To the XIV anniversary of the Autonomous Tatar SSR

1934 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-494

The victory of the October Revolution and the overthrow of the power of the exploiters created the decisive conditions for a correct and radical resolution of the national question. "Prison of Nations" was the name of tsarist Russia, and in this prison Tatarstan was also in trouble. The economic and cultural inequality of nationalities, the economic and cultural backwardness, the "idiocy of village life," multiplied by national oppression-that's what characterized the situation of the Tatar proletariat and the working peasantry in the past.

Slovenica ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 10-30
Author(s):  
Petra Testen Koren

The Russian chapel under Vršič celebrated centenary in 2016. It became a symbol for many people. Firstly, it was a symbol of Russiafor prisoners of war. Then it represented contact with “home” for all those who, after the October Revolution, found their home abroad, in Slovenia. The Chapel was a silent friend of travelers and mountaineers for many years, and today it also represents a symbol of friendship between Russia and Slovenia. Every year at the end of July, on the St. Vladimir’s day, people gather in memory of the past and present, for awarning. The text provides a brief insight into the last 100 years of the Russian chapel.


2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (94) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Filippo Menozzi

Rosa Luxemburg will be honoured, remembered, and celebrated as a figure from the past only when, in a future still to-come, the goals of social justice, peace and equality that she fought for are realised. As long as bitter struggles and widespread suffering continue, she is still living, a living substance that is part of the present and can inspire political engagement. The wider meaning of declaring Rosa Luxemburg our contemporary, then, is that the objectives she struggled for are still to-come, and the forms of violence and oppression she struggled against are still part of the material social conditions of today’s world. This coevalness can be pronounced because many issues at the heart of her thought and activism are still with us: from imperialism and the national question to what Nancy Fraser calls the 'back-stories' of capitalism. This special issue of New Formations aims to contribute to the transmission of this vital legacy by suggesting questions about relevance, memory and resonance: how does Luxemburg speak to us, how do her thoughts echo with our own? How can we prevent the legacy of Rosa Luxemburg from becoming heritage, a thing of the past? The essays and interviews included in this special issue grapple in different ways with the central question of how to assess the contemporaneity of Rosa Luxemburg without turning her into an object of commemoration.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Egor M. Isaev

Abstract This article discusses the representation of the era of the October Revolution and the Civil War in contemporary Russian popular cinema. It describes the modern tools used by the state to create new images of the past and to reconstruct history in Russian popular culture. It also considers how Russian society has reacted to this official discourse.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-229
Author(s):  

AbstractMany painful ideological problems existing in contemporary Russia are determined by the inadequacy of perception of the country's revolutionary past. This misperception stems from both the consequences of the decades-long mythologization of the October Revolution and its leaders and from the more recent attempts to get rid of the dependence on Bolshevik propaganda. Contemporary historic memory in Russia is beset with one major contradiction: the desire to part with the myth, and the inability to do so. Although, traditionally, images of the past are usually adapted in order to suit the needs of modernity, this task has become much easier in contemporary society with its powerful mass media fitted with visual networks. Historic memory, previously shaped by legends, folklore, rites and rituals, now comes under relentless fire from the dilettantes pretending to have discovered some "true" vision of the past, and illustrating this vision by incongruous video footage. As a result, images of the past inevitably lose their former edifying role and become a means of inculcation by propagating political and moral stereotypes advantageous to the authorities. The wave of discussions on the Russian Revolution, which rose in connection with its current anniversary, was yet another indication that today's ideologists, with their inept denunciations, are only aggravating the trauma inflicted on social conscience.


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Moisio

Fundamental state restructuring has taken place in Finland over the past fifteen years and this transformation is increasingly revolving around the spatial dimension of statehood. The nation-state as the primary scale of political regulation and articulation from the 1960s onwards is increasingly challenged in contemporary political action concerning the "survival of Finland." The analysis discloses a new discursive field which structures and regulates political thinking about the Finnish state and which has surfaced during the past decade. This new discursive field includes four key dimensions: 1) the national question is purely global in nature, 2) the national question is based on continuous change, 3) nations and states are competing in world markets similarly to the way corporations do, and 4) global competition between states manifests itself in the locational preferences of national and international firms and creative class. The welfare spatiality which is based on social compromise and a particular decentralized settlement structure is increasingly challenged in pro-business argumentation which emphasizes the need to create economically effective, centralized as well as internationally attractive state space. The paper therefore argues that in Finland the key dimension of the current debate on state transformation especially touches upon the issue of getting out of the Keynesian welfare state tradition that evolved during the past decades. Three conclusions follow from the empirical analysis. First, the role of state territory is increasingly re-imagined in most of the neoliberal arguments of state space. Secondly, the Keynesian spatial fixes still cause a significant inertia regarding the construction of a state that would be based on pure economic engineering. Thirdly, the discrepancy between Keynesian spatial compromise and Schumpeterian economic reasoning will most obviously lead to growing tensions in the field of regional politics and planning.


Author(s):  
Emily Frey

This chapter looks at Rimsky-Korsakov's Snegurochka (The Snow Maiden) in the political context of the era, namely within a particular branch of 1870s populism that extolled “harmonious communal ritual, agrarian prehistory, and the development of individual feeling.” Together, the Snegurochkas of Alexander Ostrovsky and Rimsky-Korsakov offer perhaps the clearest representations in art of the populist notion of the ideal past, depicting the prehistoric village as a site of social cooperation and humane politics. Indeed, in his adaptation of Snegurochka, Rimsky-Korsakov united an idealized vision of the past with the progress of private, inner feeling. Meanwhile, Russia's thick journals of the seventies brimmed with articles by populist thinkers like Nikolai Mikhailovsky and stories about village life by writers such as Gleb Uspensky and Nikolai Zlatovratsky.


1970 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 142-159
Author(s):  
Barbara Jelavich

Although all governments in the past have been strongly influenced in the conduct of foreign policy by domestic considerations arising from the political, economic, and social compositions of their populations and the ethnic divisions within their state, in no European country has the intertwining and interaction between internal controversy and foreign diplomacy been so significant and so fateful for Europe as in the Habsburg monarchy in the last fifty years of its existence. By the close of the nineteenth century not only were the component nationalities in the process of shifting their prime loyalties from the symbol of Habsburg unity, the emperor, to their own leaders and parties, but the majority of them had been able to secure the sympathy, if not the outright assistance, of foreign governments. For instance, the Eomanians and Italians of the monarchy could look to strongly nationalistic governments in Bucharest and Rome whose irredentist propensities were scarcely concealed; the Habsburg South Slavs could hope for future encouragement from Serbia, despite the fact that under the Obrenović dynasty the Serbian government had close ties with Vienna. Among the great powers Russia, although herself a conservative empire opposed to the breakup of the Habsburg state, nevertheless offered a great deal of attraction for some Czechs, South Slavs, and Ruthenes. Even the nationally-minded citizens of the German empire, the monarchy's closest ally, were deeply concerned about the relative position of their German brethren within Austria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document