CUCUMBER FRUIT GROWTH RATE IN RELATION TO CLIMATE

1999 ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Medany ◽  
M.M. Wadid ◽  
A.F. Abou-Hadid
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Cucumber Fruit

The growth of apricot fruit. II. The effects of temperature and gibberellic acid

1967 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
DI Jackson ◽  
BG Coombe
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Gibberellic Acid ◽  
Fruit Size ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Cell Diameter ◽  
Initial Growth ◽  
Endogenous Gibberellin ◽  
Flower Buds ◽  
Size And Shape

The effect of temperature and gibberellic acid (GA3) applications on apricot fruit have been determined by measurements of fruit size and shape, mesocarp cell number, size, and shape, and endogenous gibberellin. Application of heat during the first 10 nights after anthesis increased the initial growth rate of fruit and of cells in the mesocarp and produced more rapid cell division in this tissue. It did not affect final fruit size or the number and diameter of cells in the mesocarp. Higher temperatures did, however, hasten maturity of fruit. GA3 perfused into branches before anthesis produced an increased drop of flower buds and fruit, raised the ratio of flower buds to leaf buds initiated that season, and resulted in elongated pedicels. Initially, fruit growth rate was increased by GA3, but subsequently it was depressed and final size was below normal. These effects on fruit size were mainly due to effects on the rate of cell division. Some differences were noted in the dimensions of cells but final radial cell diameter did not differ from untreated fruit. GA3-treated fruit ripened sooner than controls. Neither heating nor GA3 treatments affected the level of endogenous gibberellin-like substances in the fruit or their RF on paper chromatograms. There were no significant interactions between temperature and gibberellin in any parameter of apricot fruit growth.

scholarly journals Seasonal Changes in Water-soluble Ca Concentration and Blossom-end Rot in a Medium-sized Fruit Cultivar of Tomato ‘Cindy Sweet’ in Relation to Fruit Growth Rate

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuo Ooyama ◽  
Yuichi Yoshida ◽  
Tran Duy Vinh ◽  
Yoshiyuki Tanaka ◽  
Ken-ichiro Yasuba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Seasonal Changes ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Blossom End Rot

scholarly journals Development and Testing of a Model to Rapidly Predict Apple Thinner Response

HortScience ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 793C-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.W. Greene* ◽  
A.N. Lakso ◽  
T.L. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Fruit Set ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Cold Weather ◽  
Accurate Predictor ◽  
Accuracy Of Prediction ◽  
June Drop ◽  
Fruit Diameter

Several thinning experiments were initiated in 2003 to test the hypothesis that monitoring fruit growth is an appropriate and accurate method to predict final fruit set early enough to apply supplemental thinners if appropriate. A total of eight thinning treatments were applied in Massachusetts and New York. On the day of thinner application 70 to 100 spurs were tagged on 4-8 trees (replications). All fruit within a spur were individually identified and fruit were measured. At 2 to 3 day intervals fruit diameter was measured at a designated point on the fruit. Growth rate of the fastest growing 20 fruit on the untreated trees was used as the criteria to determine growth rate of fruit that would persist to harvest. A fruit on a treated tree was predicted to abscise if growth rate slowed to 50% or less of the growth rate of the 20 fastest growing fruit on untreated trees. Cold weather in 2003 following thinner application slowed the response time to thinners. Thinning treatments were applied to Delicious, Golden Delicious, McIntosh, and Gala at 7-9-mm stage. BA, carbaryl, and combinations of NAA and carbaryl were used. In Massachusetts accuracy of prediction of final fruit set at 7-11 days after application ranged from 87% to 100% with and average of 95% accuracy compared to final observed drop at the end of June drop in July. In Geneva, N.Y., the temperature was so unseasonably cold following application that prediction of final set at 7 to 11 days after application was between 68% and 79% with an average of 74% accuracy. We conclude that prediction of final fruit set following growth rate of individual fruit shows promise as an accurate predictor of final fruit set early enough to apply supplemental thinners if appropriate.

scholarly journals 528 Modeling of Fruit Set in Apple—Approaches, Model Structure, and Initial Results

HortScience ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 486B-486
Author(s):  
Alan N. Lakso ◽  
Michael D. White
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Maximum Growth ◽  
Maximum Growth Rate ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Carbon Availability ◽  
Matter Production ◽  
Available Carbon ◽  
Initial Results

