) weeks and the median number of cycles cabazitaxel was 5; 30 (28.8 %) patients received 10 cycles of treatment. Granulocytic colony stimulating factors was received by 52 (50.0 %) patients (prophylactic, n = 31; curative, n = 21). Overall, 102/104 (98.08 %) patients reported at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), 21/104 (20.19 %) grade ³III TEAEs and 12/104 (11.54 %) serious adverse events. Most TEAEs resolved but 9/104 patients discontinued treatment due to TEAE. Most common TEAEs were related to gastrointestinal system disorders (46/104 (44.23 %) patients, mainly nausea n = 40); blood and lymphatic system disorders (44 (42.31 %) patients, mainly leukopenia n = 22, anemia n = 15, neutropenia n = 11) and general disorders/administration site conditions (22 (21.15 %) patients; mainly asthenia n = 21). Main grade ³III adverse events were related to blood and lymphatic system disorders (11 (10.58 %), including one case of febrile neutropenia), general disorders/administration site conditions (6 (5.77 %), mainly asthenia) and cardiac disorders in 2 (1.92 %) patients. A prostate specific antigen decline of at least 50 % was observed in 23 out of 31 patients with evaluable prostate specific antigen measurements. The objective tumor response was observed in 29 (27.9 %) patients, including 7 (6,7 %) with complete response and 22 (21.2 %) with partial response. Treatment was completed as initially planned in 41/104 (39.4 %) patients, and 61/104 (58.7 %) reached the last follow-up visit. At the last follow-up visit, median overall survival was not reached due to a low number of events. Median progression-free survival at the end of treatment visit was 6.29 (5.1–10.45) months and reached 10.13 (5.55–19.27) months at the last follow-up visit. There was no reported death related to treatment of cabazitaxel during the period of treatment and follow-up period. Conclusion. This prospective, multi-center, national observational, non-interventional register conducted in patients with mCRPC in Russian Federation suggests that cabazitaxel is effective with a manageable safety profile.

Prostate-specific antigen to determine progression-free survival after radiation therapy for localized carcinoma of prostate

Urology ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Schellhammer ◽  
Anas M. El-Mahdi ◽  
George L. Wright ◽  
Paul Kolm ◽  
Ronda Ragle
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

scholarly journals Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (26) ◽  
pp. 3032-3041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Marc Buyse ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Philip W. Kantoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
End Point

PURPOSE Recently, we have shown that metastasis-free survival is a strong surrogate for overall survival (OS) in men with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer and can accelerate the evaluation of new (neo)adjuvant therapies. Event-free survival (EFS), an earlier prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based composite end point, may further expedite trial completion. METHODS EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of first evidence of disease recurrence, including biochemical failure, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, or was censored at the date of last PSA assessment. Individual patient data from trials within the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate–ICECaP–database with evaluable PSA and disease follow-up data were analyzed. We evaluated the surrogacy of EFS for OS using a 2-stage meta-analytic validation model by determining the correlation of EFS with OS (patient level) and the correlation of treatment effects (hazard ratios [HRs]) on both EFS and OS (trial level). A clinically relevant surrogacy was defined a priori as an R2 ≥ 0.7. RESULTS Data for 10,350 patients were analyzed from 15 radiation therapy–based trials enrolled from 1987 to 2011 with a median follow-up of 10 years. At the patient level, the correlation of EFS with OS was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.44) as measured by Kendall’s tau from a copula model. At the trial level, the R2 was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.60) from the weighted linear regression of log(HR)-OS on log(HR)-EFS. CONCLUSION EFS is a weak surrogate for OS and is not suitable for use as an intermediate clinical end point to substitute for OS to accelerate phase III (neo)adjuvant trials of prostate cancer therapies for primary radiation therapy–based trials.

