Hatha Yoga Practice for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Pilot Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maricarmen Vizcaino
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Physiological Stress ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Hatha Yoga ◽  
The Impact

Objective: This study was conducted to examine the impact of Hatha yoga on glycemic control, psychological and physiological stress, and self-care for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Ten sedentary individuals with T2DM who were non-insulin dependent, free of diabetes-related complications, and had no previous yoga experience completed therapeutic yoga classes for 6 weeks, 3 times per week . Glycemic control measures included fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and fasting insulin. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale, and salivary cortisol were used to assess levels of stress, and the Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities questionnaire was used to assess regimen adherence. Results: No significant changes in glucose control or physiological stress were found; however, significant changes in perceived stress, state anxiety, and self-care behaviors were detected. Conclusions: Preliminary findings support further investigation of the benefits of Hatha yoga as a complementary therapy for those with T2DM.

scholarly journals Type D personality and its impact on patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsin Lin ◽  
Di-An Chen ◽  
Chemin Lin ◽  
Hsuan Huang
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Type D

Abstract Background: Type D personality (TDP) has been recognized as a risk factor for many diseases. Researches in association with TDP and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were limited. Aims: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of TDP, also to assess the relationship between TDP and perceived stress, self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and psychological distress on Taiwanese patients with T2DM.Methods: 198 patients with T2DM were recruited consecutively from the department of endocrinology of a regional hospital in Taipei, Taiwan from December 2017 to April 2018. The participants completed questionnaires containing questions about sociodemographic characteristics, TDP, illness-related stress, self-efficacy, execution of diabetes management and emotional distress. Their medical records were reviewed for biomedical data.Results: 41.4% of the 198 patients had TDP. Controlling for sociodemographic factors, patients with TDP were reported significantly poorer on glycemic control than those without this personality (P<0.05). Compared to those without TDP, the results showed significantly higher levels of perceived stress (P<0.001) and psychological distress (anxiety and depression) (P<0.001), as well as significantly lower levels of self-efficacy (P<0.001) and self-care behaviors (P<0.001) on patients with TDP. TDP is positively correlated with perceived stress and psychological distress. It is negatively correlated with self-efficacy and self-care behavior scores.Discussion: This study provides the evidence linking TDP with poor glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors, as well as high perceived stress and psychological distress, which highlights the screening of TDP and the specific needs for the care among T2DM patients with TDP.

An Observational Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 990-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arundhati Dasgupta ◽  
Jasjeet Wasir ◽  
Maria Beloyartseva ◽  
Sandeep Malhotra ◽  
Ambrish Mithal
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
The Impact

Self-Care Behaviors and Glycemic Control in Low-Income Adults in México With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus May Have Implications for Patients of Mexican Heritage Living in the United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia G. Compeán Ortiz ◽  
Beatriz Del Ángel Pérez ◽  
Eunice Reséndiz González ◽  
Socorro Piñones Martínez ◽  
Nora H. González Quirarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
United States ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Self Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mexican Heritage

The Impact of Fasting during Ramadan on the Glycemic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (09) ◽  
pp. 531-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sahin ◽  
T. Ayaz ◽  
N. Ozyurt ◽  
K. Ilkkilic ◽  
A. Kirvar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
The Impact

The impact of fasting during Ramadan on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serap Baydur Sahin ◽  
Teslime Ayaz ◽  
Neslihan Ozyurt ◽  
Kadir Ilkkilic ◽  
Abdulkadir Kirvar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Diabetes Resilience Training on Self-Care, Glycemic Control, and Diabetes Burnout of Adult Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Hidayat Arifin ◽  
Kusnanto Kusnanto ◽  
Erna Dwi Wahyuni ◽  
Rifky Octavia Pradipta
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Blood Sugar ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Diabetes Distress ◽  
Adult Type ◽  
Resilience Training

