Major curriculum reform cycles upper secondary (all subjects) reported between 1980 and 2030

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Curriculum Reform ◽  
Upper Secondary ◽  
Secondary All

scholarly journals Hva hemmer og fremmer arbeidet med Utdanning for Bærekraftig Utvikling i videregående skole?

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Birgitte Bjønness ◽  
Astrid Tonette Sinnes
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Curriculum Reform ◽  
Education For Sustainable Development ◽  
Upper Secondary School ◽  
Whole School ◽  
Student Council ◽  
Upper Secondary ◽  
New Curriculum ◽  
Er Positive

Læreplanene for grunnopplæringen i Norge er for tiden under revisjon og fornyelse. Fagfornyelsen innebærer blant annet at bærekraftig utvikling blir et tverrfaglig og gjennomgående tema i skolen. Satsingen på Utdanning for Bærekraftig Utvikling (UBU) i skolen er per i dag hovedsakelig preget av enkeltstående prosjekter drevet fram av enkeltlærere. Vi har i denne studien intervjuet skoleledelse, lærere, elevråd, driftsleder og skoleeier ved fire videregående skoler for å få fram praksisfeltets stemmer knyttet til hva som hemmer og hva som fremmer arbeidet med UBU i norsk videregående skole. Funn fra studien viser at alle informantene er positive til en satsing på bærekraftig utvikling. Vi finner videre at det utkrystalliserer seg ni sentrale faktorer som påvirker i retning av å hemme eller fremme en helhetlig satsing på UBU. Informantene peker på hverandre når det gjelder å ta initiativ til å utvikle UBU lokalt; dette kan medføre en pulverisering av ansvar så lenge alle «sitter på gjerdet» og venter på at andre skal ta initiativ. En forpliktende satsing på UBU stiller krav til alle aktører og nivåer i skolen. Vi stiller spørsmål om satsingen på bærekraftig utvikling i fagfornyelsen er tilstrekkelig for å utvikle den tverrfaglige forståelsen og handlingskompetansen som er nødvendig for å forberede elevene på å leve bærekraftige liv i framtiden. En forpliktende satsing på UBU krever også at skolen og lærerne får tid og rom til å utvikle organisasjonen og læringsmåter lokalt.Nøkkelord: utdanning for bærekraftig utvikling, fagfornyelsen, videregående skole, hel-skoletilnærming, fokusgruppeintervjuer, aktører i skolenExploring drivers and challenges for the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in upper secondary schoolAbstractThe national curricula in Norway are currently under review and revision. As part of the revision, sustainable development becomes an interdisciplinary and comprehensive subject in school. There are presently few or no examples of schools that work comprehensively with Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in Norway. In this study, we have interviewed school management, teachers, student council, operation manager and school owner at four upper secondary schools in order to map what supports and what constrains a holistic effort to ESD in Norwegian upper secondary school. Findings from the study show that all the interviewees are positive to a commitment to sustainable development as part of the new curriculum. Further, we identify nine key factors influencing action as well as resulting from it, in the direction of support or constraint of a holistic effort to ESD. The interviewees point to each other when it comes to taking the initiative to develop ESD locally; this can result in a pulverization of responsibility as long as everyone "sits on the fence" waiting for others to take the initiative. A binding commitment to ESD places demands on all actors and levels at the school. We ask whether the inclusion of sustainable development in the new curriculum is sufficient for developing an interdisciplinary understanding and the action competence that is necessary to prepare the students for living sustainable lives in the future. A commitment to ESD also requires the school and the teachers to have the time and space to develop the organization and learning methods locally.Keywords: Education for Sustainable Development, curriculum reform, upper secondary school, whole-school approach, focus-group interviews, stakeholders in school

scholarly journals Gymnasiets laborationsundervisning i fysik – Vad påverkar lärares val av laborationer?

