scholarly journals Obstetric and neonatal outcome among women presenting with reduced fetal movements in third trimester

Author(s):  
Vidyashree G. Poojari ◽  
Sahan S. Kumar ◽  
Akhila Vasudeva

Background: Reduced maternal perception of fetal movements allows early identification, timely evaluation and intervention for fetuses at risk of adverse outcome. The primary objective of this study was to assess the pregnancy characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women presenting to hospital with reduced fetal movements (RFM).Methods: Prospective observational study, recruiting all women with singleton pregnancy at or beyond 28 weeks of gestation presenting with a subjective perception of RFM from April 2015 to December 2016. Maternal characteristics, antenatal risk factors, management pathways and perinatal outcome studied.Results: 47% belonged to high risk pregnancy. Among high risk women, although only 39% showed poor BPP at the first presentation, 58% were delivered irrespective of their gestational age, out of which 32.75% had poor neonatal outcome. Among low risk who had >2 episodes of RFM, 50% had poor neonatal outcome. 7% among high risk pregnancies and 18% among low risk, presented with RFM within 48 hours following steroid prophylaxis.24% of high risk women showed liquor volume abnormalities as compared to low risk (6.3%).Conclusions: Significant proportion of those with RFM belonged to high risk pregnancy. Among high risk group, there were high rates of stillbirth and poor BPP at the time of admission when compared to low risk group. Due to early approach to the hospital and timely intervention, significant women with abnormal BPP had good perinatal outcome. All those fetuses who were delivered on first episode of RFM in low risk group did not show evidence of compromise at birth, probably indicating unnecessary delivery. More than 2 episodes of RFM even among low risk group seems significant as good number of fetuses were compromised at birth. Steroids prophylaxis for the fetal lung maturity causes transient changes in BPP, hence unnecessary delivery should be avoided especially those among low risk pregnancy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1565-1572
Author(s):  
Junu Shrestha ◽  
Sangeeta Devi Gurung ◽  
Anjali Subedi ◽  
Chandani Pandey

Introduction: Identification of high risk pregnancy can be done by using various scoring systems which is highly predictive in determining maternal and perinatal outcome. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to identify high- risk pregnancy and to compare the maternal and perinatal outcome of high-risk with low-risk pregnancies. Methodology: This study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, from 1st August 2020 to 31st January 2021. Study included pregnant women coming for delivery after 28 weeks of gestation.  Antenatal scoring system involving various risk factors, was used to stratify women as low-risk (score 0-3), high-risk (score 4-6) and extremely high-risk group ( score ≥7). All women were followed up in intrapartum and postpartum period and complications noted. Neonates were also followed up. Maternal and perinatal outcome of three groups were compared. Results: There were 67.3% women in low-risk, 20% in high-risk and 12.7% in  extremely high-risk groups. Operative deliveries were 89.9% in extremely high- risk, 77.9% in high- risk as compared to 51% in low- risk group. Maternal complications, total amount of blood loss and duration of hospital stay was more in extremely high-risk and high-risk pregnancies. Low birth weight was more common in extremely high risk (60%) and high-risk (26%) pregnancies compared to low- risk pregnancies (15%). Neonates with low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were more in high-risk pregnancies. Thirty-two percent neonates in extremely high-risk pregnancy required neonatal intensive care admission which was significantly higher as compared to high-risk and low-risk pregnancies. Perinatal deaths were more frequent in extremely high-risk pregnancies. Conclusions: Identifying high risk pregnancy using scoring system is useful to identify women at risk of developing maternal and perinatal complications. 


Author(s):  
Martina Smorti ◽  
Francesca Ginobbi ◽  
Tommaso Simoncini ◽  
Federica Pancetti ◽  
Alessia Carducci ◽  
...  

