scholarly journals Materiais Promissores para Melhorar as Propriedades Mecânicas e Físico-Químicas do Cimento de Ionômero de Vidro

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 104 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R R Silva ◽  
N J C Sena ◽  
D A Cunha ◽  
L C Souza ◽  
N S Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Materials ◽  
Dental Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer

O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar uma revisão de literatura sobre os materiais que estão sendo associados ao cimento de ionômero de vidro (CIV), visando melhorar suas propriedades mecânicas e físico-químicas. Foi realizada uma seleção de artigos científicos nas bases de dados PubMed, Europe PMC e ScienceDirect, usando os descritores Glass Ionomer Cements, Dental Materials e Dental Composite. O critério de inclusão foi estudo in vitro acerca do tema proposto e os de exclusão foram revisões de literatura e estudos clínicos. Foram encontrados 130 artigos, publicados entre os anos de 2012 a 2017, dos quais foram selecionados 10. De acordo com esta revisão, o uso de substâncias naturais, tais como os nanocristais de celulose, melhorou a resistência à compressão e diametral, módulo de elasticidade e resistência ao desgaste do CIV. Já a associação com o propólis resultou na diminuição significativa da resistência à compressão e o aumento da solubilidade do CIV. O uso das nanopartículas de AlO, ZrO e TiO2 foi avaliado, mostrando redução da porosidade dos cimentos ionoméricos e aumento da resistência à compressão. Quando o Nanoclay (montmorillonita de grau polimérico) foi adicionado à porção líquida do CIV, suas propriedades mecânicas melhoraram, entretanto a resistência à tensão diametral não apresentou melhora estatística significante. Portanto, o uso de substâncias associadas ao CIV mostrou melhora de suas propriedades, principalmente quando os nanocristais de celulose foram utilizados, podendo representar um novo e promissor material de restauração dentária.Palavras-chave: Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro. Materiais Dentários. Propriedades Físicas e Químicas.

scholarly journals In Vitro Weight Loss of Dental Composite Resins and Glass-Ionomer Cements Exposed to A Challenge Simulating the Oral Intake of Acidic Drinks and Foods

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Marco Colombo ◽  
Simone Gallo ◽  
Marco Chiesa ◽  
Claudio Poggio ◽  
Andrea Scribante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Soft Drink ◽  
Protective Layer ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Dental Composite ◽  
The Other ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Water Control

Specific conditions of the oral cavity, such as intake of acidic drinks, foods, and drugs, represent a damage both for teeth as well as restorative materials. The aim of this in vitro study is to assess the influence of an acidic challenge on the weight loss of biomimetic restorative dental materials (composite resins and glass-ionomer cements, respectively). Seven products recently available in the marked have been tested in this study for the two kinds of materials, respectively. Resin composites were divided into Groups 1A–7A, whereas glass-ionomer cements into Groups 1B–7B. A total of six samples was considered for each group, among which two were stored into distilled water (control samples) whereas the other four were immersed into soft drink (Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola Company, Milano, Italy) for 7 days. Respectively, after 1, 3 and 7 days, weight was assessed for each sample and the percentage weight loss was calculated. For all the composite resins (Groups 1A–7A), no significant intergroup or intragroup differences occurred for the weight loss values (p > 0.05). Conversely, all glass-ionomers (Groups 1B–7B) showed a significant and progressive weight loss after 1, 3, and 7 days of acid challenge (p < 0.05) (intragroup differences). This reduction was significantly lower in case of GC Equia Forte + Coat and ChemFil Rock, with respect to the other cements (p < 0.05) (intergroup differences). In conclusions, all the biomimetic composite resins showed a reliable behavior when exposed to acidic erosion, whereas glass-ionomers cements generally tended to solubilize. However, the additional use of a protective layer above these latter materials could reduce this event. Despite these results appear to be interesting from a clinical point of view, future morphological evaluations should be conducted to evaluate the superficial changes of the materials after acidic explosion.

An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements

1990 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Bowser Fajen ◽  
Manville G. Duncanson ◽  
Ram S. Nanda ◽  
G. Frans Currier ◽  
Padmaraj V. Angolkar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation

scholarly journals Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (21) ◽  
pp. 6694
Author(s):  
Flavia Iaculli ◽  
Alessandro Salucci ◽  
Gianni Di Giorgio ◽  
Valeria Luzzi ◽  
Gaetano Ierardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Deciduous Teeth ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flowable Composites

Background: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. Methods: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). Conclusions: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances.

scholarly journals Influence of Luting Materials on the Retention of Cemented Implant-Supported Crowns: An In Vitro Study

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ella Naumova ◽  
Felix Roth ◽  
Berit Geis ◽  
Christine Baulig ◽  
Wolfgang Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Retention Force ◽  
Implant Abutments ◽  
Aging Conditions

The retention force of cemented crowns on implant abutments with various luting materials was evaluated. Cobalt–chromium crowns were cemented onto tapered titanium abutments (Camlog) with eugenol-free temporary cement (RelyX TempBond NE), composite-based temporary cement (Bifix Temp), zinc phosphate cement (Harvard Cement), glass-ionomer cements (Meron, Fuji I), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji II, Fuji Plus, Ketac Cem Plus). Specimen aging via hydrostress was performed in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 14 days (S1), followed by hydrothermal stress with thermocycling (S2). The crowns were removed, and the force was recorded (T1). Subsequently, the crowns were recemented, aged, and removed, and the force was recorded (T2, T3). The retention forces differences were statistically significant according to the storage conditions at T1 (p = 0.002) and T3 (p = 0.0002). After aging (S1), Ketac Cem Plus had the highest retention force median value difference (T3 versus T1) (−773 N), whereas RelyX TempBond NE had the lowest (−146 N). After aging (S2), Meron had the highest retention force median value difference (−783 N), whereas RelyX TempBond NE had the lowest (−168 N). Recementation decreased the retention force of the implant-supported cobalt–chromium crowns cemented and recemented with the same luting materials. Luting materials (at T1) and aging conditions significantly impacted the retention force.

An in-vitro assessment of weekly cumulative fluoride release from three glass ionomer cements used for orthodontic banding

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Vahid-Dastjerdi ◽  
Ali Borzabadi-Farahani ◽  
Homa Pourmofidi-Neistanak ◽  
Nazila Amini
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
In Vitro Assessment

Devitrification of ionomer glass and its effect on the in vitro biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements

Biomaterials ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 3153-3160 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Hurrell-Gillingham ◽  
I.M Reaney ◽  
C.A Miller ◽  
A Crawford ◽  
P.V Hatton
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
In Vitro Biocompatibility
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document