scholarly journals Lipid Pattern of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Hemodialysis and on Conservative Management- A Comparative Study

Author(s):  
Dr Raghu Rama Reddy .A ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Khabib Barnoev ◽  
◽  
Sherali Toshpulatov ◽  
Nozima Babajanova ◽  

The article presents the results of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of antiaggregant therapy on the functional status of the kidneys in 115 patients with stage II and III chronic kidney disease on the basis of a comparative study of dipyridamole and allthrombosepin. Studies have shown that long-term administration of allthrombosepin to patients has led to improved renal function.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Khabib Barnoev ◽  

The article presents the results of a study to assess the functional reserve of the kidneys against the background of a comparative study of antiaggregant therapy dipyridamole and allthrombosepin in 50 patients with a relatively early stage of chronic kidney disease. Studies have shown that long-term administration of allthrombosepin to patients has resulted in better maintenance of kidney functional reserves. Therefore, our research has once again confirmed that diphtheridamol, which is widely used as an antiaggregant drug in chronic kidney disease, does not lag behind the domestic raw material allthrombosepin


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisha Khokhar ◽  
Yusra Habib Khan ◽  
Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi ◽  
Humaira Majeed Khan ◽  
Nasser Hadal Alotaibi ◽  
...  

Nephron ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supakanya Wongrakpanich ◽  
Paweena Susantitaphong ◽  
Suramath Isaranuwatchai ◽  
Jirat Chenbhanich ◽  
Somchai Eiam-Ong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i384-i384
Author(s):  
Nada Sellami ◽  
Hela Jebali ◽  
Ikram Mami ◽  
Soumaya Beji ◽  
Lilia Ben Fatma ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. e0224825
Author(s):  
Pedro Coelho N. Diógenes ◽  
Aline Naiara Azevedo da Silva ◽  
Fausto Pierdoná Guzen ◽  
Marco Aurelio de Moura Freire ◽  
José Rodolfo Lopes de Paiva Cavalcanti

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 921-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Noble ◽  
Kevin Brazil ◽  
Aine Burns ◽  
Sarah Hallahan ◽  
Charles Normand ◽  
...  

Background: Only a paucity of studies have addressed clinician perspectives on patient decisional conflict, in making complex decisions between dialysis and conservative management (renal supportive and palliative care). Aim: To explore clinician views on decisional conflict in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Design: Interpretive, qualitative study. Setting and participants: As part of the wider National Institute for Health Research, PAlliative Care in chronic Kidney diSease study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (nephrologists n = 12; 7 female and clinical nurse specialists n = 15; 15 female) across 10 renal centres in the United Kingdom. Interviews took place between April 2015 and October 2016 and a thematic analysis of the interview data was undertaken. Results: Three major themes with associated subthemes were identified. The first, ‘Frequent changing of mind regarding treatment options’, revealed how patients frequently altered their treatment decisions, some refusing to make a decision until deterioration occurred. The second theme, ‘Obligatory beneficence’, included clinicians helping patients to make informed decisions where outcomes were uncertain. In weighing up risks and benefits, and the impact on patients, clinicians sometimes withheld information they thought might cause concern. Finally, ‘Intricacy of the decision’ uncovered clinicians’ views on the momentous and brave decision to be made. They also acknowledged the risks associated with this complex decision in giving prognostic information which might be inaccurate. Limitations: Relies on interpretative description which uncovers constructed truths and does not include interviews with patients. Conclusion: Findings identify decisional conflict in patient decision-making and a tension between the prerequisite for shared decision-making and current clinical practice. Clinicians also face conflict when discussing treatment options due to uncertainty in equipoise between treatments and how much information should be shared. The findings are likely to resonate across countries outside the United Kingdom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document