Talactoferrin alfa may prolong progression-free survival in advanced renal carcinoma patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4600-4600 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Srinivas ◽  
W. M. Stadler ◽  
R. Bukowski ◽  
R. Figlin ◽  
T. Hayes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Results

4600 Background: Talactoferrin alfa (formerly known as recombinant human lactoferrin, rhLF) is a novel immunomodulatory 80 kD protein with demonstrated oral anti-tumor properties in animal models, and promising early results in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Phase 1/2 trials. Methods: An open label Phase 2 study of Talactoferrin Oral Solution at 1.5 g talactoferrin alfa b.i.d. given up to a maximum of 4 cycles of 12 weeks on, 2 weeks off was conducted at 6 sites. Eligibility included predominantly clear cell histology, failure of at least one prior systemic therapy, tumor progression within the prior 9 months, a performance status of <2 (ECOG) and adequate organ function. The primary endpoints were the incidence of 14-week progression-free survival (PFS) and overall tumor response (by RECIST). The statistical plan specified an objective of 12.5% response rate or a progression-free survival rate of ≥40% at 14 weeks. Secondary endpoints included median PFS and median overall survival (OS). Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients (41%) were considered low risk and twenty-six (59%) considered intermediate risk based on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. There were no talactoferrin-related Grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. The most common related grade 1 or 2 adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms. There was one unconfirmed tumor response and the 14-week PFS was 55%. The median PFS was 21 weeks (46 weeks and 9.4 weeks in the patients with low and intermediate risk prognostic factors, respectively). The median OS has not yet been reached. Conclusions: Talactoferrin alfa is well tolerated. The 14-week PFS met the pre-specified criteria for success (>40%). Due to the heterogeneity of tumor biology of RCC, any further evaluation of talactoferrin in this population should be in a larger randomized trial. [Table: see text]

Cetuximab and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with initially “nonresectable” colorectal (CRC) liver metastases: Long-term follow-up of the CELIM trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3538-3538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Folprecht ◽  
Thomas Gruenberger ◽  
Wolf Bechstein ◽  
Hans-Rudolf Raab ◽  
Juergen Weitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

3538 Background: CRC liver metastases can be resected after downsizing with intensive chemotherapy schedules, with a strong correlation between the response and resection rates. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy has been shown to increase the rates of tumor response and resection of liver metastases. (Van Cutsem et al, JCO 2011). Methods: Patients (pts) with technically non-resectable and/or with > 4 liver metastases were randomized to treatment with FOLFOX/cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (arm B) and evaluated regarding resectability every 2 months. Resection was offered to all patients who became resectable during the study. K-ras and b-raf status were retrospectively evaluated. Data on tumor response and resection were reported earlier (Folprecht et al, Lancet Oncol 2010). Overall and progression free survival were analyzed in December 2012. Results: Between Dec 2004 and March 2008, 56 pts were randomized to arm A, 55 to arm B. For the current analysis, 109 pts were evaluable for overall survival (OS), and 106 patients for PFS. The median OS was 35.7 [95% CI: 27.2-44.2] months (arm A: 35.8 [28.1-43.6], arm B: 29.0 [16.0-41.9], HR 1.03 [0.66-1.61], p=0.9). The median PFS was 10.8 [9.3-12.2] months (Arm A: 11.2 [7.2-15.3], Arm B: 10.5 [8.9-12.2], HR 1.18 [0.79-1.74], p=0.4). Patients with R0 resection had a better OS (median: 53.9 [35.9-71.9] mo) than patients without R0 resection (27.3 [21.1-33.4] mo, p=0.002) and a better PFS (median 15.4 [11.4-19.5] and 8.9 [6.7-11.1] mo in R0 resected and not R0 resected pts, p<0.001). The 5 year survival in R0 resected patients is 46.2% [29.5-62.9%]. Conclusions: This study confirmed a favourable long term survival of patients with initially “nonresectable” CRC liver metastases treated in a multidisciplinary approach of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab and subsequent metastasectomy in pts who became resectable. Clinical trial information: NCT00153998. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Impact of Early Switching to Nilotinib As Second Line TKI in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Were Intolerant to, Suboptimal to and Failed Imatinib: The Thai Multi-Centered Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267
Author(s):  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction : To date, the ELN recommendation and NCCN guidelines are the principle mile stones to follow up the treatment response and to make the decision of TKIs switching. However, in real life practice, many factors influence changing the real switching date from the date had an indication. This study aims to analyze the impact of early switching to second line TKI, nilotinib, in real life practice, for the CML patients who failed, had sub-optimal response or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods : This prospective study was conducted through 7 medical centers in Thailand between 1st of September 2009 and 31st of August 2011. Adult CML patients of age ≥ 18 years old, in chronic and accelerated phase, who had failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib, based on ELN 2009 guideline, were included and were eligible with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Prospective data collection for 24 months of each patient was performed. The main objective was to identify the impact of early switching to nilotinib on major molecular response (MMR). The other objectives were to observe the efficacy of nilotinib including overall survival, progression free survival and the safety. The survival results were presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves. For the comparison of the treatment groups, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the corresponding log-rank test for equality of survivor functions across treatment group was applied. Results : The final 108 cases were analysed. The median age was 47 (17-79) years with the proportion of male to female of 1.4:1 respectively. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). The median duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching was 3.1 months (0-62.8 months) with 50% changing less than 3 months, 26.9% between 3 months and 12 months, and 23.1% changing longer than 12 months. The indication of switching included 63.6% failure to imatinib, 29% intolerance to imatinib and 7.4% suboptimal to imatinib. On the nilotinib switching, 70.4% completed 24 months follow-up, and 29.6% discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Evaluation was made every 3 months based on 2009 ELN recommendation. At 3 months, 57%, 20%, and 8% of the patients achieved CHR, CCyR and MMR, respectively. Those who did not achieve CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR. All CML achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had better outcome than imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance groups. A preliminary analysis of BCR-ABL mutation was performed on 90 cases, and mutations were found on 21 cases. Two of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation. There was one case with initial G250E mutation developing T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, one case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year progression-free survival and were 98.9% and 96.9% (figure 1 and 2), respectively. The interquatile analysis was done to identify the groups of cumulative MMR according to the duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching to nilotinib. The patients who switched to nilotinib within 12 months after date of indication could have a greater chance to achieved MMR than those who switched treatment later than 12 months (p(log-rank) = 0.002) (figure 3). Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events, However, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%) and leucopenia (4%), and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Conclusions : Nilotinib, as a second line treatment showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. However, the patients will have a greater chance to achieve MMR if they switched to nilotinib within 12 months after the date of indication for changing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Significance of normal serum prostate-specific antigen in the follow-up period after definitive radiation therapy for prostatic cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Zelefsky ◽  
S A Leibel ◽  
K E Wallner ◽  
W F Whitmore ◽  
Z Fuks
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostatic Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Normal Serum ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Psa Relapse

