scholarly journals Relationship between LDL-C Reduction after Coronary Revascularization and Prevention of Recurrence of Cardiovascular Events

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuhiro Nishiwaki ◽  
Mitsutoshi Satoh ◽  
Daisuke Kishi ◽  
Fumihiko Yoshie ◽  
Keiko Fukuda ◽  
...  

Purpose. The purpose of our study was to optimize lipid-lowering therapy in patients undergoing coronary revascularization and to determine whether the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level in the 3 months after coronary revascularization could be used as a predictor of the time to recurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. Biochemical values of patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapy after receiving coronary revascularization at the Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Japan, were retrospectively investigated. Recurrence of a cardiovascular event (CVE) was defined by death, myocardial infarction, or angina caused by coronary revascularization more than 3 months after the first event. Results. Of 171 patients under secondary preventive care who had at least one recurrence of a CVE, 75 showed evidence of objective stenotic lesions on coronary angiography. Among these 75 patients, exclusion of those in whom coronary revascularization had not been performed at disease onset, balloon dilatation had been used, serum lipid levels had not been measured, or coronary revascularization had been applied to restenosis left 44 patients suitable for inclusion in the study group. Although the mean value of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol did not change in the 3 months after coronary revascularization, that of (LDL-C) significantly decreased. A significant positive correlation was identified between % decrease in LDL-C and number of days to CVE recurrence. The average LDL-C value (102.8±21.7 mg/dL) in the group of patients with no recurrence within 5 years was significantly lower than that (135.3±46.1 mg/dL) in the recurrence group (P = 0.0088). The % of patients achieving the LDL-C target level (non-recurrence group vs. recurrence group: 50.0% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.032) and the % decrease in LDL-C (31.0%±12.6% vs. 9.6±21.0%, P = 0.0012) were significantly greater in the non-recurrence group than in the recurrence group. Conclusion. From our present study, a decrease in LDL-C 3 months after revascularization surgery reduces the rate of CVE relapse. The % LDL-C decrease could serve as a useful predictor of CVE recurrence, in addition to LDL-C values and achievement of the LDL-C target level.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Allahyari ◽  
T Jernberg ◽  
D Lautsch ◽  
P Lundman ◽  
E Hagstrom ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease after a myocardial infarction (MI). The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend lipid lowering therapy to reach LDL-C treatment targets after an MI. Purpose To assess LDL-C target level attainment according to the ESC guidelines among patients with a recent MI in Sweden. Methods We used data from nationwide registers in Sweden and included patients aged 18–74 years admitted to a hospital with MI (1 January 2013–1 October 2016). Among patients who were alive and had LDL-C data available, we assessed LDL-C target achievement at 6–10 weeks (n=21,505) and 12–14 months (n=17,957) after the MI by category of lipid lowering therapy (no statin; low/moderate-intensity statins; high-intensity statins; any statin plus ezetimibe). The target was defined as an LDL-C of <1.8 mmol/L and a ≥50% reduction from the baseline if LDL-C was 1.8–3.5 mmol/L and the patient was not already receiving statins. Results Most patients were treated with high-intensity statin monotherapy (84.2% and 72.0%) or any statin with ezetimibe (2.1% and 10.4%) at 6–10 weeks and 12–14 months after the MI, respectively. In total, 37.7% (6–10 weeks) and 38.3% (12–14 months) had attained their LDL-C target. The proportion of patients attaining their LDL-C target at 6–10 weeks was 12% (no statin), 30% (low/moderate-intensity statins), 39% (high-intensity statins), and 49% (any statin plus ezetimibe). The corresponding numbers at 12–14 months were 16% (no statin), 29% (low/moderate-intensity statins), 39% (high-intensity statins), and 58% (any statin plus ezetimibe). A total of 11.8% at 6–10 weeks and 12.3% at 12–14 months reached an LDL-C level of <1.8 mmol/L, but did not reach their LDL-C target level due to the ≥50% reduction criteria. (Figure 1) Figure 1 Conclusions In this large population-based study using nationwide data, more than half of patients with a recent MI did not achieve the ESC guidelines LDL-C target levels, despite a large proportion with high-intensity statin therapy. In patients treated with statins and ezetimibe, four out of ten did not reach the ESC LDL-C target level. Our findings indicate that there may be a need for additional LDL-C lowering therapy if the target level is to be attained in all patients. Acknowledgement/Funding This project was supported by funding from Merck Sharp & Dohme.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Gong ◽  
Yaqiong Chen ◽  
Yusheng Jie ◽  
Mingkai Tan ◽  
Zhaofang Jiang ◽  
...  

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-known risk factor for coronary heart disease but protects against infection and sepsis. We aimed to disclose the exact association between LDL-C and severe 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Baseline data were retrospectively collected for 601 non-severe COVID-19 patients from two centers in Guangzhou and one center in Shenzhen, and patients on admission were medically observed for at least 15 days to determine the final outcome, including the non-severe group (n = 460) and the severe group (severe and critical cases) (n = 141). Among 601 cases, 76 (12.65%) received lipid-lowering therapy; the proportion of patients taking lipid-lowering drugs in the severe group was higher than that in the non-severe group (22.7 vs. 9.6%). We found a U-shaped association between LDL-C level and risk of severe COVID-19 using restricted cubic splines. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, odds ratios for severe COVID-19 for patients with LDL-C ≤1.6 mmol/L (61.9 mg/dL) and above 3.4 mmol/L (131.4 mg/dL) were 2.29 (95% confidence interval 1.12–4.68; p = 0.023) and 2.02 (1.04–3.94; p = 0.039), respectively, compared to those with LDL-C of 2.81–3.40 mmol/L (108.6–131.4 mg/dL); following multifactorial adjustment, odds ratios were 2.61 (1.07–6.37; p = 0.035) and 2.36 (1.09–5.14; p = 0.030). Similar results were yielded using 0.3 and 0.5 mmol/L categories of LDL-C and sensitivity analyses. Both low and high LDL-C levels were significantly associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19. Although our findings do not necessarily imply causality, they suggest that clinicians should pay more attention to lipid-lowering therapy in COVID-19 patients to improve clinical prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-272
Author(s):  
Normand Blais ◽  
Jean-Philippe Adam ◽  
John Nguyen ◽  
Jean C. Grégoire

The use of lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, is associated with dyslipidemia in over 80% of patients. Clinical trial protocols for the management of lorlatinib-associated dyslipidemia differ from clinical practice guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia to prevent cardiovascular disease, in that they are based on total cholesterol and triglyceride levels rather than on the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels that form the basis of current cardiovascular guideline recommendations. In order to simplify and harmonize the management of cardiovascular risk in patients with lorlatinib, an advisory committee consisting of a medical oncologist, a cardiologist, and two pharmacists with expertise in cardiology and oncology aimed to develop a simplified algorithm, adapted from the Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia recommendations. Recommendations for the evaluation and management of hypercholesterolemia and isolated hypertriglyceridemia in patients treated with lorlatinib are outlined. These recommendations are based on data collected in a large number of lipid-lowering therapy trials applicable to individuals with and without cancer. Considering the relatively long life expectancy and improving prognosis of patients with ALK translocations, this specific patient population should be treated as are patients without cancer and are likely to derive the same benefits from lipid-lowering therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document