Combination therapy with inhaled glucocorticosteroids/long-acting beta-agonists in patients with bronchial asthma: choice of the best possible in real clinical practice

Pharmateca ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11_2019 ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
A.I. Sinopalnikov Sinopalnikov ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-626
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Arkhipov ◽  
Zaurbek R. Aisanov ◽  
Sergey N. Avdeev

Asthma management approaches are improving yearly, but the problem of asthma control is still acute. Combinations of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) play a crucial role in asthma therapy, but their effectiveness in real practice can be insufficient, and asthma control level in the population remains low. Optimizing the use of these drugs, changing the usual therapy regimens, and implementing upgraded inhalers can improve adherence to treatment and inhalation technique, which affects the effectiveness of the therapy.The study aimed to describe the key characteristics of the patient population getting asthma treatment in real clinical practice and assess factors influencing asthma control, including adherence to therapy.Methods. A single-stage cross-sectional observational study in 124 primary health care centers in 22 cities of the Russian Federation included 3,214 patients > 18 years old, with a clinical diagnosis of asthma for at least 1 year, who were able to perform a spirometry test and fill out the ACQ-5 and TAI-12 questionnaires.Results. Assessment of asthma control with the ACQ-5 questionnaire showed that most patients had uncontrolled asthma (56%). Controlled and partially controlled asthma was diagnosed in 21 and 19% of patients, respectively. 4% of patients had severe uncontrolled asthma. The TAI questionnaire revealed low adherence to therapy in more than half of the patients (53.6%). The rate of patients with controlled asthma and the average annual frequency of exacerbations were significantly lower in subgroups of patients who received therapy with extrafine ICS/LABA and ICS/formoterol in single inhaler regimen, compared with controller therapy using fixed and free combinations of ICS and LABA.Conclusion. The main causes of insufficient asthma control are low adherence to treatment, inhalation errors, monotherapy with ICS, asthma with small airways dysfunction, and adverse events associated with ICS. Prescribing the combinations of ICS/LABA in the form of extra-fine aerosol and using it in the Maintenance and Reliever Therapy (MART) regimen can significantly increase asthma control, reduce the risk of adverse events, and increase patient adherence to treatment. A potential alternative to improve asthma control is administering ICS-LABA combinations once daily.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-352
Author(s):  
I. V. Leshchenko

Asthma control is still difficult to achieve. One of main tools for evaluating asthma control is a well-known Asthma Control Test (ACT). Common causes of insufficient asthma control include poor adherence to treatment and non-compliance of the patient with the dosing regimen. Correct inhalation technique significantly contributes to better adherence to treatment. Elliptа is a multi-dose powder inhaler with dose counter and indication of remaining dose number. Actuation of Ellipta inhaler requires only one movement. Inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) are the key agents in the maintenance pharmacological therapy of asthma. A novel vilanterol/fluticasone furoate (VI/FF) combination is a highly effective combination for maintenance treatment of moderate to severe asthma with 24-hour effect providing once-daily dosing. The Salford study demonstrated advantages of VI/FF combination over ICS monotherapy and other combination of ICS/LABA in real clinical practice in patients with asthma out of dependence of asthma severity or comorbidities.


Pharmateca ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10_2020 ◽  
pp. 125-132
Author(s):  
N.M. Nenasheva Nenasheva ◽  
S.V. Fedosenko Fedosenko ◽  
E.N. Barabanova Barabanova ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 514-522
Author(s):  
N. A. Demidov ◽  
M. B. Antsiferov ◽  
A. V. Zilov

BACKGRAUND: The widespread prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), high mortality and disability of such patients are the reason for the constant active search for effective approaches to hypoglycemic therapy. Recent years have been marked by a change in the strategy for treatment initiation of T2DM. In clinical studies, evidence has been obtained about the benefits of prescribing combination therapy from the time of diagnosis. It seems important to study this treatment option also in real clinical practice.AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the initiation with Galvus Met® as compared with any other combination therapy approaches used in everyday clinical practice.MATERIALS AND METHODS: multicenter prospective observational study in 15 regions of Russia lasting 6 months. Patients were included in the study after the endocrinologist made a decision on the appointment of therapy. Of the men and women over 18 years of age with first diagnosed or previously untreated type 2 diabetes and a level of glycated hemoglobin >7.5%, two groups were formed. The first group included patients who received vildagliptin + metformin (Galvus Met®) in a fixed dose of 50/1000 mg, n=729, the second — another double combination (with the exception of insulin and GLP-1), n=669. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients (%) who achieved the level of HbA1c <7.0% without proven hypoglycemia at the end of the observation. The NHPQ questionnaire was used to assess the frequency of hypoglycemia.RESULTS: 1385 patients completed the study. For the other combination therapy group, metformin and sulfonylurea derivatives were most often selected (66.5%). In the Galvus Met® group, 68.7% of patients achieved an HbA1c level of <7.0% without proven hypoglycemia, which is significantly better compared to the group of other combinations (40.7%, p <0.001). Galvus Met® therapy contributed to a significantly greater decrease in HbA1c levels by the end of the study compared to other combinations (delta HbA1c -1.6 ± 0.8% versus -1.4 ± 0.9%, p <0.001). In the same group, the average level of HbA1c reached 6.7 ± 0.6% by the end of the study versus 7.1 ± 0.8% in the comparison group, p <0.001. In the Galvus Met® group, body weight decreased by 3.2 ± 3.9 kg, and in the comparison group by 1.3 ± 4.8 kg, p <0.001. The frequency of hypoglycemia episodes in the Galvus Met® group by the end of the study was significantly lower than in the comparison group: 0.8 ± 0.7 episodes per person, versus 1.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.037. In the Galvus Met® group, there were significantly fewer adverse events (4.9% versus 17.7%, p <0.001).CONCLUSIONS: In real clinical practice, Galvus Met® starting therapy has shown better efficacy and safety in terms of achieving glycemic control, HbA1c dynamics, effects on body weight, the frequency of hypoglycemic conditions compared with other combined oral hypoglycemic therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Z. R. Aisanov ◽  
S. N. Avdeev ◽  
A. S. Belevskiy ◽  
A. A. Vizel' ◽  
A. V. Emel'yanov ◽  
...  

Achieving the control of bronchial asthma (BA) in real clinical practice remains an unresolved problem, despite the expansion of therapeutic options in this area. Guidelines about when and for whom should a particular treatment be used continue to develop. Increasing of inhaled corticosteroid dose (ICS) in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) does not always lead to the desired result, although a combined LABA-ICS inhaler could improve the course of asthma and increase adherence. The addition of tiotropium bromide to LABA-ICS requires the use of two inhalers. The targeted biological therapy is associated with the complexity of phenotyping and is possible only in specialized medical centers. Mometasone furoate, indacaterol acetate, and glycopyrronium bromide in fixed doses were combined in Breezhaler® inhaler for asthma maintenance therapy once per day. This way of treatment helps to realize full potential of maintenance inhalation therapy of bronchial asthma and to simplify the achievement of control over the disease in routine clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document