PURPOSE To determine the prognostic significance of a normal serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in patients with prostatic cancer with long-term follow-up evaluation after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS PSA information was available in 403 patients (38%) who were treated with pelvic lymph node dissection and retropubic radioactive iodine-125 implantation. One hundred eighty-two patients had a normal serum PSA level (< or = 4.0 ng/mL) the first time this test was conducted during the follow-up period, designated PSA-1. RESULTS Among patients with PSA-1 values < or = 1.0 ng/mL, the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rate was 85% compared with 27%, respectively, among those with PSA values in the higher range of normal (P < .00001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only a PSA-1 value greater than 1.0 to < or 4.0 (P < .00001) and grade II/III histology (P = .009) had a negative impact on continued PSA relapse-free survival. The only independent variable identified by a multivariate analysis to affect local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was a PSA-1 value greater than 1.0 to < or = 4.0 ng/mL (P < .004), while high-grade histology (P < .0001) and local failure (P < .001) were the only significant variables to affect distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). CONCLUSION Patients with PSA values < or = 1.0 ng/mL are significantly less likely to have a subsequent relapse after therapy than those with levels greater than 1.0 to < or = 4.0 ng/mL. Continuously maintained PSA levels of < or = 1.0 ng/mL after treatment may serve as an end point for early evaluation of the efficacy of experimental radiotherapy protocols in prostate cancer.

QTWIST analysis in the RECOURSE trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 698-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Nadia Amellal ◽  
Stéphanie Cadour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Health State ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Utility Coefficient ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Overall Survival Benefit