AbstractLiterature has shown that hospitalized women with high-risk pregnancy tend to develop anxious and depressive symptoms. Research has used quantitative or qualitative methods. By integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study aims to analyze: a) the level of depression, anxiety, and pregnancy-related anxiety in a group of women hospitalized with high-risk pregnancy (hospitalized high-risk) compared with a group of non-hospitalized women with low-risk pregnancy; b) the content of hospitalization-related emotions in a high-risk group. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 hospitalized high-risk pregnant women and 32 women with low-risk pregnancy. Participants completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Anxiety), and Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire. The hospitalized high-risk group also completed open-ended questions about emotions experienced during hospitalization. Univariate Analysis of Covariance showed that the hospitalized high-risk group reported higher general anxiety and depression than the low-risk pregnancy group. Low-risk group reported higher level of concerns about own appearance than high-risk group. Narratives showed that the anxious and depressive symptoms of hospitalized women are related to the loneliness of being away from family. Despite attempts to understand hospitalization, they express concerns about pregnancy. Psychological support for hospitalized pregnant women should be provided to facilitate the communication of emotions that leads women to elaborate the experience of hospitalization to better adapt and cope with the critical condition.


Author(s):  
Shobha S. Pillai ◽  
Swapna Mohan

Background: High-risk pregnancy is one in which the mother, foetus or the newborn has an elevated risk of experiencing an adverse outcome. These high-risk women form a special vulnerable cohort that can be identified in the antenatal period using a simple, easy to use, cost-effective tool- a maternal risk scoring system. Early identification of these high-risk mothers will facilitate effective intervention strategies to deal with the complications.Methods: This study was carried out on 300 pregnant women with gestational age more than 28 weeks. Detailed history, examination and necessary investigations were done and then using the Modified Coopland scoring system, each pregnant woman was assigned a risk score and stratified into 3 risk groups- low risk (0-3), moderate risk (4-6) and high risk (≥7) and followed up till delivery and 7 days postpartum. Subsequently, the maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared with their respective scores.Results: In this study, 14.66% patients belonged to the high-risk category. Statistically, a significant difference was noted in the number of low-birth-weight babies, in 5 minutes APGAR score <7 and in NICU admissions in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group. Overall perinatal mortality was 13.33/1000 live births. In the high-risk group, a significant difference was seen in the occurrence of PPH and the need for operative delivery.Conclusions: Significant association between high-risk pregnancy and the poor maternal and perinatal outcome was noted. Therefore, a simple, cost-effective high-risk pregnancy scoring system such as the one proposed in this study can be used to identify potential high-risk pregnancies, provide them with tertiary care facilities and also corrective measures can be undertaken to prevent or minimize the complicating factors.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e048048
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Powell ◽  
Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera ◽  
Blair Darney

ObjectiveWe tested whether women who reported high-risk pregnancies or deliveries were more likely to receive immediate postpartum contraception prior to discharge compared with normal-risk women in Mexico.MethodsThis is a retrospective study using the National Health and Nutrition Survey. We classified women as high-risk based on reported complications in pregnancy and delivery. We used multivariable logistic regression to test the association of high-risk status and receipt of postpartum contraception (any modern method and Tier one methods) prior to discharge.ResultsOur sample included 5030 deliveries (population N=3 923 657). Overall, 19.1% of the sample were high risk. Over 60% of women in the high-risk and normal-risk group received immediate postpartum contraception, but a greater proportion of high-risk women received a method (67% vs 61% normal risk; p<0.001). However, in multivariable models, there were no significant differences in receipt of any modern method or tier 1 method by risk group.ConclusionWomen with high-risk pregnancies were not more likely to receive postpartum contraception than the normal-risk group, once accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Prenatal and postpartum contraception counselling should address the health effects of high-risk pregnancies and interpregnancy intervals to improve maternal health outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-191
Author(s):  
Hiral Parekh ◽  
Sneha Chaudhari

