scholarly journals MDM2 promoter polymorphism (rs2279744) and serum estrogen level are associated with increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: A case-control study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-532
Author(s):  
Sagar Dholariya ◽  
Sohil Takodara ◽  
Rashid Mir ◽  
Alpana Saxena
1989 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Hartge ◽  
Mark H. Schiffman ◽  
Robert Hoover ◽  
Larry McGowan ◽  
Linda Lesher ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda S. Cook ◽  
Andy C.Y. Leung ◽  
Kenneth Swenerton ◽  
Richard P. Gallagher ◽  
Anthony Magliocco ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Paula Ruiz ◽  
Pedro Beltran Morales-Ramirez ◽  
Olivia Lisa Dziadek ◽  
Stacey Denise Algren

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 4987-4991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiko Otokozawa ◽  
Ryoichi Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Akasaka ◽  
Eiki Ito ◽  
Sumiyo Asakura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Xingyu Chen ◽  
Jiayi Sheng ◽  
Xinyi Sun ◽  
George Qiaoqi Chen ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe association of complications of pregnancy and the risk of developing gynecological cancer is controversial with the limited study. In this study, we investigated the association of preeclampsia, or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), or large for gestational age (LGA), or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and the risk of endometrial or ovarian cancer.MethodsIn this case-control study, 189 women with endometrial cancer and 119 women with ovarian cancer were included. 342 women without gynecological cancers were randomly selected as a control group. Data on the history of pregnancy and age at diagnosis of gynecological cancer as well as the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) were collected.ResultsWomen with a history of preeclampsia or IUGR did not have an increased risk of developing endometrial or ovarian cancer. While women with a history of GDM or with the delivery of LGA infant increased the risk of developing endometrial cancer but not ovarian cancer. The odds of women with a history of GDM or with the delivery of LGA infant developing endometrial cancer was 2.691 (95% CI: 1.548, 4.3635, p=0.0003), or 6.383 (95% CI: 2.812, 13.68, p<0.0001) respectively, compared to the controls. The odds ratio of women who did not use IUDs developing ovarian cancer was 1.606 (95% CI: 1.057, 2.434), compared to the controls. There was no association of age at first birth and developing endometrial or ovarian cancer.ConclusionOur observational data suggested that GDM and delivery of an LGA infant are associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6067-6067
Author(s):  
Julia Caroline Radosa ◽  
Marc P Radosa ◽  
Pauline Mertke ◽  
Marie-Luise Hugo ◽  
Christoph Georg Radosa ◽  
...  

6067 Background: The objective of this study was to compare laparoscopy and laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of early ovarian cancer in terms of efficacy and oncologic safety. Methods: Patients who had laparoscopic staging for early stage (I/II) ovarian cancer between 01/2000 and 10/2018 at the participating sites (Gynecologic comprehensive cancer centers with respective expertise in minimal invasive surgery) were included in this retrospective case-control study. The control group consisted of all patients treated via laparotomy during the study period. Clinical data were abstracted from medical record and recent follow up information were obtained. Comparisons were made between patients regarding surgical parameters and oncologic outcome and multivariate models were used to identify factors independently associated with disease recurrence. Results: Among 313 patients, staging was performed via laparoscopy in 208 (66 %) patients and via laparotomy in 105 (34 %) patients. Patients staged laparoscopically were younger (median 52 (15-86) vs. 59 (17-92) vears, p≤0.01) and had a lower BMI (24.4 (16.5-46.8) vs. 26 (15.5-53.8), p≤0.01). Regarding surgical parameters, duration of surgery was longer (291 (159-778) vs. 277 (159-690) minutes, p≤0.01), postoperative hospitalization was shorter (7 (0-27) vs. 9 (0-92) days, p≤0.01) and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group. On univariate analysis there were no differences in rates of tumor stage according to FIGO, intraoperative rupture of ovarian cysts (14 % vs. 13 %, p=0.87), number of lymph nodes removed (24 (0-89) vs. 22 (0-96), p=0.81) or any recurrence of disease (14 % vs. 16 %, p=0.52). At a median follow-up of 46 months (0-227), there were no differences in DFS and OS by surgical technique (5yr DFS 82 % (SE 0.04) vs. 83 % (SE 0.05), p=0.43; OS 91 % (SE 0.03) vs. 87 % (SE 0.04), p=0.87). On multivariate analysis route of surgery was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Conclusions: According to this preliminary analysis, laparoscopic surgical staging in patients with early ovarian cancer seems to be adequate and safe, but a longer follow-up and prospective data are needed to enhance evidence on oncologic outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document