scholarly journals Incidence of thrombophilia in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss

Author(s):  
Ganesh Bharaswadkar

Background: Approximately 1-3% of women of reproductive age suffer from recurrent pregnancy loss. Objective of this study was to evaluate the association between recurrent pregnancy loss and thrombophilia.Methods: This is a descriptive study, involving retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent pregnancy losses. Patients with recurrent pregnancy loss in whom associated morbidity factors were excluded underwent screening for both acquired and inherited thrombophilia.Results: A total of 20 patients were screened for acquired and inherited thrombophilia with recurrent pregnancy loss. Thrombophilia was diagnosed in 70% cases. Out of which, anticardiolipin antibodies was found positive in 57% of patients, protein C 7% and protein S deficiency was observed in 35% cases.Conclusions: Thrombophilias are associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Patients in whom other associated morbid factors are excluded, should be offered screening for thrombophilia. Multidisciplinary management involving hematologist is vital for management.

Author(s):  
Neha Agrawal ◽  
Navdeep Ghuman ◽  
Pratibha Singh ◽  
Priyanka Kathuria

The pregnancy is an immunocompromised state. Thus, autoimmune diseases may affect pregnancy and get worsen during pregnancy. Here authors discuss a rare autoimmune thrombophilia disorder, protein C and S deficiency which may cause recurrent pregnancy losses by affecting haemostatic mechanisms in the body. This patient with recurrent pregnancy loss when evaluated extensively was found to have combined inherited protein C and S deficiency. It was successfully managed with thromboprophylaxis therapy, which resulted in the delivery of healthy baby. Long term anticoagulant prophylaxis should be considered weighing the risk of bleeding to thrombotic recurrence in such cases. In conclusion, combined protein C and S deficiency and that too presenting as recurrent pregnancy loss is very rare. Thrombophilia screening should be considered in cases of recurrent pregnancy losses. Adequate and appropriate thromboprophylaxis is an important part of the management of pregnant women with inherited thrombophilia.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Brenner

IntroductionA successful pregnancy is dependent on the development of adequate placental circulation. Abnormalities of placental vasculature may result in a number of gestational pathologies, including first and second trimester miscarriages, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), placental abruption, and preeclampsia.1 Approximately 5% of women experience two or more consecutive abortions. Habitual abortions, defined as three or more spontaneous recurrent pregnancy losses, may affect as many as 1% to 2% of women of reproductive age. The discovery of an association between recurrent pregnancy loss, and antiphospholipid antibodies, specifically lupus anticoagulant, and anticardiolipin antibodies increased interest in a possible acquired thrombotic autoimmune cause.The inherited thrombophilias are a group of genetic disorders of blood coagulation resulting in an increased risk of thrombosis. Today, a full understanding of the inherited thrombophilias is becoming increasingly important in the management of high-risk gestations. Several reports over the last three years have suggested that not only are these disorders associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic disease during pregnancy and puerperium, but they are also associated with an increased incidence of vascular pathologies, resulting in poor gestational outcome.2 This review will cover recent data concerning thrombophilia and vascular placental pathology, potential pathophysiologic mechanisms for this association, and available therapeutic modalities for prevention of placental vascular thrombosis in order to maximize successful gestational outcome.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4056-4056
Author(s):  
Serguei A. Castaneda ◽  
Henry Cardona ◽  
Walter Cardona ◽  
Leonor Alvarez ◽  
Joaquin Gomez ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Several genetic defects of coagulation factors have been implicated as a possible cause of recurrent pregnancy loss in Caucasians. The role of inherited thrombophilia as a risk factor in populations of Hispanic origin affected with this clinical condition is unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted to evaluate this genetic predisposition in Hispanics. Objective: To assess association between recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilias: factor V G1691A (FV Leiden), prothrombin G20210A (FII G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR C677T), activated protein C resistance (APC resistance), and deficiencies of antithrombin III (AT-III) and protein C (PC). Patients and methods: This ongoing case-control study investigates a tri-ethnic population of Hispanic origin from Medellin, Colombia. Inherited thrombophilia was studied in 76 recurrent pregnancy loss patients according to Sixth ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy (three or more miscarriages, and either second-trimester losses or gestational vascular complications). The control group included 117 healthy women (two or more children, and no more than one miscarriage). Polymorphisms were genotyped by PCR-RFLP. APC resistance and deficiencies of AT-III, and PC were evaluated using commercial kits (IL Test™ APC™ Resistance V, Antithrombin™, and Proclot™). Sample size of 100 patients and 200 controls was determined to have 80% statistical power to discriminate association. Results: The prevalence of any inherited thrombophilia in this patient cohort was 17%, and 25% in controls (OR 1.16, CI 0.6–2.29). No statistically significant differences in any genetic thrombophilia frequency between patients and healthy controls were observed. FV Leiden and FII G20210A were both positive in one patient and one control (OR 1.55, CI 0–57.5, for both thrombophilic defects). In the patient group 13.2% homozygous carriers with MTHFR 677T were found, as compared to 22.2% among controls (OR 0.53, CI 0.22–1.25). The odds ratio for the association between recurrent pregnancy loss and APC resistance was 0.77 (CI 0.32–4.2). The inheritance of AT-III deficiency or PC deficiency was not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. AT-III deficiency was not detected in patients and was found in only one control. Furthermore, one patient was defined as PC deficiency carrier while none were found in the control group. Conclusion: Our preliminary results found no association between recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilia in this population originated by admixture of Amerinds, Europeans, and Africans, such as the American population denominated Hispanic. Base on our current data analysis, we do not expect to find any association even with the planned larger sample size. This suggests that inherited thrombophilia might not play a main role in Hispanic populations affected with this clinical condition. Given these results, appears to be insufficient evidence to include inherited thrombophilia in the initial evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss in this population group, and possibly Hispanic patients in America. We suggest it is important to look for other, more common, causes of recurrent miscarriage in the evaluation of this group of patients. These data suggest an important ethnic difference between this population and Caucasians.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Mohamed Elgari ◽  
Nadir Ahmed Ibrahim ◽  
Abdel Rahim Mahmoud Muddathir ◽  
Faris Mergheni Eltoom ◽  
Ibrahim M Ibrahim