This was a prospective study conducted in pregnant patients with high risk factors who got admitted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Care Hospital, Jamnagar during the period from May 2018 to September 2020. Background: High-risk pregnancies causes many adverse perinatal outcomes. Doppler ultrasound is a non-invasive technique to study the feto-maternal circulation to guide the clinical management. Objective: This study aims at evaluating the role of colour Doppler in high-risk pregnancies and their perinatal outcome. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study carried out for 29 months in the Department of Radiology with antenatal women in the age group of 18-35 years with singleton pregnancy of gestational age of <28 weeks to >35 weeks having high-risk factors considered in study. The risk factors considered were pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes, anemia, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios and IUGR. Doppler study of umbilical artery and fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) arteries was done and amniotic fluid index (AFI) was measured. Parameters in the form of resistive index, pulsatility index, and systolic/diastolic ratio were taken. obstetric history was taken with regular interval follow up. Results: The study was carried out with 50 patients. High-risk pregnancy was more common in the age group of 21-25 years. The most common high-risk factor in pregnancy was oligohydramnios which accounted for 30% of cases. Out of 50 high-risk pregnancies, 5 (10 %) of cases resulted in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Out of 50 high-risk cases, in 36 cases, umbilical artery findings were abnormal. 3 patients had intrauterine death (IUD) and 27 patients had poor perinatal outcome. Umbilical artery abnormality showed significant sensitivity and negative predictive value for adverse (poor + IUD) perinatal. Correlation was seen between high risk pregnancy and need of emergency caesarean section and induction and associated adverse perinatal outcome. Conclusion: Combination of different arterial waveform study enhance the diagnostic accuracy in identifying those intrauterine growth restricted foetuses that were at risk. Keywords: Colour Doppler, high risk pregnancy, perinatal outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R I Sava ◽  
Y Chen ◽  
Y K Taha ◽  
Y Gong ◽  
S M Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hypertension (HTN) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are a prevalent combination in women, however limited data are available to guide blood pressure (BP) management. We hypothesize older women with HTN and CAD may not derive the same prognostic benefit from systolic BP (SBP) lowering <130 mmHg. Purpose To investigate the long-term mortality implications of different achieved SBP levels in hypertensive women with CAD. Methods Long-term, all-cause mortality data were analyzed for 9216 women, stratified by risk attributable to clinical severity of CAD (women with prior myocardial infarction or revascularization considered at high, all others at low risk) and by age (50 - <65 or ≥65 yo). The prognostic impact of achieving mean in-trial SBP <130 (referent group) was compared with 130 to <140 and ≥140 mmHg using Cox proportional hazards, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results During 108,838 person-years of follow-up, 2945 deaths occurred. High risk women (n=3011) had increased long-term mortality in comparison to low risk women (n=6205) (adjusted HR 1.38, CI 1.28–1.5, p<0.001). Within risk groups, crude mortality percentages decreased according to BP values (table). As expected, high risk women were more likely to be ≥65 yo (68.68% vs. 50.51%, p<0.0001) or have SBP ≥140 mmHg (43.08% vs. 31.18%, p<0.0001). In adjusted analyses, an SBP ≥140 mmHg was associated with worse outcomes than SBP <130 mmHg in the entire cohort (HR 1.3, CI 1.2–1.5, p<0.0001) and when stratifying by risk (low risk group, HR = 1.47, CI 1.28–1.7, p<0.0001; high risk group, HR = 1.71, CI 1.01–1.35, p=0.03). In analyses stratified by age and risk, women ≥65 years and at high risk had decreased mortality in the 130 - <140 SBP category vs. <130 mmHg (HR 0.812, 95% CI 0.689–0.957, p=0.0133; figure). Women and deaths by risk and SBP group Group SBP category Women (n) Mortality (n) Mortality (%) High risk <130 773 338 44 130–<140 941 414 44 ≥140 1297 694 54 Low risk <130 2187 390 18 130–<140 2083 451 22 ≥140 1935 658 34 SBP = systolic blood pressure; n = number; % = percent per each group. Mortality adjusted HRs Conclusion In women ≥65 yo with hypertension and prior myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization enrolled in INVEST, a SBP between 130 to <140 mmHg was associated with lower all-cause, long-term mortality versus SBP <130 mmHg. Acknowledgement/Funding The main INVEST (International Verapamil [SR]/Trandolapril Study) was funded by grants from BASF Pharma, Ludwigshafen, Germany; Abbott Laboratories, A