698 Background: RECOURSE showed that treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil in patients in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer was associated with significantly improved survival vs placebo. As quality of life (QoL) was not captured in the trial, other methods were used to evaluate potential impact on QoL. Methods: We used the QTWIST method, i.e. quality-adjusted TWIST (time without symptoms of disease or toxicity), to explore survival adjusted for QoL with trifluridine/tipiracil vs placebo in the RECOURSE population. QTWIST incorporates a trade-off between time spent with treatment-related adverse events versus improvement in progression-free survival, and combines an estimate of the mean duration of each health state (TOX, TWIST, and RELAPSE [REL]), weighted by a utility coefficient, into a global QTWIST score. TOX represents time with grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events that are expected to impact QoL (i.e. nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue/asthenia, anorexia, febrile neutropenia) before progression, TWIST represents time without symptoms or toxicity; and REL represents time from progression (as defined in the RECOURSE trial) until death. We applied a utility coefficient of 1 for TWIST and values of 0.5 for TOX and REL. A sensitivity analysis varied the utility coefficients for TOX and REL from 0 to 1. Results: 798 pts (533 trifluridine/tipiracil vs 265 placebo) were included with median follow-up time of 11.8 mo. The between-group difference in the global QTWIST score was 1.5 mo (95% CI, 1.49–1.52) in favor of trifluridine/tipiracil. Using varying utility coefficients for TOX and REL from 0 to 1 as a sensitivity analysis, the between-group difference in the global QTWIST score ranged from 1.3 to 1.7 mo, always in favor of trifluridine/tipiracil. Conclusions: The median overall survival benefit observed with trifluridine/tipiracil vs placebo in RECOURSE was 1.8 months. Consistently, patients' QoL as evaluated by QTWIST showed that quality-adjusted survival with Lonsurf is significantly improved by 1.5 months vs placebo. Clinical trial information: NCT01607957. [Table: see text]

Updated analysis of progression-free survival with first subsequent therapy (PFS2) and safety in the SPARTAN study of apalutamide (APA) in patients (pts) with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jay Small ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Boris A. Hadaschik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Significant Benefit ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival

144 Background: In the phase 3 SPARTAN study, compared with placebo (PBO), APA, a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, decreased the risk of distant metastasis or death by 72% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28; p < 0.0001) in men with high-risk nmCRPC. After 1 year of additional follow-up, PFS2 and safety were reevaluated to ensure maintenance of benefit against potential harm. Methods: Pts with nmCRPC and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤ 10 mos were randomized 2:1 to APA (240 mg QD) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or PBO + ADT. All pts who developed distant metastasis, determined by blinded independent central review, were eligible to receive subsequent therapy including open-label treatment with abiraterone acetate + prednisone, provided by the sponsor. The exploratory PFS2 end point (time from randomization to disease progression on subsequent anticancer therapy or death) was evaluated, as was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Median treatment duration with APA was 25.7 mos; with PBO, 11.5 mos (original analysis, mos: APA, 19.2; PBO, 11.2). Pts randomized to APA continued to show significant benefit in PFS2 (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.39-0.63; p < 0.0001) vs PBO (APA median time to PFS2 not reached vs PBO 39.3 mos). At a median follow-up of 32 mos, 51.3% of pts receiving APA, 8% of the 75 pts who crossed over from PBO to APA, and 99.7% of remaining PBO pts had discontinued study treatment. Rates of discontinuations due to progressive disease and AEs were 27.3% and 12.7%, respectively, in the APA group and 73.4% and 8.4% in the PBO group. There was no substantial change in the incidence of TEAEs in the APA group at the 1-year update. With regard to drug specific TEAEs, there were no grade 4 or 5 events; grade 3 TEAEs consisted of rash, 5.2%; falls, 2.4%; fractures, 3.1%; hypothyroidism, 0%; and seizures, 0%. Conclusions: APA was previously shown to result in an improvement in metastasis-free survival and symptomatic progression. With a median APA treatment duration of 25.7 mos, APA continues to show significant benefit in PFS2, and its safety profile remains unchanged. Clinical trial information: NCT01946204.

Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Estramustine and Carboplatin in Men With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457
Author(s):  
KATSUYA HIKITA ◽  
MASASHI HONDA ◽  
RYUTARO SHIMIZU ◽  
SHOGO TERAOKA ◽  
BUNYA KAWAMOTO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant

Background: The efficacy of docetaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine was evaluated in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel at 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/ml/min) was administered on day 1. Patients received oral estramustine at 626.8 mg/day throughout the treatment protocol. Patients were evaluated for response, with treatment continued until cancer progression or onset of severe adverse events. Results: Twenty patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated for a median of 3.5 cycles. Prostate-specific antigen decreased by more than 30% in 18 patients, including 14 patients with a decrease of more than 50%. Median overall survival was 11 months, prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival was 6.5 months, and radiographic progression-free survival was 7 months. Conclusion: Docetaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine shows efficacy against castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document