scholarly journals Poor-Glycaemic-Control Prevalence and Determinants among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Attending a Primary Health Care Setting in Central Kerala

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (49) ◽  
pp. 2892-2897
Author(s):  
Sajith Kumar Soman ◽  
Binu Areekal ◽  
Sudhiraj Thiruthara Sukumaran ◽  
Safa Puliyakkadi ◽  
Rajesh Koothupalakkal Ravi

BACKGROUND The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing quickly all over the world. In spite of effective treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes, in majority of the people, the disease is poorly controlled with existing therapies. Glycaemic control is considered as the most important step for prevention of organ damage and other complications of diabetes. A study on the prevalence and determinants of poor glycaemic control can assist in understanding the expanse of this problems and the ways to address it. We wanted to study the prevalence and determinants of poor glycaemic control among adult patients with type II diabetes mellitus attending a primary health care setting. METHODS The cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient department of NCD clinic in a Primary health centre of Kerala for a period of six months. Two hundred and fifty individuals diagnosed with Type II DM for a year were recruited as study participants. The study participants were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Adherence to medication was assessed using The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Anthropometric measurements and blood pressures were recorded. HbA1c and RBS was measured using semi quantitative technique. Any patient with an HbA1c of more than 7 was defined as having poor glycaemic control. RESULTS 64.4 % of the participants had poor glycaemic control. Poor adherence to medication, fewer visits to doctor, lack of diet modification, frequent junk food consumption, higher body mass index and lack of exercise were found to be significantly associated with poor glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS A focused approach targeting these modifiable risk factors, especially in primary care setting, has the potential to bring about better glycaemic control which can prevent and minimize the occurrence of diabetes complications. KEYWORDS Poor Glycaemic Control, Uncontrolled Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, HbA1c, Diabetes Complications

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e232553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomomi Ueda ◽  
Yuya Tsurutani ◽  
Sho Katsuragawa ◽  
Jun Saito

We report a rare case of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complicated with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism. A 36-year-old Japanese man was admitted to our hospital owing to poor glycaemic control and hypocalcaemia. The patient had myalgia resulting from hypocalcaemia, which prevented adequate exercise. He considered the onset of myalgia to be an adverse event of oral hypoglycaemic agents and reduced compliance to medication; however, his serum calcium level was never measured. Treatment for hypocalcaemia immediately improved the myalgia, facilitating regular exercise therapy and ensuring compliance with prescribed medications, as the now-resolved myalgia was no longer perceived to be an adverse effect of glucose-lowering agents; this improved glycaemic control. Although hypoparathyroidism is a rare disease, it is necessary to assess serum calcium levels in patients with T2DM, particularly in cases presenting with unidentified complaints such as myalgia.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106-108
Author(s):  
Charchit Mehta ◽  
Vidyasagar C R ◽  
Raveesha A

Objectives- To explore the association of Triglyceride Glucose index with HbA c and To evaluate their 1 potential role as predictors of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Design: observational study Setting: Conducted in the Department of General Medicine at Sri Devaraj Urs medical college, Kolar, Karnataka. Subjects: 98 diabetic subjects were studied and were evaluated for predicting glycemic control using triglyceride glucose index. Results: Among subjects with good glycaemic control (HbA1c <7%) mean Triglyceride was 136 + 21.78 mg/dl and Among subjects with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >7%) mean Triglyceride was 190.35 + 62.94 mg/dl. there was a statistically signicant difference found between Triglyceride and HbA1c. Among subjects with good glycaemic control (HbA1c <7%) mean Triglyceride glucose index was 9275.06 + 2154.22 mg/dl and Among subjects with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >7%) mean Triglyceride glucose index was 24223.63+ 15794.73mg/dl. there was a statistically signicant difference found between Triglyceride glucose index and HbA1c Conclusion: We can use Triglyceride glucose index in predicting glycaemic control in type 2 DM which is inexpensive and cost effective.


2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke Raum ◽  
Heike U. Krämer ◽  
Gernot Rüter ◽  
Dietrich Rothenbacher ◽  
Thomas Rosemann ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Romakin ◽  
Donald Wilson ◽  
Sabiha Khan ◽  
Masoud Mohaammadnezhad

Abstract Background Diabetes is a global health problem reaching pandemic proportions. In Fiji, diabetes has a prevalence rate of 15.6% in 2011which is estimated to rise to 19.3% in 2020. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of poor glycaemic control level and its determinants among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods This retrospective study was conducted in three selected health centres in Suva, Fiji with the following inclusion criteria: adult T2DM ≥ 18 years old registered during 2011 to 2016; on treatment for > 1year; had > 4 clinic visits and; had a recent HbA1c result in 2017. Logistic regression analysis was performed and p < 0.05 considered as significant. Results There were 200 female (59.2%) and 138 male (40.8%) T2DM patients in this study with a mean age of 56.5 years (SD = ± 9.9). Most of T2DM patients have poorly controlled random blood sugar (RBS), 67.1% and fasting blood sugar (FBS), 63.0%. Two-thirds (65.4%) had associated medical conditions. The proportion of poor glycaemic control (HbA1c < 7%) was 77.2%. Mean HbA1c was 8.6% (± 2.04). RBS, FBS, cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were significant (p < 0.05) determinants of poor glycaemic control. Conclusions Health care workers dealing with T2DM patients should consider the clinical determinants of poor glycaemic control for a more effective diabetes management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document