scholarly journals Artificial intelligence in the fight against extremism

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Vasily V. Bychkov ◽  
Vladimir A. Prorvich

The article reveals the basic regulatory framework for the use of artificial intelligence in Russia. The possibility of using artificial intelligence to fight crime is being analyzed. The need for artificial intelligence to create computer forensic in countering extremist crimes is in development.

Author(s):  
Andriyana Andreeva ◽  
Galina Yolova

The study analyzes the influence of artificial intelligence on labor relations and the related need to adapt to the legal institute of liability in labor law with the new social realities. The sources at European level are studied and the current aspects of liability in the labor law at a national level are analyzed. Based on the analysis, the challenges are outlined and the trends for the doctrine, the European community, and the legislation for the introduction of a regulatory framework are identified.


2020 ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
S. Yu. Chucha

The author analyzes the existing legal, philosophical and technical approaches to the application of artificial intelligence technology in labor and related relations. The prospects of developing a regulatory framework for resolving labor disputes in Labor Dispute Commissions and courts of the Russian Federation, the practice of acceptance of a claim, preparing cases for litigation, and considering labor disputes using elements of artificial intelligence are assessed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-117
Author(s):  
Kamil Muzyka

AbstractHuman-AGI relations are soon going to be a subject to number of policies and regulations. Although most current Blue Sky de lege ferenda postulates towards robot and artificial intelligence regulatory framework are focused on the liability of the producer or the owner of the AI based product, one might try to conceptualize the legal relations and rules for the coexistence between humans and an anthropocognitive AI’s (AGI) possessing proper capacity. The main purpose of this article is to explore the possibility of applying the principles of Metalaw to mentioned relations. The scope shall consider a non-chattel and non-property based status of those types of AIs, as well as sufficient advancement of such entities, or the emergence of advanced non-human based intelligence.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Mitja KOVAC

The issue of super-intelligent artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to attract ever more attention in economics, law, sociology and philosophy studies. A new industrial revolution is being unleashed, and it is vital that lawmakers address the systemic challenges it is bringing while regulating its economic and social consequences. This paper sets out recommendations to ensure informed regulatory intervention covering potential uncontemplated AI-related risks. If AI evolves in ways unintended by its designers, the judgment-proof problem of existing legal persons engaged with AI might undermine the deterrence and insurance goals of classic tort law, which consequently might fail to ensure optimal risk internalisation and precaution. This paper also argues that, due to identified shortcomings, the debate on the different approaches to controlling hazardous activities boils down to a question of efficient ex ante safety regulation. In addition, it is suggested that it is better to place AI in the existing legal categories and not to create a new electronic legal personality.


European View ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 178168582110592
Author(s):  
Michał Boni

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated the digital revolution and has had an enormous impact on all aspects of life. Work patterns are starting to change, and cooperation between humans and machines, currently humans and various forms of AI, is becoming crucial. There are advantages and some threats related to these new forms of human–AI collaboration. It is necessary to base this collaboration on ethical principles, ensuring the autonomy of humans over technology. This will create trust, which is indispensable for the fruitful use of AI. This requires an adequate regulatory framework: one that is future proof, anticipates how AI will develop, takes a risk-based approach and implements ex ante assessment as a tool to avoid unintended consequences. Furthermore, we need human oversight of the development of AI, supported by inter-institutional partnerships. But first we need to create the conditions for the development of AI digital literacy.


2022 ◽  
pp. 21-39
Author(s):  
Karisma Karisma

The application of AI technology in different sectors can intrude on the data subjects' privacy rights. While the data protection laws attempt to regulate the use and processing of personal data, these laws obstruct the growth and development of AI technology. Current regulations are unable to cope with the AI revolution due to the pacing problem and Collingridge dilemma. In view of the regulatory gaps and the complexity of technology, there is a strong justification to regulate AI technology. It is increasingly important to safeguard privacy without encumbering AI technology with regulatory requirements that will hinder its progress. With the convergence of AI and blockchain technology, privacy challenges are exacerbated. In this chapter, several types of regulations will be analysed to decipher a suitable regulatory framework for AI. This is to ensure effective regulation of AI and to allow AI to flourish with the use and application of blockchain features.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document