Several models of apple tree carbon balance have been developed, including a simplified model by our lab. Tree photosynthesis and total dry matter production is the best characterized except for root growth and root respiration. Once dry matter is produced and partitioned to the different organs (another key problem for modeling), the effects of carbon availability to the fruits on their growth and abscission needs to be modeled. Our approach is based on an observed relationship between increased abscission with decreased fruit growth rate of populations of fruit. From several empirical studies of fruit growth and abscission during chemical thinning or imposed stress early in the season, a relationship was found between % abscission and classes of fruit growth rates. It appears to be best if the fruit growth rate is expressed as a percent of the growth rate of the fastest growing group of fruits in each study. Thus in the model the fruit growth allowed by the available carbon each day is compared to a pre-determined maximum growth rate for the cultivar. The percent-of-maximum growth rate then determines how much abscission will occur. Then the growth rate of the remaining fruit is calculated. Additional parameters of the model allowed for a multiple-day buffer of carbon availability, an imposed fruit number reduction (i.e. equivalent to hand thinning), and temperature effects. Although there are more improvements planned, the initial tests have been promising with the simulations showing realistic patterns of fruit abscission and fruit growth.

scholarly journals Source- and Sink-limited Growth Periods of Developing Peach Fruits Indicated by Relative Growth Rate Analysis

1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.W. Pavel ◽  
T.M. DeJong
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Growth Curve ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Limited Growth ◽  
Peach Fruit ◽  
Relative Growth ◽  
Rate Analysis ◽  
Source And Sink

Peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] fruit thinning was used to reduce the competition for assimilates among peach fruits and to identify periods of source- and sink-limited growth during development. Individual fruit size, based on diameter or calculated dry matter accumulation, increased in trees with lower crop loads compared to fruits of unthinned trees in three peach cultivars. Relative growth rate analysis indicated that peach fruit growth was apparently limited by the assimilate supply (source-limited) or by its genetic growth potential (sink-limited) during specific growth periods. In stage I and at the beginning of stage III of the double-sigmoid growth curve, periods of source-limited growth occurred in the later-maturing cultivars Flamecrest and Cal Red. Peach fruit growth was apparently sink-limited during stage II of the growth curve when fruit relative growth rates were similar for the thinning treatments. Fruit growth in `Spring Lady', an early maturing cultivar, appeared to be primarily source-limited during the season. Although total fruit dry matter production was reduced by thinning, individual fruit dry weight on thinned trees was higher than that on trees with a heavy crop load. This typical thinning response was apparently caused by the differences in the amount of time that fruits grew under sink-vs. source-limited conditions with different crop loads. Final crop yield depended on fruit count per tree and on the available assimilate supply, and was affected by the individual fruit growth potential.

scholarly journals Benzyladenine as A Chemical Thinner for `McIntosh' Apples. II. Effects of Benzyladenine, Bourse Shoot Tip Removal, and Leaf Number on Fruit Retention

2000 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongcai Yuan ◽  
Duane W. Greene
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Apple Fruit ◽  
Fruit Weight ◽  
Shoot Tips ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Shoot Tip ◽  
Soluble Solids ◽  
Leaf Number ◽  
Solids Concentration ◽  
Fruiting Branch

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of BA, removal of bourse shoot tips including only folded leaves and growing point, and different numbers of leaves per fruit on fruit retention and fruit development in `More-Spur McIntosh'/Malling 7 (M.7) apple trees [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.]. Removal of the bourse shoot tip increased fruit retention, whereas BA thinned fruit regardless of whether shoot tips were removed or not. There was no interaction between BA application and shoot tipping. BA thinned fruit only when one leaf per fruit was on a girdled small fruiting branch, but not when leaf number per fruit was two or greater. Fruit weight and soluble solids concentration increased dramatically with increasing leaf number per fruit. BA reduced fruit growth rate when <16 leaves per fruit were present on the girdled branches between 3 and 7 days after treatment, but it did not affect fruit growth rate when 32 leaves per fruit were on the girdled branches. Increasing leaf number also increased viable seed number per fruit while decreasing the number of aborted seeds, but it had no effect on the number of total seeds per fruit. BA reduced the number of viable seeds per fruit only when the number of leaves per fruit was less than four. Results suggest that BA thins apple fruit mainly by reducing carbohydrates available to developing fruitlets. Chemical name used: N-(phenylmethyl)-1H-purine-6-amine [benzyladenine (BA)].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document