scholarly journals Prospects for the use of additional oral nutrition (siping) in nutritional support of cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-145
Author(s):  
E. V. Gameeva
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Nutritional Support ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Nutritional Therapy ◽  
Oral Nutrition ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
Anticancer Treatment

Most of cancer patients are faced with various nutritional disorders at the process of anticancer treatment. Cancer-induced metabolic abnormalities are impeded muscle recovery even with normal nutritional support. As a result, malnutrition can develop into the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome, aggravate the disease and adversely affect the outcome of treatment. Purpose of the study. Evaluate the effectiveness of oral nutritional support in cancer patients at different stages of antitumor treatment. Materials and methods. The literature research was conducted with keywords «quality of life», «nutritional support», «oral nutrition», «cancer» in such databases as eLIBRARY and MEDLINE in Russian and English. There was performed an analytical review of various methods of quality of life assessing, methods for assessing nutritional status and measures of choice for the necessary nutritional therapy in cancer patients. Results. Nutritional support at all stages of treatment for cancer patients may have an impact on treatment outcomes and the incidence of complications. In case of palliative care, nutritional support can be aimed at improving patient's quality of life and reducing the severity of a number of clinical symptoms, in particular, such as nausea and vomiting. Conclusion. It has been shown, that individual and intensive elimination of nutritional defects improves the quality of life of patients, especially if this occurs at an early stage of the disease. Further study of the effect from nutrition-oriented interventions in cancer patients undergoing treatment, is needed.

Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1380-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Lindley ◽  
S Vasa ◽  
W T Sawyer ◽  
E P Winer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Sexual Function ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Systemic Adjuvant Therapy

PURPOSE To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer patients who survived 2 to 5 years following initiation of adjuvant cytotoxic and/or hormonal therapy and to characterize relationships between QOL and patient physical symptoms, sexual function, and preferences regarding adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-six patients who had completed systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer between 1988 and 1991 were surveyed by written questionnaire and telephone interview. Sociodemographic information was obtained for each patient, and patients were asked to complete the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form 36 (SF-36), a series of questions regarding sexual function, and a survey about preferences for adjuvant therapy in relation to possible benefit. RESULTS The mean FLIC score among all patients was 138.3 (+/- 12.2), which suggests a high level of QOL. The reported frequency of moderate to severe symptoms was generally low (ie, < 15%), with fatigue (31.4%), insomnia (23.3%), and local numbness at the site of surgery (22.1%) occurring with greatest frequency. Patients reported a wide range of sexual difficulties. Preference assessment showed that more than 65% of patients were willing to undergo 6 months of chemotherapy for a 5% increase in likelihood of cancer cure. CONCLUSION Self-rated QOL in breast cancer patients 2 to 5 years following adjuvant therapy was generally favorable. Less than one third of patients reported moderate to severe symptoms. Selected aspects of sexual function appeared to be compromised. The majority of patients indicated a willingness to accept 6 months of chemotherapy for small to modest potential benefit.

scholarly journals A Novel Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Platform for Head and Neck Oncology Patients–-A Pilot Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CMENT.S40219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria K. Peltola ◽  
Joel S. Lehikoinen ◽  
Lauri T. Sippola ◽  
Kauko Saarilahti ◽  
Antti A. Mäkitie
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

Introduction The patient's role in toxicity reporting is increasingly acknowledged. There is also a need for developing modern communication methods between the patient and the medical personnel. Furthermore, the increasing number of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is reflected in the volume of treatment follow-up visits, which remains a challenge for the health care. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measures may provide a cost-efficient way to organize follow-up for cancer patients. Materials and Methods We tested a novel ePRO application called Kaiku®, which enables real-time, online collection of patient-reported outcomes, such as side effects caused by treatment and quality of life. We conducted a pilot study to assess the suitability of Kaiku® for HNC patients at the Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Patients used Kaiku® during and one month after radiotherapy to report treatment-related side effects and quality of life. Two physicians and a nurse performed the practical electronic communication part of the study. Results Five of the nine patients agreed to participate in the study: three of them had local early-stage larynx cancer (T2N0, T1aN0, and T2N0) and the remaining two patients had early-stage base of tongue cancer (T2N0 and T1N2b). The degree of side effects reported by the patients via Kaiku® ranged from mild to life threatening. The number of outcome data points on patients' progress was significantly increased, which resulted in a better follow-up and improved communication between the patient and the care team. Conclusions Kaiku® seems to be a suitable tool to monitor side effects and quality of life during and after radiotherapy among HNC patients. Kaiku® and similar tools could be useful in organizing a cost-effective follow-up process for HNC patients. We recommend conducting a larger study to further assess the impact of an ePRO solution in routine clinical practice. • ePRO solutions may aid in the follow-up for cancer patients. • They seem suitable to monitor, for example, side effects and quality of life. • These systems ensure fast patient-driven reporting.

