scholarly journals Relative oral bioavailability of three formulations of vitamin D3: An open-label, three-treatment study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnakumar M. Nandgaye ◽  
Rajaram S. Samant ◽  
Santoshi B. Kadam ◽  
Prashant J. Palkar
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Vitamin D3 ◽  
Relative Bioavailability ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Vitamin D2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bioequivalence Range ◽  
Optimal Values ◽  
The Mean

Background: Supplementation of vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 is recommended for vitamin D deficiency. Weekly supplementation of 60,000 IU of vitamin D3 increases serum 25(OH) D to optimal values. Various marketed forms of vitamin D3 include tablets, capsule, granules and oral solution. The main objective of this study is to compare the relative bioavailability of vitamin D3 oral solution with vitamin D3 tablet and capsule.Methods: This is an open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-treatment study to compare the relative bioavailability of vitamin D3 oral solution with capsule and tablet. Subjects (n=70) were supplemented with single dose of one of these formulations and their blood sample were assessed for Cmax, AUC0-28d and Tmax.Results: The logarithmic transformed data of pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed for 90% Confidence Intervals (CI) using ANOVA. The mean (90% CI) values of vitamin D3 oral solution against tablet for the ratio of Cmax and AUC0-28d were 113.00 (105.32-121.23) and 105.54 (97.95-113.72) respectively. The mean (90% CI) values of vitamin D3 oral solution against capsule for the ratio of Cmax and AUC0-28d were 115.02 (106.38 - 124.37) and 112.33 (104.44 - 120.81) respectively. These values were within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%.Conclusions: It is concluded that vitamin D3 Oral Solution formulated with nanotechnology is bioequivalent to vitamin D3 tablet and capsule. However, oral solution of vitamin D3 shows higher Cmax and AUC when compared to tablet and capsule formulations.

scholarly journals Bioequivalence of levamlodipine besylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: A single-dose and two-period crossover randomized study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Xin ◽  
Chenjing Wang ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Yanping Liu ◽  
Shuqin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Bioequivalence Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Healthy Chinese ◽  
Chinese Subjects

Abstract Background: Levamlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, has been show act as a cardiovascular drug. To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between levamlodipine (test formulation) at a single dose of 5 mg and amlodipine (reference formulation) at a single dose of 10 mg, the bioequivalence study was carried out.Methods: A single-dose randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was designed in healthy Chinese subjects. 48 subjects were divided into fasted and fed groups equally. The subjects randomly received the test or reference formulations at the rate of 1:1. Following a 21-day washout period, the alternative formulations were received. The blood samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 hours later. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was applied to determine the plasma concentrations of levamlodipine. Adverse events were recorded.Results: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratio of geometric means (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ under both fasted and fed conditions were within the prespecified bioequivalence limits between 80~125%. Under fasted conditions, 24 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean Cmax was (2.70±0.49) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (141.32±36.24) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (157.14±45.65) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 5 mg levamlodipine. The mean Cmax was (2.83±0.52) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (153.62±33.96) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (173.05±41.78) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 10 mg amlodipine. Under fed conditions, 24 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean Cmax was (2.73±0.55) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (166.93±49.96) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (190.99±70.89) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 5 mg levamlodipine. The mean Cmax was (2.87±0.81) ng/mL AUC0-t was (165.46±43.58) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (189.51±64.70) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 10 mg amlodipine. Serious adverse event was not observed.Conclusion: The trial confirmed that levamlodipine at a single dose of 5 mg and amlodipine at a single dose of 10 mg were bioequivalent under both fasted condition and fed condition.Trial registration: Cinicaltrials, NCT04411875. Registered 3 June 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009W1Q&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00050YQ&ts=3&cx=-6iqkm8

scholarly journals The Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Silymarin SMEDDS Formulation Study in Healthy Thai Volunteers

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuleegone Sornsuvit ◽  
Darunee Hongwiset ◽  
Songwut Yotsawimonwat ◽  
Manatchaya Toonkum ◽  
Satawat Thongsawat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Oral Bioavailability ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Rapid Absorption ◽  
The Mean

The present study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of silymarin 140 mg SMEDDS formulation. An open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study was conducted. Twelve healthy volunteers were included in the study. After the volunteers had fasted overnight for 10 h, a single-dose generic silymarin 140 mg SMEDDS soft capsule was administered. Then 10 ml blood samples were taken at 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.33, 1.67, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 12.0 h. The plasma silybin concentrations were analyzed using validated LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed and calculated. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated after silymarin had been administered as a single capsule. The mean (range) Cmax was 812.43 (259.47–1505.47) ng/ml at 0.80 (0.25–1.67) h (tmax). The mean (range) AUC0-t and AUC0-inf were 658.80 (268.29–1045.01) ng.h/ml and 676.98 (274.10–1050.96) ng.h/ml, respectively. The mean ke and t1/2 were 0.5386 h-1 and 1.91 h, respectively. The silymarin SMEDDS formulation soft capsule showed rapid absorption and high oral bioavailability.