Introduction: Treatment that must continue, control, and diet that must be obeyed by people with DM can cause boredom (burnout) - inability to care for themselves, and blood sugar that is not controlled. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of diabetes resilience training on self-care, glycemic control, and diabetes burnout of adult type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental design. The total samples were 70 respondents (treatment and control) obtained by cluster sampling. The independent variable was diabetes resilience training and dependent variables were self-care, glycemic control, and diabetes burnout. The intervention provided for one month with four meetings. Instrument used self-care questionnaire of Self-Care Inventory-Revised (SCI-R), glycemic control questionnaire used an observation sheet for fasting blood sugar, and diabetes burnout questionnaire used Diabetes Distress-Screening Scale (DDS17). Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed ranks test, Mann Whitney U Test, Independent-sample t-test, and 1-Sample K-S. Results: There was an effect of diabetes resilience training on self-care (p = 0.003; p <0.05), glycemic control (p = 0.020; p <0.05), and diabetes burnout (p = 0,000; p <0.05). Conclusions: Diabetes resilience training provided by researchers to respondents can improve good self-care behavior, decreased glycemic control values, and decreased distress (diabetes burnout) in adult type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Based on the results, it is recomandation to nurses and health care provider to implementation the diabetes resilience training regularly.

scholarly journals MON-622 Rapid Improvement in Glycated Albumin Before Educational Admission Predicts Fair Glycemic Control One Year After the Discharge of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Katsuragawa ◽  
Yuya Tsurutani ◽  
Tomoko Takiguchi ◽  
Jun Saito ◽  
Tetsuo Nishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Glycated Albumin ◽  
Rapid Improvement ◽  
Loading Test ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Aim: Glycated albumin (GA) reflects a short-term glycemic control (about 2 weeks) in comparison to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) which reflects a long-term glycemic control. Thus, if the dietary, exercise, or medication therapy before the educational admission is effective, a rapid improvement in GA can be observed. However, the impact of the improvement in GA on the subsequent glycemic control is not well understood. This retrospective study analyzed the association between the change of GA before educational admission and glycemic control one year after the discharge of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Method: We analyzed data from 114 T2DM patients who were admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2016. The GA data within 30 days before admission and on the day of admission were available for all patients. The change of GA per day (ΔGA/day) was calculated as [(GA on admission) - (GA before admission)/number of days between the two measurements of GA]. Patients with renal dysfunction (eGFR &lt; 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or insulin deficiency [fasting C-peptide (CPR) &lt; 0.5 ng/mL or two-hour postprandial CPR &lt; 1.0 ng/mL] were excluded. Patients achieving an HbA1c of &lt; 7.0 % at one year after discharge were defined as achievers, and the rest were defined as non-achievers. Multiple baseline factors including the ΔGA/day between the two groups were compared. Results: Of the 114 patients, 68 were achievers and 46 were non-achievers. GA significantly declined during before and just after the admission to hospital (median [interquartile range]: 26.0 [22.2 - 32.7] to 25.0 [21.4 - 29.8] %, p &lt; 0.001). The range of the ΔGA/day was between -1.14 and 0.28, with a median value of -0.08 [-0.26 - 0.002]. The age, body mass index, and HbA1c levels at admission were not significantly different between the two groups. The increase in CPR after the glucagon loading test was higher in the achievers than in the non-achievers (1.85 [1.32 - 2.87] vs 1.21 [0.53 - 1.92] ng/ml, p = 0.004). The ΔGA/day was lower in the achievers than in the non-achievers (-0.14 [-0.39 - -0.006] vs -0.04 [-0.13 - 0.03], p = 0.002). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the ΔGA/day was the factor associated with achieving an HbA1c of &lt; 7.0% at one year after discharge (Odds ratio: 0.037, 95 % confidence interval: 0.004 - 0.267, p &lt; 0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the ΔGA/day had an area under the curve of 0.67 in the achievement group and the cutoff value was set as -0.146 for predicting the achievement, with a sensitivity of 0.50 and a specificity of 0.85. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the change in GA before the educational admission can predict the glycemic control one year after the discharge of T2DM patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document