scholarly journals A Natural Female Disadvantage? Maternal Mortality and the Role of Nutrition Related Causes of Death in the Netherlands, 1875-1899

Author(s):  
Angelique Janssens ◽  
Elien Van Dongen
Author(s):  
Athanasios Kallianidis ◽  
Joke Schutte ◽  
Louise Schuringa ◽  
Ingrid Beenakkers ◽  
Kitty Bloemenkamp ◽  
...  

Objective: To calculate maternal mortality ratio (MMR) for 2006-2018 in the Netherlands and compare with 1993-2005. Describe women’s and obstetric characteristics, causes of death and improvable factors. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Nationwide. Population: 2,304,271 livebirths. Methods: Analysis of all maternal deaths between January 1st, 2006, and December, 31st, 2018 as reported to and audited by the national Audit Committee Maternal Mortality and Morbidity. Main outcome measures: MMR, causes of death, improvable factors. Results: Overall MMR was 6.2 per 100,000 livebirths, a decrease from 12.1 in 1993-2005 (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.5, 95%CI 0.4-0.6). Women with non-Western ethnic background had a slightly increased MMR compared to Dutch women (MMR 6.5 vs 5.0, OR 1.3, 95%CI 0.9-1.9), and was particularly increased among women with a background from Surinam/Dutch Antilles (MMR 14.7 OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.6 – 5.3). Half of all women had an uncomplicated medical history (79/161, 49.1%). Of 172 pregnancy-related deaths within one year postpartum, 103 (60%) had a direct and 69 (40%) an indirect cause. Leading causes within 42 days postpartum were cardiac disease (n=21, 14.8%), hypertensive disorders (n=20, 14.1%) and thrombosis (n=19, 13.4%). For deaths up to one year postpartum, suicide was the third commonest cause (n=20, 11.6%). Improvable factors in care were identified in 76 (47.5%) of all deaths. Conclusions: Maternal mortality halved in 2006-2018 compared to 1993-2005. Unlike before, cardiac disease outnumbered hypertensive disorders as main cause of death. Women with a background from Surinam/Dutch Antilles had a threefold higher risk of death compared to Dutch women.


Author(s):  
Linda MEIJER-WASSENAAR ◽  
Diny VAN EST

How can a supreme audit institution (SAI) use design thinking in auditing? SAIs audit the way taxpayers’ money is collected and spent. Adding design thinking to their activities is not to be taken lightly. SAIs independently check whether public organizations have done the right things in the right way, but the organizations might not be willing to act upon a SAI’s recommendations. Can you imagine the role of design in audits? In this paper we share our experiences of some design approaches in the work of one SAI: the Netherlands Court of Audit (NCA). Design thinking needs to be adapted (Dorst, 2015a) before it can be used by SAIs such as the NCA in order to reflect their independent, autonomous status. To dive deeper into design thinking, Buchanan’s design framework (2015) and different ways of reasoning (Dorst, 2015b) are used to explore how design thinking can be adapted for audits.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-253
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Stefanowicz

This article undertakes to show the way that has led to the statutory decriminalization of euthanasia-related murder and assisted suicide in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. It presents the evolution of the views held by Dutch society on the euthanasia related practice, in the consequence of which death on demand has become legal after less than thirty years. Due attention is paid to the role of organs of public authority in these changes, with a particular emphasis put on the role of the Dutch Parliament – the States General. Because of scarcity of space and limited length of the article, the change in the attitudes toward euthanasia, which has taken place in the Netherlands, is presented in a synthetic way – from the first discussions on admissibility of a euthanasia-related murder carried out in the 1970s, through the practice of killing patients at their request, which was against the law at that time, but with years began more and more acceptable, up to the statutory decriminalization of euthanasia by the Dutch Parliament, made with the support of the majority of society.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vedran Stefanovic

Abstract Despite substantial improvement in reducing maternal mortality during the recent decades, we constantly face tragic fact that maternal mortality (especially preventable deaths) is still unacceptably too high, particularly in the developing countries, where 99% of all maternal deaths worldwide occur. Poverty, lack of proper statistics, gender inequality, beliefs and corruption-associated poor governmental policies are just few of the reasons why decline in maternal mortality has not been as sharp as it was wished and expected. Education has not yet been fully recognized as the way out of poverty, improvement of women’s role in the society and consequent better perinatal care and consequent lower maternal mortality. Education should be improved on all levels including girls, women and their partners, medical providers, religious and governmental authorities. Teaching the teachers should be also an essential part of global strategy to lower maternal mortality. This paper is mostly a commentary, not a systematic review nor a meta-analysis with the aim to rise attention (again) to the role of different aspects of education in lowering maternal mortality. The International Academy of Perinatal Medicine should play a crucial role in pushing the efforts on this issue as the influential instance that promotes reflection and dialog in perinatal medicine, especially in aspects such as bioethics, the appropriate use of technological advances, and the sociological and humanistic dimensions of this specific problem of huge magnitude. The five concrete steps to achieve these goals are listed and discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document