On locating local earthquakes using small networks

1969 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 1201-1212
Author(s):  
David E. James ◽  
I. Selwyn Sacks ◽  
Eduardo Lazo L. ◽  
Pablo Aparicio G.

abstract Mathematical instability in four-parameter least squares hypocenter solutions arises primarily from the fact that the four computed variables—origin time (T0), focal depth (h), latitude (θ), and longitude (λ)—are not strictly independent. Specifically, T0 exhibits a non-independent relationship with the geometric parameters. For small networks (< 10–15 stations), the lack of independence between T0 and the other variables results in unstable least-squares solutions. This instability is manifest most clearly by the fact that different station subsets of the observational network produce significantly different solutions for the same earthquake. The instability can be eliminated by computing T0 independently for each station using the formula ( T 0 ) i = ( T p ) i − V k ( T s − p ) i V p , where Tp = P-wave arrival time, Vk = S-P velocity, Vp = P-wave velocity, and Ts-p = time interval between P and S arrivals. An average value of T0 can be obtained from the individually calculated origin times and the P-wave travel times calculated. The variables ϕ, λ and z are then computed by the usual least-squares procedure using P-wave travel times only. The method is iterative and an average T0 is recalculated in the course of each iteration. Fundamental properties of travel times within the Earth impose definite limitations upon the accuracy of the locations. Low values of the derivative dTp/dh at epicentral distances of a few degrees introduce a large uncertainty in focal depth, particularly for shallow (0–60 km) earthquakes. There is normally little error in epicenter, however, even for solutions in which depth is poorly determined. The dimensions and geometric configuration of the network in relation to the epicenter and the proximity of the epicenter to any one station are controlling factors in predicting the minimum uncertainty for any given hypocenter solution.

1970 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1479-1489
Author(s):  
Seweryn J. Duda

Abstract A method is presented enabling one to estimate the volume of seismic events with all possible magnitudes and focal depths. The underlying observational data are either the travel times of body waves, or the equivalent magnitude calibration curves for body waves, if the absorption of body waves is neglected. The method is applied to the newest P-wave travel times. The distance from the focus to a point at which a given critical strain existed during the event is computed. The volume within strains larger than the critical prevailed during the event is obtained as a function of magnitude and focal depth. The volume so found is in agreement with a previous determination of the earthquake volume as a function of magnitude.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A BOTTARI ◽  
B. FEDERICO

The observed travel-times of the P-waves for twenty shallow, intermediate, and deep earthquakes, with epicenters in the Mediterranean area, are used in order to analyze some characteristics of the upper mantle. A first- order discontinuity, identifiable as the "20° discontinuity", is found at a depth of 505 ± 16 km in the area underneath the Mediterranean basin. The velocity contrast is equal to 12% (above T'= 8.9 km/sec; below V= 9.97 km/sec). Assuming that this discontinuity gives rise to reflected P-waves (PdP), the travel times of these waves are calculated for various hypocentral depths. The observation of impulses identified as PdP on the seismograms of Messina supports this hypothesis. This result and its implications are discussed in the contest of the conclusions of various authors who locate a P-wave velocity-discontinuity at different depths between 400 and 580 km. Finally, particular emphasis is given to the regional character of the analyzed structures in question.


1969 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 755-769
Author(s):  
K. L. Kaila

abstract A new analytical method for the determination of velocity at the hypocenter of a deep earthquake has been developed making use of P- and S-wave travel times. Unlike Gutenberg's method which is graphical in nature, the present method makes use of the least square technique and as such it yields more quantitative estimates of the velocities at depth. The essential features of this method are the determination from the travel times of a deep-focus earthquake the lower and upper limits Δ1 and Δ2 respectively of the epicentral distance between which p = (dT/dΔ) in the neighborhood of inflection point can be considered stationary so that the travel-time curve there can be approximated to a straight line T = pΔ + a. From p = (1/v*) determined from the straight line least-square fit made on the travel-time observation points between Δ1 and Δ2 for various focal depths, upper-mantle velocity structure can be obtained by making use of the well known relation v = v*(r0 − h)/r0, h being the focal depth of the earthquake, r0 the radius of the Earth, v* the apparent velocity at the point of inflection and v the true velocity at that depth. This method not only gives an accurate estimate of p, at the same time it also yields quite accurate value of a which is a function of focal depth. Calibration curves can be drawn between a and the focal depth h for various regions of the Earth where deep focus earthquakes occur, and these calibration curves can then be used with advantage to determine the focal depths of deep earthquakes in those areas.


