scholarly journals Ademetionine in patients with liver disease: a review

Author(s):  
Sanjiv Saigal ◽  
Dharmesh Kapoor ◽  
Dyotona Sen Roy

The aim of the present review is to have an in-depth analysis of the published scientific literature relating to the clinical use of ademetionine in various etiologies of liver disease. Literature search was performed using electronic databases like Pubmed/Medline/others to identify studies on ademetionine in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, drug induced liver injury and viral hepatitis. Ademetionine has been studied in various etiologies of liver disease with varying dosing and durations. In patients with chronic and alcoholic liver disease, ademetionine was found to be beneficial in improving liver enzyme levels, increasing glutathione levels, improving signs and symptoms of fatigue, pruritus and jaundice. Positive effects of ademetionine therapy have also been documented in multiple studies in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, with improvements observed in triglyceride, total cholesterol, alanine transaminase and asprtate transaminase levels and ultrasound grading of fatty change. In patients with drug induced liver injury, improvements were observed in liver biochemical markers and symptoms such as pruritus, fatigue and jaundice. Ademetionine has also been studied in patients with viral hepatitis with improvement in laboratory markers and signs and symptoms. Published data suggest that there is clinical evidence to substantiate the use of ademetionine across indications. Its use has resulted in sustained improvement in biochemical markers; signs and symptoms of liver disease has been observed in both acute and chronic liver disease. Further data is warranted through clinical studies to focus on specific end points of therapy areas, in existing and new indications.

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-520
Author(s):  
Karina L. Raikhelson ◽  
Elina A. Kondrashina ◽  
Ekaterina V. Pazenko

In this review, we discussed the epidemiological and pathogenetic aspects of mixed steatohepatitis (SH), developed due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic associated fatty liver disease, drug-induced liver injury. We discussed the mechanisms of the mutually aggravating influence of etiological factors. Drugs can cause steatosis and SH, as well as contribute to the progressive course of existing SH, primarily of metabolic origin. The issues of interaction of pathogenetic factors, peculiarities of diagnostics and perspectives of pathogenetic and symptomatic treatment are considered. Therapy of mixed SH is based on avoidance of hepatotoxic drugs and lifestyle modification, medications with demonstrated efficacy (such as ademetionine) in certain SH might be used.


Author(s):  
Goran Bokan ◽  
Nikola Malešević ◽  
Anna Licata ◽  
Zoran Mavija

This review article includes a review of the latest literature searched on PubMed in the field of hepatotoxicity caused by drugs that have a wide daily application. The concept of the review article consists of several parts dealing with the definition of drugs induced liver injury - DILI, diagnostic challenges related to it, and the clinical spectrum of liver disease, with an emphasis on the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - NAFLD and review of drugs involved in formation of NAFLD.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1431-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud Lemoine ◽  
Vlad Ratziu ◽  
Minji Kim ◽  
Mustapha Maachi ◽  
Dominique Wendum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-603
Author(s):  
Igor V. Maev ◽  
Alexey O. Bueverov ◽  
Artem V. Volnukhin

Background. Drug treatment of non-alcoholic fatty and alcoholic liver disease remains an urgent, unsolved problem. Due to the commonality of many pathogenetic mechanisms and predictors of progression, a universal approach to the search for a therapeutic agent can be considered. Aims pooled analysis of the results of two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of a fixed combination of glycyrrhizic acid and essential phospholipids in two dosage forms to study its efficacy and safety in non-alcoholic fatty and alcoholic liver disease, in the presence and absence of predictors of disease progression. Methods. The pooled analysis included 180 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Gepard study) and 120 patients with alcoholic liver disease (Jaguar study). Patients of the main group received a fixed combination of 5.0 g intravenous jet 3 times a week for the first 2 weeks; then 2 capsules 3 times a day for the next 10 weeks. Patients in the control group received placebo according to the same scheme. The total duration of treatment was 12 weeks in the Gepard study (1 course of stepwise therapy) and 24 weeks in the Jaguar study (2 courses of stepwise therapy). A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of a fixed combination and a placebo was carried out, in the presence and absence of predictors of progression, separately for each nosology and in a mixed sample. Results. In patients with non-alcoholic fatty and alcoholic liver disease who received the fixed combination, in contrast to the placebo group, there was a statistically more significant decrease in the level of biochemical markers of inflammation alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, adiponectin, and the value of the AktiTest index. There was no negative trend in the NAFLD fibrosis score; more significant positive dynamics of FibroTest is shown. Predictors of disease progression hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, age did not have a negative impact on the results in the study group. The efficacy of the study drug was noted in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and normal body weight; data were obtained indicating its possible effectiveness with a high activity of the inflammatory process associated with alcoholic liver damage. The frequency of adverse events in the study and control groups was comparable. Conclusions. Based on a generalized analysis of the results of two studies, promising directions for the study and use of a fixed combination of glycyrrhizic acid and essential phospholipids were identified: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without obesity, alcoholic steatohepatitis of high activity (as an adjuvant); steatohepatitis of non-alcoholic and alcoholic etiology, combined with hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia.


Author(s):  
R. Mark Beattie ◽  
Anil Dhawan ◽  
John W.L. Puntis

Demographics 406Pathophysiology 406Differential diagnoses 407Presenting features 407Investigation 408Management 409Fatty liver disease is now increasingly recognized in children, particularly in the setting of obesity.The term non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) was first coined in 1980 by Ludwig to describe a pattern of liver injury in adults in which the liver histology was consistent with alcoholic hepatitis, but in whom significant alcohol consumption was denied. NASH can be considered as part of a broader spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease that extends from simple steatosis through steatohepatitis that is characterized by the potential to progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis and subsequent end stage liver disease....


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Silva ◽  
Beatriz S. Brito ◽  
Isaac Neri de N. Silva ◽  
Viviane G. Nóbrega ◽  
Maria Carolina S. M. da Silva ◽  
...  

Background. In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients there are reports of the occurrence of hepatobiliary manifestations, so the aim of this study was to evaluate the hepatobiliary manifestations in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) from an IBD reference center. Methods. Cross-sectional study in an IBD reference center, with interviews and review of medical charts, between July 2015 and August 2016. A questionnaire addressing epidemiological and clinical characteristics was used. Results. We interviewed 306 patients, and the majority had UC (53.9%) and were female (61.8%). Hepatobiliary manifestations were observed in 60 (19.6%) patients with IBD. In the greater part of the patients (56.7%) hepatobiliary disorders were detected after the diagnosis of IBD. In UC (18.2%) patients, the hepatobiliary disorders identified were 11 (6.7%) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 9 (5.5%) cholelithiasis, 6 (3.6%) primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), 3 (1.8%) hepatotoxicity associated with azathioprine, 1 (0.6%) hepatitis B, and 1 (0.6%) hepatic fibrosis. In CD (21.3%) patients, 11 (7.8%) had cholelithiasis, 11 (7.8%) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 4 (2.8%) PSC, 3 (2.1%) hepatotoxicity, 1 (0.7%) hepatitis B, (0.7%) hepatitis C, 1 (0.7%) alcoholic liver disease, and 1 (0.7%) autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). There was one case of PSC/AIH overlap syndrome. Conclusion. The frequency of hepatobiliary disorders was similar in both forms of IBD in patients evaluated. The most common nonspecific hepatobiliary manifestations in IBD patients were non-alcoholic liver disease and cholelithiasis. The most common specific hepatobiliary disorder was PSC in patients with extensive UC or ileocolonic CD involvement; this was seen more frequently in male patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document