scholarly journals Cardiovascular disease risk assessment in diabetes and metabolic syndrome patients with and without non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alim ◽  
Rakesh K. Sahay ◽  
Nuwairah Hafiz ◽  
B. Prabhakar ◽  
Mohammed Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Fatty Liver ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Risk ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

<p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Background:</span></strong><span lang="EN-US"> Recently non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been suggested as independent cardiovascular (CVD) risk factor and many studies have shown strong links between NAFLD and CVD but NAFLD has not been related to cardiovascular mortality independently on a long term follow up. Inflammation and oxidative stress is well recognized factors for NALFD which lead to many interrelated factors contributing to cardiovascular risk. Aim: To study the cardiovascular disease risk in diabetes and metabolic syndrome patients with and without NAFLD using different risk assessment calculators.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Methods: </span></strong>This was a single center, prospective cross sectional study. 62 patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome attending the endocrinology &amp; gastroenterology clinics of Osmania General Hospital were enrolled in to the study with 31 patients in group A (NAFLD) and 31 patients in group B (Non-NAFLD). Patients were diagnosed with fatty liver by ultrasound examination.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Results: </span></strong>The groups were individually evaluated for cardiovascular risk assessment by PROCAM risk score, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score and atherosclerosis Index. The means ± standard(%) deviation of Procam risk score for NAFLD group was 6.00 ± 1.00 and for Non NAFLD group it was 10.00 ± 2.00 (p=0.039). ASCVD risk score shows 5.11 ± 1.12 for NAFLD and Non NAFLD group showed 8.25 ± 2.18 (p=0.235). The Atherosclerosis index for NAFLD group was 0.24 ± 0.03 and Non NAFLD 0.18 ± 0.04 (p=0.785). The QRsik2 score for NAFLD and Non-NAFLD patients was 13.16 ± 7.56 and 17.45 ± 10.36.</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Conclusions: </span></strong>There was no difference in CVD risk assessment when assessed with different calculators in this population.</p>

scholarly journals Nutrients in Fish and Possible Associations with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Metabolic Syndrome

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Tørris ◽  
Milada Cvancarova Småstuen ◽  
Marianne Molin
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Fish Consumption ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Risk ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
The Impact

Non-communicable diseases (NSDs) are responsible for two-thirds of all deaths globally, whereas cardiovascular disease (CVD) alone counts for nearly half of them. To reduce the impact of CVD, targeting modifiable risk factors comprised in metabolic syndrome (e.g., waist circumference, lipid profile, blood pressure, and blood glucose) is of great importance. Beneficial effects of fish consumption on CVD has been revealed over the past decades, and some studies suggest that fish consumption may have a protective role in preventing metabolic syndrome. Fish contains a variety of nutrients that may contribute to health benefits. This review examines current recommendations for fish intake as a source of various nutrients (proteins, n-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, iodine, selenium, and taurine), and their effects on metabolic syndrome and the CVD risk factors. Fatty fish is recommended due to its high levels of n-3 fatty acids, however lean fish also contains nutrients that may be beneficial in the prevention of CVD.

scholarly journals Assessment of medium-term cardiovascular disease risk after Japan’s 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident: a retrospective analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e018502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Toda ◽  
Shuhei Nomura ◽  
Stuart Gilmour ◽  
Masaharu Tsubokura ◽  
Tomoyoshi Oikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Risk ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Nuclear Accident ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

ObjectiveTo assess the medium-term indirect impact of the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks and to identify whether risk factors for CVD changed after the accident.ParticipantsResidents aged 40 years and over participating in annual public health check-ups from 2009 to 2012, administered by Minamisoma city, located about 10 to 40 km from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.MethodsThe sex-specific Framingham CVD risk score was considered as the outcome measure and was compared before (2009–2010) and after the accident (2011–2012). A multivariate regression analysis was employed to evaluate risk factors for CVD.ResultsData from 563 individuals (60.2% women) aged 40 to 74 years who participated in the check-ups throughout the study period was analysed. After adjusting for covariates, no statistically significant change was identified in the CVD risk score postaccident in both sexes, which may suggest no obvious medium-term health impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on CVD risk. The risk factors for CVD and their magnitude and direction (positive/negative) did not change after the accident.ConclusionsThere was no obvious increase in CVD risks in Minamisoma city, which may indicate successful management of health risks associated with CVD in the study sample.

scholarly journals Cardiovascular risk assessment: Audit findings from a nurse clinic – a quality improvement initiative

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Sarah Waldron ◽  
Margaret Horsburgh
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Risk ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Prescribing Trends

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT: Evidence has shown the effectiveness of risk factor management in reducing mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease (CVD). An audit of a nurse CVD risk assessment programme undertaken between November 2005 and December 2008 in a Northland general practice. METHOD : A retrospective audit of CVD risk assessment with data for the first entry of 621 patients collected exclusively from PREDICT-CVDTM, along with subsequent data collected from 320 of these patients who had a subsequent assessment recorded at an interval ranging from six months to three years (18 month average). RESULTS: Of the eligible population (71%) with an initial CVD risk assessment, 430 (69.2%) had a five year absolute risk less than 15%, with 84 (13.5%) having a risk greater than 15% and having not had a cardiovascular event. Of the patients with a follow-up CVD risk assessment, 34 showed improvement. Medication prescribing for patients with absolute CVD risk greater than 15% increased from 71% to 86% for anti-platelet medication and for lipid lowering medication from 65% to 72% in the audit period. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT: The recently available ‘heart health’ trajectory tool will help patients become more aware of risks that are modifiable, together with community support to engage more patients in the nurse CVD prevention programme. Further medication audits to monitor prescribing trends. LESSONS: Patients who showed an improvement in CVD risk had an improvement in one or more modifiable risk factors and became actively involved in making changes to their health. KEYWORDS: Cardiovascular disease risk assessment; nurse clinics; audit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document