scholarly journals Merits of harmonic scalpel over conventional hemostasis in open thyroid surgery: a randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Anushree Bajaj ◽  
Bhalchandra Paike ◽  
Shahnaz Sheikh ◽  
Vikrant Vaze
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Thyroid Volume ◽  
Drainage Fluid ◽  
Drainage Volume ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The pioneers of thyroid surgery, Theodor Kocher and Theodor Billroth, developed an acceptable technique of standardized thyroid surgery between 1873 and 1883. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of harmonic scalpel use compared with conventional haemostasis in open thyroid surgery.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A total of 60 consecutive patients underwent open total thyroidectomy were randomized into two groups. Group A with harmonic scalpel and Group B with electrocautery with 30 patients each. Factors including age, sex, pathology, thyroid volume, haemostatic technique, operative time, drainage volume, thyroid weight, postoperative pain, postoperative complications and hospital stay. The results were analysed using the students t-test and x<sup>2</sup>.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> No significant difference was found between the two groups concerning mean thyroid weight and mean hospital stay. The mean operative time was shorter in the harmonic scalpel group. The total fluid drainage fluid volume was lower in Harmonic scalpel group shorter in. Harmonic scalpel group experienced significantly less post-operative pain at 24 and 48 hours.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In patients undergoing thyroidectomy, harmonic scalpel is a reliable and safe tool. AS compared with conventional haemostasis techniques, its use reduces operative times, post-operative pain, drainage volume and transient hypocalcemia.</p>

scholarly journals Focus Harmonic Scalpel Compared to Conventional Haemostasis in Open Total Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Ferri ◽  
Enrico Armato ◽  
Giacomo Spinato ◽  
Roberto Spinato
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Thyroid Volume ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Drainage Volume ◽  
Significant Difference

The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to compare operative factors, postoperative outcomes and surgical complications of open total thyroidectomy when using the Harmonic Scalpel (HS) versus Conventional Haemostasis (CH).Methods. 100 consecutive patients underwent open total thyroidectomy were randomized into two groups: group CH (Conventional Haemostasis) and group HS (Harmonic Scalpel). We recorded the following: age, sex, pathology, thyroid volume, haemostatic technique, operative time, drainage volume, thyroid weight, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. The results were analyzed using the Student’sttest and test.Results. No significant difference was found between the two groups concerning mean thyroid weight and mean hospital stay. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the HS group. The total drainage fluid volume was lower in HS group. Two (4%) transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies were observed in CH group and no one (0%) in the HS group. Postoperative transient hypocalcemia occurred more frequently in the CH group. HS group experienced significantly less postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours.Conclusions. In patients undergoing thyroidectomy, HS is a reliable and safe tool. Comparing with CH techniques, its use reduces operative times, postoperative pain, drainage volume and transient hypocalcemia.

scholarly journals Harmonic scalpel thyroidectomy versus conventional haemostasis thyroidectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Ajaz U. Haq ◽  
Tariq Mahmood ◽  
Sheetal Kumari ◽  
Aneesa Afzal
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Jammu And Kashmir ◽  
Drainage Volume ◽  
Informed Consent Form ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Operative Drainage

Background: As there is paucity of data on harmonic scalpel thyroidectomy from Jammu and Kashmir belt. So, we conducted this study to bridge this gap and also to create awareness about the use of harmonic scalpel. Thyroidectomy has become one of the most common and frequent surgery. Hemostasis in thyroid surgery is of utmost importance for a successful surgery. Our aim was to compare operative factors, postoperative outcomes of thyroidectomy using the Harmonic Scalpel (HS) and Conventional Haemostasis (CH).Methods: In this randomized control trial study, 100 patients who underwent thyroidectomy were enrolled and randomly divided in two groups- HS group and CH group. The inclusion criteria were age>18years, acceptance to participate in the study (signed informed consent form) and scheduled total thyroidectomy. The groups were compared with regards to age, gender, operative time, post-operative drainage volume, postoperative pain, and hospital stay.Results: The mean age in years was 39.8 years for HS group and 43.8 years for CH group with female preponderance. There was a significant difference with regards to operative time, post-operative drainage volume, postoperative pain, and hospital stay (p<0.001). Harmonic Scalpel shortens the operative time. And there was less post-operative drainage volume and postoperative pain in HS group. Hospital stay was also less as compared to CH group.Conclusions: HS is superior then CH thyroidectomy and is considered as a safe and better tool in thyroidectomy.