1968 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1879-1897
Author(s):  
K. L. Kaila ◽  
P. R. Reddy ◽  
Hari Narain

ABSTRACT P-wave travel times of 39 shallow earthquakes and three nuclear explosions with epicenters in the North in Himalayas, Tibet, China and USSR as recorded in Indian observatories have been analyzed statistically by the method of weighting observations. The travel times from Δ = 2° to 50° can be represented by four straight line segments indicating abrupt velocity changes around 19°, 22° and 33° respectively. The P-wave velocity at the top of the mantle has been found to be 8.31 ± 0.02 km/sec. Inferred upper mantle structure reveals three velocity discontinuities in the upper mantle at depths (below the crust) of 380 ± 20, 580 ± 50 and 1000 ± 120 km with velocities below the discontinuities as 9.47 ± 0.06, 10.15 ± 0.07 and 11.40 ± 0.08 km/sec respectively. The J-B residuals up to Δ = 19° are mostly negative varying from 1 to 10 seconds with a dependence on Δ values indicating a different upper mantle velocity in the Himalayan region as compared to that used by Jeffreys-Bullen in their tables (1940). Between 19° to 33° there is a reasonably good agreement between the J-B curve and the observation points. From Δ = 33° to 50° the J-B residuals are mostly positive with an average excess value of about 4 sec.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1245-1246

Okoye et al. develop a least-squares iterative inversion technique determining of the elastic parameters δ* and vertical P-wave velocity (α0) of any transversely isotropic modeling material in the laboratory. The anisotropic inverse modeling technique finds the best fitting solution and implements analytical rather than numerical differentiations to optimize the accuracy of the results.


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Jarrod C. Dunne ◽  
Greg Beresford ◽  
Brian L. N Kennett

We developed guidelines for building a detailed elastic depth model by using an elastic synthetic seismogram that matched both prestack and stacked marine seismic data from the Gippsland Basin (Australia). Recomputing this synthetic for systematic variations upon the depth model provided insight into how each part of the model affected the synthetic. This led to the identification of parameters in the depth model that have only a minor influence upon the synthetic and suggested methods for estimating the parameters that are important. The depth coverage of the logging run is of prime importance because highly reflective layering in the overburden can generate noise events that interfere with deeper events. A depth sampling interval of 1 m for the P-wave velocity model is a useful lower limit for modeling the transmission response and thus maintaining accuracy in the tie over a large time interval. The sea‐floor model has a strong influence on mode conversion and surface multiples and can be built using a checkshot survey or by testing different trend curves. When an S-wave velocity log is unavailable, it can be replaced using the P-wave velocity model and estimates of the Poisson ratio for each significant geological formation. Missing densities can be replaced using Gardner’s equation, although separate substitutions are required for layers known to have exceptionally high or low densities. Linear events in the elastic synthetic are sensitive to the choice of inelastic attenuation values in the water layer and sea‐floor sediments, while a simple inelastic attenuation model for the consolidated sediments is often adequate. The usefulness of a 1-D depth model is limited by misties resulting from complex 3-D structures and the validity of the measurements obtained in the logging run. The importance of such mis‐ties can be judged, and allowed for in an interpretation, by recomputing the elastic synthetic after perturbing the depth model to simulate the key uncertainties. Taking the next step beyond using simplistic modeling techniques requires extra effort to achieve a satisfactory tie to each part of a prestack seismic record. This is rewarded by the greater confidence that can then be held in the stacked synthetic tie and applications such as noise identification, data processing benchmarking, AVO analysis, and inversion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document