scholarly journals Bioequivalence of levamlodipine besylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: A single-dose and two-period crossover randomized study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Xin ◽  
Chenjing Wang ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Yanping Liu ◽  
Shuqin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Bioequivalence Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Healthy Chinese ◽  
Chinese Subjects

Abstract Background: Levamlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, has been show act as a cardiovascular drug. To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between levamlodipine (test formulation) at a single dose of 5 mg and amlodipine (reference formulation) at a single dose of 10 mg, the bioequivalence study was carried out.Methods: A single-dose randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was designed in healthy Chinese subjects. 48 subjects were divided into fasted and fed groups equally. The subjects randomly received the test or reference formulations at the rate of 1:1. Following a 21-day washout period, the alternative formulations were received. The blood samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 hours later. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was applied to determine the plasma concentrations of levamlodipine. Adverse events were recorded.Results: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratio of geometric means (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ under both fasted and fed conditions were within the prespecified bioequivalence limits between 80~125%. Under fasted conditions, 24 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean Cmax was (2.70±0.49) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (141.32±36.24) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (157.14±45.65) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 5 mg levamlodipine. The mean Cmax was (2.83±0.52) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (153.62±33.96) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (173.05±41.78) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 10 mg amlodipine. Under fed conditions, 24 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean Cmax was (2.73±0.55) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (166.93±49.96) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (190.99±70.89) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 5 mg levamlodipine. The mean Cmax was (2.87±0.81) ng/mL AUC0-t was (165.46±43.58) ng×h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (189.51±64.70) ng×h/mL after a single dose of 10 mg amlodipine. Serious adverse event was not observed.Conclusion: The trial confirmed that levamlodipine at a single dose of 5 mg and amlodipine at a single dose of 10 mg were bioequivalent under both fasted condition and fed condition.Trial registration: Cinicaltrials, NCT04411875. Registered 3 June 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009W1Q&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00050YQ&ts=3&cx=-6iqkm8

scholarly journals Bioequivalence of levamlodipine besylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: a single-dose and two-period crossover randomized study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Chenjing Wang ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Yanping Liu ◽  
Shuqin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Bioequivalence Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Healthy Chinese ◽  
Chinese Subjects

Abstract Background Levamlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, has been show act as a cardiovascular drug. To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between levamlodipine (test formulation) at a single dose of 5 mg and amlodipine (reference formulation) at a single dose of 10 mg, the bioequivalence study was carried out. Methods A single-dose randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was designed in healthy Chinese subjects. 48 subjects were divided into fasted and fed groups equally. The subjects randomly received the test or reference formulations at the rate of 1:1. Following a 21-day washout period, the alternative formulations were received. The blood samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 h later. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was applied to determine the plasma concentrations of levamlodipine. Adverse events were recorded. Results The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratio of geometric means (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ under both fasted and fed conditions were within the prespecified bioequivalence limits between 80 ~ 125%. Under fasted conditions, 24 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean Cmax was (2.70 ± 0.49) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (141.32 ± 36.24) ng × h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (157.14 ± 45.65) ng × h/mL after a single dose of 5 mg levamlodipine. The mean Cmax was (2.83 ± 0.52) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (153.62 ± 33.96) ng × h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (173.05 ± 41.78) ng × h/mL after a single dose of 10 mg amlodipine. Under fed conditions, 24 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean Cmax was (2.73 ± 0.55) ng/mL, AUC0-t was (166.93 ± 49.96) ng × h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (190.99 ± 70.89) ng × h/mL after a single dose of 5 mg levamlodipine. The mean Cmax was (2.87 ± 0.81) ng/mL AUC0-t was (165.46 ± 43.58) ng × h/mL and AUC0-∞ was (189.51 ± 64.70) ng × h/mL after a single dose of 10 mg amlodipine. Serious adverse event was not observed. Conclusion The trial confirmed that levamlodipine at a single dose of 5 mg and amlodipine at a single dose of 10 mg were bioequivalent under both fasted condition and fed condition. Trial registration Cinicaltrials, NCT04411875. Registered 3 June 2020 - Retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Wenzler ◽  
E. J. Ellis-Grosse ◽  
K. A. Rodvold
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Oral Administration ◽  
Relative Bioavailability ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Blood And Urine Samples ◽  
Study Support ◽  
Tract Infections

