scholarly journals Ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in acute appendicitis: Rural setup

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1546
Author(s):  
Yamanur P. Lamani ◽  
Bhimanagouda V. Goudar ◽  
Eshwar B. Kalburgi ◽  
Bheemappa K. Bhavi ◽  
Mohmmedgouse Karikazi

Background: Despite technological advances the diagnosis of appendicitis is still based primarily clinical assessment. The diagnosis of atypical appendicitis remains clinically challenging and is one of the most commonly missed problems in the emergency department. Ultrasonography is highly operator dependent with a consequently wide reported sensitivity range.Methods: This is a prospective study conducted in the department of surgery. All patients with right lower abdominal pain, admitted to HSK hospital Bagalkot, in whom acute appendicitis was suspected were analysed from January 2013 to June 2014.Results: In the present study appendix was visualized in 85% of the patients and periappendiceal collection was found in 7% of patients. Faecolith was found only in 1 case. Out of these 74 cases were uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Perforated acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 6 cases. One case was diagnosed as appendicular abscess and 4 cases were diagnosed as chronic appendicitis. Based on clinical assessment 4 patients were subjected to surgery after 48hours.Conclusions: Graded compression US remains our first line method in rural setup in the evaluation of patients referred with clinically suspected acute appendicitis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Liene Taurina ◽  
Zane Liepina ◽  
Astra Zviedre ◽  
Arnis Engelis ◽  
Aigars Petersons

SummaryIntroductionAcute appendicitis (AA) – acute inflammation and infection of the appendix – is one of the most common cause for abdominal surgery in pediatrics. Appendectomy has been the gold standard since 1735, but in recent years there have been several studies that investigate antibacterial therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. In 2016 new recommendations for suspected AA were implemented in emergency department setting of Children's Clinical University Hospital (CCUH).Aim of the StudyTo evaluate whether diagnostic criteria for patients with a suspected acute appendicitis is effective as a diagnostic tool and to evaluate whether dual antibacterial therapy is safe and effective as first line treatment for children with diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in CCUH.Material and methodsA retrospective study was made in CCUH from January 2017 to December 2017. Patients aged 7 to 18 with suspected uncomplicated acute appendicitis were identified and data were collected from an internal hospital management system and patients’ medical records. Patients were divided into two groups – A and B. In group A were patients who met the criteria of uncomplicated AA, and in group B – patients who met the criteria of complicated AA. Both groups received ampicillin and metronidazole. For statistical analysis IBM SPSS Statistics 22 program was used.ResultsFrom 98 patients majority were boys (51% (n=50)) with mean age 12.6 years. As a result of antibacterial therapy clinical condition improved in 93% (n=89) of patients who were discharged without surgery. 7 patients did not improve and underwent surgery within 48 hours after admission, another 2 had elective appendectomy. There was a significant positive moderate correlation between C–reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), basophil granulocytes (BASO) and appendix diameter at admisson and after 48 hours of dual antibacterial therapy (r=0.31, p=0.003 vs. r=0.37, p<0.001 vs. r=0.41, p=0.017 vs. r=0.51, p=0.013). In group A (68% (n=67)) there was a significant positive moderate correlation between CRP, WBC and appendix diameter at admission and after 48 hours of dual antibacterial therapy (r=0.31, p=0.003 vs. r=0.37, p<0.001 vs. r=0.51, p=0.013). In group B (30% (n=31)) 7 patients underwent appendectomy and 2 patients received a broad spectrum antibacterial therapy prior to elective appendectomy. There is evidence of significant association between ALVARADO score (p=0.004), rebound tenderness (p<0.001), WBC (p=0.004), CRP (p<0.001) and stage in which appendicitis has progressed to.ConclusionsAntibiotic-alone treatment may be a safe and effective initial management choice in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, to fully evaluate effectiveness of antibacterial therapy and diagnostic criteria, further follow–up research is needed.A normal C–reactive protein value does not rule out uncomplicated acute appendicitis, therefore it can not act as a single marker to diagnose AA or to differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated AA.Recommendations of treatment of UCAA are acceptable for use in emergency department as they act as a unified tool that allows pediatricians and pediatric surgeons to quickly assess suspected acute appendicitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Sabbagh ◽  
Loréna Masseline ◽  
Gérard Grelpois ◽  
Alexandre Ntouba ◽  
Jeanne Dembinski ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (754) ◽  
pp. 787-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Skaane ◽  
P. F. Amland ◽  
T. Nordshus ◽  
K. Solheim

Author(s):  
Galib Mirza Nasirul Islam ◽  
Taruna Yadav ◽  
Pushpinder Singh Khera ◽  
Binit Sureka ◽  
Pawan Kumar Garg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-Rong Liu ◽  
Ma Xiao ◽  
Saif Ullah ◽  
Ji-Tao Song ◽  
Ling-Jian Kong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aim: Appendicography had been used in the diagnosis of chronic appendicitis. To our knowledge, the role of endoscopic retrograde appendicography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endoscopic retrograde appendicography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Patients and Method: Patients with suspected acute appendicitis between December 2013 and November 2015 at Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University underwent endoscopic retrograde appendicography. The findings and complication were analyzed retrospectively.Results: Thirty-three patients (20 men and 13 women, average age 44 ± 18 years) with suspected acute appendicitis were studied. Acute appendicitis was ruled out by normal endoscopic retrograde appendicography in 24% and confirmed in 69.6% (23). In 2 patients (8%) appendiceal orifice cannulation failed. Colonoscopic findings in acute appendicitis were mucosal hyperemia and edema of appendiceal orifice (83%), outpouring of pus from the appendiceal orifice (74%), and swollen cecal mucosa (61%). Appendicograpic findings were either normal or in acute disease showed diffuse lumenal dilation (diameter: 0.8 ± 0.4 mm), partial stenosis (43%), stiffness or inflexibility (87%) and filling defects (22%). There were no complications during or after follow-up for a median of 13 months (IQR: 9-24 months).Conclusions: Endoscopic retrograde appendicography appears to be a reliable and safe method to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and prevent unnecessary appendectomy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1471
Author(s):  
Tony Mathew ◽  
Amit Shivshankar Ammanagi

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical condition of the abdomen. Delay in treatment of acute appendicitis causes lot of complication. Study was done with the objective to study the clinical and pathological presentations of acute appendicitis, to evaluate the role of ultrasound in early diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to reduce negative appendicectomy in patients.Methods: This is a prospective study done on 100 patients with acute right lower abdominal pain clinically presumed to be of appendicular origin. A thorough history, clinical examination and ultrasound scan, was done for all cases. All ultrasound positive cases were subjected to surgery and some negative cases were also taken for surgery based on clinical suspicion. The ultrasound diagnosis was compared with clinical findings, operative findings and histopathological examination reports.Results: The overall accuracy of clinical diagnosis (Alvarado scoring system) with histopathology findings was 72%. The overall sensitivity and specificity was 70.3% and 81.3% respectively and positive predictive value of was 95.2% whereas the negative predictive value was 34.2%. The overall accuracy of ultrasound with histopathology report was 93%, with a sensitivity of 96.4%, specificity of 75%, and a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 80%. Negative appendicectomy rate was 8.82% in females and 3.63% in males.Conclusions: The Alvarado scoring system combined with ultrasound can therefore be used as a cheap and inexpensive way of confirming acute appendicitis thus reducing negative appendicectomy rate.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Maluccio ◽  
Anne M. Covey ◽  
Michael J. Weyant ◽  
Soumitra R. Eachempati ◽  
Lynn J. Hydo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document