scholarly journals Differences in Surgical Outcome in Near Total Thyroidectomy for Benign Nodular Goiter: A Comparison of LigaSure Vessel Sealer versus Conventional Clamp Knot Tie Technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Shiraz Shaikh ◽  
Champa Sushel ◽  
Ahsan Ali Laghari ◽  
Qamber Ali Laghari ◽  
Zameer Hussain Laghari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Calcium Level ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Nodular Goiter ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Objective: To compare the efficacy of LigaSure Vessel Sealer in Near Total Thyroidectomy versus Conventional Clamp Knot Tie Technique in terms of bleeding, operative time and postoperative drainage. Methodology: This comparative cross sectional study was conducted at Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. Study duration was one year from November 2019 to October 2020. All patients of any age with benign multinodular goiter and either of gender were included. The study subjects were grouped into two categories by randomization (odd / even). The odd numbers were given to patients operated for ligasure and even numbers were given to patients operated with conventional clamp knot tie technique.  Outcomes were observed with respect to post-operative calcium level, intra-operative bleeding, operative time, post-operative pain & post-operative hospital stay. All the data was recorded via study proforma. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 20. Results: Total 55 patients were observed. Mean age was 33.25±10.60 years in clamp knot tie procedure group and 35.16±07.96 years in ligasure technique group; without significant difference (p-0.448). Pre and post-operative calcium levels were statistically insignificant among both groups (p-0.358 and 0.163), while loss of blood, hospital stay, post-operative pain and operative duration were significantly greater in clamp knot tie technique group in comparison to ligasure technique group (p-<0.001). Conclusion: LigaSure Vessel Sealer is a feasible and reliable surgical technique and significantly more effective as compared to conventional clamp knot tie technique in terms of post-operative bleeding, operative time, post-operative pain and post-operative hospital stay. However, calcium level was statistically insignificant.

scholarly journals Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients with Grade III and IV Disease: Harmonic Scalpel compared with Conventional technique.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (05) ◽  
pp. 929-934
Author(s):  
Safia Zahir Ahmed ◽  
Noor ul Mobeen ◽  
Bilal Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Equal Distribution ◽  
Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare conventional hemorrhoidectomy with harmonic scalped hemorhoidectomy for Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy is traditional closed procedure for 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids that is being practiced since centuries. With new innovations and technology, harmonic scalpel is an ultrasonic device which has shown to have promising results. With these two techniques a comparison study variables of pain outcome as a patient perceives, time taken for operation and length of stay in hospital. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Services hospital Lahore. Period: From August 2015 to February, 2016. Material & Methods: Patients were divided into two equal groups: Group A: conventional hemorrhoidectomy and Group B: Harmonic Scalpel. The study was performed by a single surgical operating team. Patient’s selection criteria were male and female between 20 to 80 ages with III and IV degree hemorrhoids. The outcomes were operative time, post-operative pain and duration of stay in the hospital. Results: One hundred patients with mean age 40.86+10.26 were included and randomly assigned. This came out significant difference in operative time 28.4+11.004, postoperative pain 3.73+1.96, and length of hospital stay 2.43+1.795. There were equal distribution in age and gender in both groups. Conclusions: It is concluded that harmonic scalpel technique in hemorrhoidectomy is better than conventional closed hemorrhoidectomy in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids.