AbstractThrombophilia may be anticipated by single or combined hereditary defects in encoding genes factor V, Prothrombin, and MTHFR. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and associated risks of V Leiden (G1691A), Prothrombin (G20210A), and MTHFR (C677T) mutations in Saudi women with Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Protein C and protein S activity were measured to determine combined effects, if any. We examined 60 women with a history of DVT and 60 with RPL, extracted DNA from EDTA blood and determined three mutations by using multiplex PCR reactions followed by Strip Assay KIT. Pro C Global assay was used to determine the cutoff value [PCATNR = 0.80]. Protein C/S chromogenic assay was used to estimate protein C and S percentages. Frequency of Factor V Leiden G/A genotype in patients with DVT 7 (11.6%) had a significant association for DVT χ2 (OR = 5.1, P = 0.03). In women with RPL the three mutations did not show any significant association, levels of Protein C, protein S and PCAT-NR in patient groups not different from controls (P > 0.05). In conclusion, we recommend expanding on these data to provide larger-scale studies.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5124-5124
Author(s):  
Khalil Al Farsi ◽  
Shoaib Al Zadjali ◽  
Karima Al Falahi ◽  
Murtadha K. Al-Khabori ◽  
Anil Pathare ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5124 Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common clinical problem. Inherited thrombophilia has been reported to be associated with RPL by different groups. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of women who had thrombophilia testing for RPL, defined as 2 or more pregnancy losses, between the period of June 2006 and June 2010. The following thrombophilic disorders were included: protein C deficiency (PC), protein S deficiency (PS), anti-thrombin deficiency (AT), activated protein C resistance (APCR) and more recently, as molecular testing became available at our institution, factor V G1691A (FVL), prothrombin G20210A (PTG) and Methyl tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHRF) mutations. Women were excluded if testing was only done during pregnancy or in the immediate post-partum period. Results: A total of 136 women were identified. Median age was 32 (range: 18–44) with a median number of RPL of 3 (range: 2–11). Median number of first trimester losses was 2 (range 0–11). Two women had only second trimester losses and one had only third trimester losses. PS deficiency was identified in 8 women (5.8%), PC deficiency in 3 (2.2%), AT deficiency in 1 (0.7%) and APCR in 1 (0.7%). Of 30 women who had genetic analysis by PCR, 8 had abnormal results (MTHFR: 4 heterozygous, 1 homozygous; FVL: 2 heterozygous and PTG: 1 heterozygous). We did not find any correlation between the number of RPLs and the finding of a positive thrombophilia screen in the overall group or in the group of women who had molecular testing. Conclusion: Inherited thrombophilia is not as common in our patient population as described in other groups. However, a prospective study with a control group and a full panel of thrombophilia testing is needed to assess the prevalence and significance of such defects in women with RPL. Disclosures: Pathare: Sultan Qaboos University: Employment, Research Funding. Alkindi:Sultan Qaboos University: Employment, Research Funding.


Genetika ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iva Pruner ◽  
Valentina Djordjevic ◽  
Maja Gvozdenov ◽  
Branko Tomic ◽  
Mirjana Kovac ◽  
...  

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a health problem affecting up to 5% of women of reproductive age. Several thrombophilic risk factors might contribute to RPL.To investigate relationship between a novel C20068T gene variant in the 3` end of prothrombin gene and RPL, we tested 153 women with RPL and 111 controls for the presence of this gene variant. In patients, we have detected four heterozygous (2.61%) and no homozygous carriers. In controls, no carriers were detected. Our results indicate higher prevalence of C20068T gene variant in women with RPL but this difference was not statistically significant. However, in patients who suffered 5 or more RPL, frequency of C20068T gene variant was significantly increased compared to controls (12.5% vs. 0%, P=0.02). This is the first study which points out a possible role of C20068T gene variant in etiology of RPL, but larger studies should be carried out to confirm our findings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Nanae Shinozaki ◽  
Yasuhiko Ebina ◽  
Masashi Deguchi ◽  
Kenji Tanimura ◽  
Mayumi Morizane ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document