Quality of life and satisfaction with care in a contemporary cohort of pancreatic cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21623-e21623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman ◽  
Daniel John Renouf ◽  
David F. Schaeffer ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Early Stage Disease

e21623 Background: Pancreatic cancer patients face significant disease- and treatment-related morbidity while management is frequently complex. With recent advances in radiation and surgery and the introduction of new systemic therapy regimens, understanding these patients’ quality of life (QOL) and their satisfaction with the care that they currently receive is essential to inform the design of future care delivery models. Methods: Pancreas Centre BC was established in British Columbia in 2012 to promote efficient triage, rapid access to multidisciplinary care, and early involvement of palliative care, if necessary. Consecutive pancreatic cancer patients who were referred to and seen at Pancreas Centre BC completed the EORTC-QLQ C30 and PAN26 questionnaires before and after surgery as well as surveys focused on the levels of satisfaction with their disease management. Using independent samples t-tests, we correlated clinical characteristics with QOL and satisfaction scores. Results: In total, 167 patients were included: median age was 63 years, 45% were men, and 70% were ECOG 0/1. The majority had early stage disease (78%), pancreatic head tumors (53%), adenocarcinoma histology (68%), and adjuvant gemcitabine (75%). Baseline mean QOL scores were 63, 90, 83, 58 and 92 (out of 100) in the overall, physical, emotional, cognitive and social domains, respectively. Advanced age ( > 70 years), weight loss ( > 10 kg), and poor ECOG were independently associated with lower overall QOL rating (all p > 0.05). Surgery had a positive impact on all functional domains where we observed a mean improvement in QOL scores ranging from 8 to 17 points (all p > 0.05). In terms of satisfaction, 94% of patients rated their overall care as good to excellent. Likewise, 80% of patients were very or mostly satisfied with the amount of information they received and 84% of patients rated the healthcare information they received as very or mostly helpful. Conclusions: Despite the morbidity of pancreatic cancer, patients referred to and seen at a tertiary pancreatic cancer center reported good QOL and satisfaction levels, suggesting that the centralization of pancreatic cancer care may be an effective model to address the high priority needs of this population

Differences in quality of life and emotional health by diagnosis among women with early-stage gynecological cancers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23180-e23180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Isaksson Vogel ◽  
Patricia Jewett ◽  
Audrey Messelt ◽  
Heewon Lee ◽  
Susan Everson-Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Vulvar Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Emotional Health ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Gynecological Cancers ◽  
Post Traumatic

e23180 Background: Psychosocial outcomes have been described in women with gynecological cancers, but potential differences by diagnosis have received less attention. We sought to compare quality of life (QOL) and emotional health among early stage gynecological cancer survivors by disease location. Methods: We present baseline data from an ongoing cohort study of gynecological cancer patients treated at an academic cancer center. Measures include cancer-related QOL, emotional health and negative (post-traumatic stress disorder-PTSD) and positive (post-traumatic growth-PTG) reactions to cancer. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models (restricted to stage I or II; excluding vaginal/vulvar) explored differences in QOL and emotional health by diagnosis. Potential confounders considered for inclusion in the final models were age, stage, education, income, partner status, treatment status, and race. Results: 222 patients with early stage disease completed the survey: 56 (25.2%) ovarian, 122 (55.5) endometrial, 33 cervical (14.9%), and 11 (5%) vaginal/vulvar cancer. Cervical and vaginal/vulvar cancer patients reported greater cancer-related distress, anxiety and PTSD scores (Table). Endometrial cancer patients reported lowest PTG scores. Conclusions: Our analyses suggest early stage gynecological cancer patients face different psychosocial sequelae based on diagnosis, with worse outcomes generally being associated with younger age. Further research is needed to assess low PTG among endometrial cancer patients, since PTG is considered a potentially beneficial psychosocial outcome of cancer. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document