ABSTRACT The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) fosfomycin disodium (ZTI-01) and oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated after a single dose in 28 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received a single 1-h i.v. infusion of 1 g and 8 g fosfomycin disodium and a single dose of 3 g oral fosfomycin tromethamine in a phase I, randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study. Serial blood and urine samples were collected before and up to 48 h after dosing. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters ± standard deviations of fosfomycin in plasma after 1 g and 8 g i.v., respectively, were the following: maximum clearance of drug in serum (C max), 44.3 ± 7.6 and 370 ± 61.9 μg/ml; time to maximum concentration of drug in serum (T max), 1.1 ± 0.05 and 1.08 ± 0.01 h; volume of distribution (V), 29.7 ± 5.7 and 31.5 ± 10.4 liters; clearance (CL), 8.7 ± 1.7 and 7.8 ± 1.4 liters/h; renal clearance (CLR), 6.6 ± 1.9 and 6.3 ± 1.6 liters/h; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞), 120 ± 28.5 and 1,060 ± 192 μg·h/ml; and half-life (t 1/2), 2.4 ± 0.4 and 2.8 ± 0.6 h. After oral administration, the parameters were the following: C max, 26.8 ± 6.4 μg/ml; T max, 2.25 ± 0.4 h; V/F, 204 ± 70.7 liters; CL/F, 17 ± 4.7 liters/h; CLR, 6.5 ± 1.8 liters/h; AUC0–∞, 191 ± 57.6 μg · h/ml; and t 1/2, 9.04 ± 4.5 h. The percent relative bioavailability of orally administered fosfomycin was 52.8% in relation to the 1-g i.v. dose. Approximately 74% and 80% of the 1-g and 8-g i.v. doses were excreted unchanged in the urine by 48 h compared to 37% after oral administration, with the majority of this excretion occurring by 12 h regardless of dosage form. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The results of this study support further investigation of i.v. fosfomycin in the target patient population, including patients with complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis.

scholarly journals The relative bioavailability of two formulations containing 10 mg Dapagliflozin assessed under fasting conditions in a randomized crossover study in healthy Caucasian subjects

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Monica Oroian ◽  
Diana Ioana Pop ◽  
Ana-Maria Gheldiu ◽  
Sandeep Bhardwaj ◽  
Adriana Marcovici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Reference Product ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Relative Bioavailability ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industries

AbstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative bioavailability of two formulations containing 10 mg dapagliflozin in healthy Caucasian subjects under fasting conditions.Materials and Methods: Forty-eight healthy Caucasian subjects were enrolled in a single-dose, crossover, balanced, open label, randomized clinical trial, with two treatment, two periods and two sequences. The wash-out period was of 7 days and thirty-eight subjects completed both study periods. Each subject received a single dose of 10 mg dapagliflozin as the reference product Farxiga® (AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, USA) and the test product developed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, India. Dapagliflozin plasma levels were determined from blood samples collected in both study periods before and after dosing until 48 hours by using a validated LC-MS/MS method. For pharmacokinetic analysis of data, the non-compartmental method was used (Phoenix® WinNonlin 6.3). The statistical analysis was performed by SAS software 9.1.3 for the logarithmically transformed values of maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve.Results: The 90% confidence intervals for the evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters were found to be in the accepted interval for bioequivalence (80.00-125.00%).Conclusion: The 10 mg dapagliflozin immediate release tablet newly developed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, India, is bioequivalent with the reference product Farxiga® under fasted state of the subjects.

Rectal Administration of Ibuprofen: Comparison of Enema and Suppository Form

Drug Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budi Prasaja ◽  
Yahdiana Harahap ◽  
Monika Sandra ◽  
Irene Iskandar ◽  
Windy Lusthom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Rectal Administration ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Anova Model ◽  
Equal Dose ◽  
Rate Of Absorption ◽  
The Mean

AbstractIbuprofen is a widely used and well-tolerated analgesic and antipyretic. It is desirable to have a formulation with a rapid rate of absorption because it is required for rapid pain relief and temperature reduction. Previous studies have described the pharmacokinetic profiles of ibuprofen suppository and the mean peak times of ibuprofen suppository were around 1.8 hours, indicating a slower rate of absorption. The aim of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of rectal administration of ibuprofen between enema and suppository form in order to provide evidence for the faster absorption rates of ibuprofen enema. This study was a phase-1 clinical study, open-label, randomized and two-way crossover with one-week washout period comparing the absorption profile of equal dose of ibuprofen administered rectally in two treatment phases: ibuprofen suppository and enema. Blood samples were collected post dose for pharmacokinetic analyses. Tmax was analyzed using a Wilcoxon matched paired test. A standard ANOVA model, appropriate for bioequivalence studies was used and ratios of 90% confidence intervals were calculated. This study showed that Tmax for ibuprofen enema was less than half that of ibuprofen suppository (median 40 min vs. 90 min, respectively; p-value=0.0003). Cmax and AUC0–12 for ibuprofen enema were bioequivalent to ibuprofen suppository, as the ratio of test/reference=104.52%, 90% CI 93.41–116.95% and the ratio of test/reference=98.12%, 90%CI 93.34–103.16%, respectively, which fell within 80–125% bioequivalence limit. The overall extent of absorption was similar to the both, which were all well tolerated. In terms of Tmax, Ibuprofen enema was absorbed twice as quickly as from ibuprofen suppository. Therefore it is expected that an ibuprofen enema may provide faster onset of analgesic and antipyretic benefit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document