scholarly journals FAILED SPINAL ANESTHESIA; THE INCIDENCE IN A POSTGRADUATE TEACHING HOSPITAL

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1527-1530
Author(s):  
Dr. Mobeen Ikram ◽  
Dr. Abdul Samee ◽  
Dr. Muhammad Amir ◽  
Dr. Muhammad Imdad
1968 ◽  
Vol 114 (516) ◽  
pp. 1441-1454 ◽  

In 1965 the Education Committee drew up a questionnaire on postgraduate teaching (prepared in a form suitable for I.B.M. punching) which was then circulated to every psychiatric hospital, psychiatric unit and teaching hospital in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, and to those hospitals abroad recognized by the Conjoint Board as providing training for the D.P.M. The questionnaires were sent out late in 1965, and after two sets of reminders the returned results were processed by the Tabulating Research Centre at Hampstead. Regrettably, the Centre, although providing a great deal of information very quickly, delayed for almost a year completing the processing of the data.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1527-1530
Author(s):  
Mobeen Ikram ◽  
Abdul Samee ◽  
Muhammad Amir ◽  
Muhammad Imdad

Objectives: To determine the frequency of failed spinal anesthesia in patientsundergoing caesarean section in a teaching hospital in Pakistan. Study Design: It was a cross– sectional study. Setting: Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management PAF HospitalSargodha. Period: January 2015 to May 2015. Methodology: A total of 293 pregnant patientsundergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included. After prehydration andessential monitoring, all patients were given spinal anesthesia with 25 G spinal needle at L3-L4 or L4-L5 level by 2nd year resident anesthesiologist under indirect supervision using 1.5 mlof hyperbaric spinal injection. Failure to achieve adequate block was managed by differentmodalities like sedation, analgesia with ketamine, repeat spinal anesthesia or to proceed withgeneral anesthesia. Results: Out of total of 293 patients, failed spinal occurred in 9 patients(3.07%). Out of these 9 patients, 02 patients (22.22%) were elective caesarean sections while07 cases (77.77%) were emergency caesarean sections. Conclusion: The chances of failedspinal anesthesia are more in emergency caesarean sections as compared to elective casesand failure rate of spinal anesthesia in PAF teaching hospital Sargodha is 3.07% which is slightlyhigher than 3%


2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 1301-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambrose Rukewe ◽  
Oluwaseun K. Adebayo ◽  
Akinola A. Fatiregun

Author(s):  
Mustafa Adnan Abdalrahman ◽  
Hassan Mohammed Abbas ◽  
Iyad Abbas Salman

Background: Hypotension is a very common consequence of the sympathetic vasomotor block caused by spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. Maternal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and dyspnea frequently accompany severe hypotension, and adverse effects on the fetus, including depressed Apgar scores and umbilical acidosis, have been correlated with severity and duration of hypotension. Aim: To investigate the effect of Ondansetron use on the prevention of hypotension and the amount of vasopressor needed to control the hypotension after spinal anesthesia. Methods: This is a prospective double blind, randomized trial carried out in Obstetric Operation room of Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical city, Iraq from November, 2018 to August, 2019. Total number of 128 women assessed for eligibility and only 87 were included and allocated into 2 groups. The Ondansetron group (45 women) received 6 mg Ondansetron IV e min before induction of spinal anesthesia. The Placebo group received 3 ml normal saline as placebo before induction. The number of rescue drugs (vasopressors, antiemetic, anti-shivering), vital signs and side effects were recorded each 3 minutes from baseline to 45th minute. Results: The incidence of hypotension, nausea, vomiting and the need for vasopressors and metoclopramide were significantly lower in Ondansetron group than placebo group (p = 0.001, 0.02, 0.003, < 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). Shivering and the need of pethidine for treating this side effect was non significantly lower in ondansetron group than placebo group. Conclusions: The preoperative administration of Ondansetron in cesarean section reduces the risk of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension, prevents the nausea and vomiting attacks and decreases the need to vasopressors and metoclopramide. Keywords: Spinal anesthesia, caesarian section, ondansetron, hypotension


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anum Khan ◽  
Muhammad Qasim Javed ◽  
Rabia Bilal ◽  
Rahul N Gaikwad

Objective: The objective of our audit was to assess the quality of lateral cephalometric radiographs by investigating the percentage of lateral cephalometric radiographic images that satisfied the good quality standards. Methods: The standard-based retrospective audit was conducted at Riphah International University, Pakistan, from April to September 2018. The sample size was 50 radiographs that were randomly selected from the radiographs taken over one year. The radiographs were graded according to the standards set by the National Radiation Protection Board by two evaluators after the necessary calibration. Moreover, the percentages of images that met the criteria set by the Royal College of Surgeons of England were identified. The data analysis was carried out by the SPSS software version 23. Results: Out of the 50 radiographs, thirty-one were Grade-I, sixteen were Grade-II and three radiographs were Grade-III. Furthermore, out of the criteria set by Royal College, one criterion met the 100% standard that was correct head positioning. Less frequent errors were comprised of poor visibility of soft tissue structures (16%), teeth not properly occluded (14%), Incorrect positioning of labels (12%), Sella and Nasion not visible (8%). According to the results of the quality assurance audit, the radiographs fell short of the required standards. Conclusion: Quality assurance by periodic auditing is important to yield radiographs with maximum diagnostic value, minimal errors, and avoid unnecessary radiation exposure by repeat radiographs. Recommendations were made for the formulation and implementation of comprehensive radiation protection regulations, at all the Dental institutes of Pakistan. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2796 How to cite this:Khan A, Javed MQ, Bilal R, Gaikwad RN. Retrospective quality assurance audit of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs at postgraduate teaching hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2796 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document