Comparative effects of suture and non-suture surgical techniques on platysma after Thyroid surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1661-1664
Author(s):  
Hafiz Ali Wasay ◽  
Muhammad Aamir Jameel ◽  
Muhammad Imran Anwar ◽  
HaroonJavaid Majid ◽  
Sameen Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Platysma Muscle ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Thyroidectomy is a routine general surgical procedure and pain after thyroidectomy is responsible for prolongation of hospital stay and increased risk of respiratory complications. Platysma is routinely sutured at the end of thyroidectomy before wound closure. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the outcome of suturing platysma muscle versus not suturing in thyroid surgery patients. Aim: To compare the outcome of suturing platysma muscle versus not suturing in thyroid surgery patients. Place and duration of study: Dept. of Surgery at Sh. Zayed Hospital, Lahore from 26-12-2019 to 25-06-2020. Methodology: It is a randomized controlled trial study which consists of 92 patients, between 18 to 70 years of age in both gender and planned for thyroidectomy for nodular thyroid enlargement. Patients were randomly allocated into two treatment groups. After excision of thyroid, platysma was sutured as per conventional practice in one group while in the other group platysma was not sutured. For pain assessment Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to 24 hours after surgery. Results: The mean age was 36.4±13.4 years. The mean VAS score for post-operative pain measured 24 hours after the surgery was significantly lower in patients undergoing thyroidectomy without platysmal suture as compared to those with conventional suturing of platysma during thyroidectomy (2.37±0.97 vs. 3.67±1.28; p <0.001). Similar significant difference was also noted between groups and subgroups which based on patient’s age, gender, BMI and educational status. Conclusion: Avoiding the suturing of platysma significantly reduced the post-operative pain which advocates a change in current practice and encourages non-suturing of platysma to decrease the morbidity of patients in post-operative period. Keywords: Thyroidectomy, Platysma, Suture, No Suture, Pain

scholarly journals A comparative study between harmonic scalpel hemostasis and conventional hemostasis in total thyroidectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 954
Author(s):  
Waleed Yusif El Sherpiny
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Endocrine Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Conventional Thyroidectomy

Background: Thyroidectomy is the most commonly performed procedure in endocrine surgery. Since the thyroid gland is highly vascular, therefore, rapid and absolute hemostasis is extremely required. Conventional thyroidectomy is commonly used with acceptable outcomes, however, it is time‑consuming and resulted in significant intraoperative blood loss with the possible risk of postoperative hemorrhage, injury to parathyroid glands and laryngeal nerves. The advent of focus harmonic devices was encouraging for improving safety, effectiveness, and reduction of operative time, especially in thyroid surgery. Aim of this study: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and surgical outcomes of using ultrasonic harmonic scalpel for thyroid surgery compared to conventional techniques.Methods: This was a prospective, randomized study in which 60 patients with various types of goiters presented for thyroidectomy. The patients were divided into two comparable groups. Group A (30 patients) included patients who had focus harmonic thyroidectomy and Group B (30 patients) included patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy.Results: Focus harmonic thyroidectomy showed a significant reduction in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of postoperative fluid drainage and meantime for hospital stay compared with conventional thyroidectomy. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative hypocalcemia, seroma, hematoma, wound infection and laryngeal nerve injury between both groups.Conclusions: Focus harmonic thyroidectomy was a safe, effective, faster, and appealing alternative to conventional technique since it reduced the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage and hospital stay with comparable postoperative complications. 

scholarly journals Guillotine versus dissection tonsillectomy: randomised, controlled trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 1142-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Frampton ◽  
M J A Ward ◽  
V S Sunkaraneni ◽  
H Ismail-Koch ◽  
Z A Sheppard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Haemorrhage ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Cold Steel Dissection

AbstractObjective:This trial aimed to compare the guillotine technique of tonsillectomy with ‘cold steel’ dissection, the current ‘gold standard’.Design:A single centre, randomised, controlled trial.Methods:One hundred children aged 3 to 11 years who were listed for bilateral tonsillectomy were recruited. Patients had one tonsil removed by each technique, and were blinded to the side. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, haemostasis requirement and post-operative pain scores were recorded and compared.Results:Operative time and intra-operative blood loss were both significantly less for the guillotine technique (p < 0.001) and there was a significantly reduced haemostasis requirement (p < 0.001). Pain was also less on the guillotine side (p < 0.001). There were no tonsillar remnants or palatal trauma for either technique. There was no significant difference between techniques in the frequency of secondary haemorrhage.Conclusion:This study provides level Ib evidence that guillotine tonsillectomy in children with mobile tonsils is an effective and time-efficient procedure which produces less intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain than cold steel dissection.