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Holmström ◽  
Ann-Marie Pendrill ◽  
Urban Eriksson ◽  
Nina Reistad
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Secondary Teachers ◽  
Curriculum Reform ◽  
Laboratory Work ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Upper Secondary ◽  
Laboratory Teaching ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Upper Secondary Schools ◽  
Factor Of Influence

Vilka faktorer påverkar svenska gymnasielärares laborationsundervisning i fysik? Frågan aktualiseras av den svenska läroplansrevisionen från 2011. I denna studie fick 17 lärare på fyra gymnasieskolor diskutera sin laborationsundervisning i fokusgruppsintervjuer. Baserat på en analys av dessa intervjuer genomfördes en kompletterande enkätundersökning med 66 lärare. Händelselogik användes som analysverktyg för att förstå hur lärarnas laborationsundervisning påverkas av olika faktorer. Resultaten från fokusgrupperna tyder på att lärare uppskattar laborationer som 1) bygger på enkel utrustning, 2) ger ett bra resultat avseende värdet på konstanter, samt 3) laborationer som eleverna tycker om. I enkätundersökningen framstod styrdokumenten som en starkare påverkansfaktor än i fokusgrupperna – men resultaten från båda delarna av undersökningen tyder på att styrdokumenten inte är den viktigaste faktorn i lärares val och upplägg av laborationer. In English What factors influence Swedish upper secondary teachers' laboratory teaching in physics? This is an issue raised by the curriculum reform of 2011 in Sweden. In this study, 17 teachers at four different upper secondary schools discussed their laboratory teaching in focus group interviews. Based on an analysis of these interviews, a supplementary survey of 66 teachers was conducted. Logic of events was used as an analytical tool to understand how different factors influence teachers' teaching. The results from the focus groups indicate that teachers appreciate laboratory work that 1) are based on simple equipment, 2) provide good values of constants, 3) laboratory exercises that the students like. In the survey, the syllabus emerged as a stronger factor of influence than in the focus groups – but, the results from both parts indicate that other factors than the syllabus play a larger role for teachers' choice and layout of laboratory work. FULL TEXT IN SWEDISH.

From Teachers for Education Change

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Beach
Keyword(s):  
Curriculum Reform ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Subject Position ◽  
Upper Secondary Education ◽  
The People ◽  
Upper Secondary ◽  
Data Production ◽  
Teacher Work ◽  
Comparable Quality

This article concerns issues connected to social inclusion and exclusion in Swedish upper secondary education in the late 1990s, after the 1994 curriculum reform. It is based on ethnographic fieldwork that was completed in 2000 and that appropriated participant observation and interview methods in data production. Extensive comments from teachers and headteachers on strategies and ideas about how to work within the context of the reform, with respect particularly to expressed aims of providing an education of good and comparable quality for all students and opening up higher education to groups who were previously excluded from it, figure strongly in the article. The intention was to discover what the people working within schools felt about their working experiences with respect to social inclusion and to understand what stands in the way of the realisation of social inclusion at present. The article indicates that two competing regimes of truth currently operate on what counts as valid teacher work but also that a creative subject position for all education participants is important in projects of inclusion.

The Schoolwork Engagement Inventory

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katariina Salmela-Aro ◽  
Katja Upadaya
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Older Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
Upper Secondary

This study introduces the Schoolwork Engagement Inventory (EDA), which measures energy, dedication, and absorption with respect to schoolwork. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the validity and reliability of the inventory among students attending postcomprehensive schools. A total of 1,530 (769 girls, 761 boys) students from 13 institutions (six upper-secondary and seven vocational schools) completed the EDA 1 year apart. The results showed that a one-factor solution had the most reliability and fitted best among the younger students, whereas a three-factor solution was most reliable and fit best among the older students. In terms of concurrent validity, depressive symptoms and school burnout were inversely related, and self-esteem and academic achievement were positively associated with EDA. Boys and upper-secondary-school students experienced lower levels of schoolwork engagement than girls and vocational-school students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document