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hema Dhumale ◽  
Yeshita Pujar ◽  
Komal Gurunath Revankar

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the role of routine third trimester ultrasound in low-risk pregnancy on antenatal interventions and perinatal outcome. Design Randomized controlled study. Setting KLES Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Center, Belgaum. Subjects A total of 290 low-risk pregnant women between 34 and 37 weeks attending antenatal clinic and fulfilling inclusion criteria were allotted using computer-generated randomization numbers into study and control groups. Intervention In study group, third trimester ultrasound was performed to assess fetal growth, amniotic fluid index (AFI), malpresentations, and late onset fetal anomalies. In control group, no routine ultrasound was performed, unless indicated by clinical suspicion during subsequent visits. High-risk fetuses identified were managed as per the standard protocol. All women were followed to assess antenatal interventions, intrapartum events and perinatal outcome. Results Detection of high-risk fetuses antenatally in study and control groups was 17.25 and 2.07% respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p = —0.0001). Rates of antenatal interventions among study and control were 24.8 and 4.44% respectively. Prevalence of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses among study and control was 6.9 vs 11.03% respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p = —0.253). There was no statistical difference in adverse intrapartum events, cesarean section rate for nonreassuring cardiotocography (CTG), low Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions among study and controls. Conclusion Routine third trimester ultrasound is a logical solution for detection of high-risk fetuses in low-risk pregnancies which would otherwise be missed by clinical examination. However, this leads to an increase in antenatal interventions without significantly influencing the perinatal outcome. How to cite this article Revankar KG, Dhumale H, Pujar Y. A Randomized Controlled Study to assess the Role of Routine Third Trimester Ultrasound in Low-risk Pregnancy on Antenatal Interventions and Perinatal Outcome. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2014;6(3):139-143.


1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Sadovsky ◽  
D. Weinstein ◽  
W. Z. Polishuk

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (43) ◽  
pp. 4603-4608
Author(s):  
Harshika Singh ◽  
Manjusha Agrawal ◽  
Arvind Bhake ◽  
Nihar Gupta

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Karishma Gandhi ◽  
Ishit Shah ◽  
Ram Kumar Patidar

Background: High risk pregnancy needs special antepartum as well as intrapartum care and investigations. CTG is aadmissionscreening test to monitor fetal wellbeing by use of cardiotocograph. It monitors fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. Color Doppler is ultrasound dependent test which uses vascular flow velocities and Doppler waveform to predict fetal outcome. Objective: Comparison of efficiency of CTG & Color Doppler ultrasound for intrapartum fetal surveillance in high risk pregnancy. Methods: Retrospective study of 100 high risk pregnancies of ≥ 34 weeks POG in labor with CTG and color Doppler findings were done on admission at Gujarat Adani Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhuj. Subjects were classified into 4 groups based on CTG and color Doppler findings. Maternal and fetal outcome were recorded and correlated with CTGand color Dopplerfindings. Results: Most common cause of high-risk pregnancy was preeclampsia(n=60/100,60%).In our study, rate of normal delivery was 40% and c-section was 60% (31% elective & 29% emergency). Out of 100 fetuses, 76 were healthy, 22 were admitted in NICU (6 NICU deaths) and 2 were still birth. Perinatal outcome was most favorable with normal CTG and Color doppler and was least favorable with both of them abnormal. Outcome was intermittent in other two groups. CTG found to have sensitivity 62.5% and specificity 82.5% in detection of adverse fetal outcome. Similarly,sensitivity and specificity of color doppler was 48.8% and 98.6% respectively. Conclusions: In our study it was found that CTG is more sensitive and color Doppler is more specific in detection of adverse fetal outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document