scholarly journals Comparison of Harmonic Scalpel versus conventional hemostasis in Thyroid surgery in terms of per-operative and postoperative outcome.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 68-73
Author(s):  
Mumtaz Ali ◽  
Mudassar Murtaza ◽  
Mohammad Aleem-ud-Din ◽  
Mohammad Burhan Ud Din ◽  
Assam Sarwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Laryngeal Nerve ◽  
P Value ◽  
Drainage Volume ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Harmonic scalpel is popular for use in a variety of surgical procedures including thyroid surgery. Proposed advantages of the harmonic scalpel include less lateral thermal tissue damage with no electrical energy transferred to the patient, no neuromuscular stimulation, less smoke formation as compared with electrocautery. Objectives: Our aim was to compare outcomes following thyroid surgery in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, drainage volume, recurrent laryngeal nerve and parathyroid gland injury with the use of the Harmonic Scalpel compared to conventional methods of hemostasis. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Surgical Department Lahore General Hospital. Period: Twelve Months June 2016 to June 2017. Material & Methods: 60 patients, 30 in each group. Patients were randomized in each group by balloting method. Operative time, postoperative pain and drainage volume was assessed during hospital stay. Recurrent laryngeal nerve and parathyroid gland injury was assessed during hospital stay and follow-up. Results: There was no significant difference in development of hoarseness of voice in both groups, p-value > 0.05. The mean operative time for group A was 69.47 ± 15.44 minutes and for group B it was 54.93 ± 11.56 minutes, p-value <0.05. The overall blood loss in group-A and group-B was 118.73 ± 50.72 ml and 44.60±10.70 ml, p-value<0.05. The mean post-op pain observed at 2nd day for group B was 2.93 ±3.57 and for group A it was 3.57±0.77, p-value < 0.05. Conclusion: Use of Harmonic Scalpel has better results in thyroid surgery in terms of less operative time, less postoperative pain, less drainage volume, while no RLN & parathyroid injury detected in either group.

scholarly journals A comparative prospective study of laparoscopic guided needle assisted hernial sac ligation versus open herniotomy surgery in congenital inguinal hernia management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Prasad ◽  
Yogesh Satani ◽  
Girish Pannalal Bochiya
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Hernia Sac ◽  
Local Complication ◽  
Hernial Sac ◽  
Congenital Hernia ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comparative Prospective Study

Background: To evaluate if significant difference exists in surgical outcome following laparoscopic guided needle assisted congenital hernial sac ligation versus conventional open Herniotomy as later is treatment of congenital hernia and laparoscopy guided emerged as newer alternative. Objective was to know whether a significant difference exists in surgical outcomes following laparoscopic guided needle assisted congenital hernial sac ligation and conventional herniotomy in terms of mean operative time, post operative pain, recurrence, local complication, cosmetic results.Methods: Patients were randomized on basis of odd and even registrations for surgery in our institute. Patients who undergone laparoscopic guided needle assisted congenital hernial sac ligation or who undergone conventional open herniotomy for congenital hernia between November 2018 to April 2020 (50 in each arm) were followed for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months to evaluate the outcomes.Results: In our study, major complication in open herniotomy group was surgical site infection (22%), hematoma (10%), intra operative bleeding (16%), seroma formation (8%) with minimum operative duration was ~60 minutes, hospital stay of 2-3 days while no such complication reported in laparoscopic guided needle assisted hernia sac ligation group being operative time of ~20 minutes, hospital stay of 1 day with better cosmetic results.Conclusions: We conclude that laparoscopic guided needle assisted hernial sac ligation is simple, safe, efficacious with its own advantage in comparison to conventional open herniotomy and should be acceptable alternative to traditional open herniotomy approach for congenital hernia.

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document