Phase III randomized trial of autologous cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in korea

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment consisting of low intensity alternating electric fields. The combination of TTFields with maintenance temozolomide significantly improved survival versus temozolomide alone in the phase 3 EF-14 study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). In preclinical studies, TTFields increased the number of glioma cells undergoing cellular death following radiotherapy (RT) by inhibiting DNA damage repair, suggesting a radio-sensitizing effect of TTFields. This pilot study is the first to evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering TTFields concomitant to RT and TMZ in ndGBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by maintenance TMZ and TTFields for up to 24 months. TTFields (200kHz) were delivered for >18 hours/day while the transducer arrays were removed during delivery of RT. TMZ was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2/daily for 6 weeks and RT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was safety of the combined TTFields/RT/TMZ; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE V4.0. RESULTS 10 ndGBM patients that recovered from maximal debulking surgery or biopsy were enrolled at a single center in Israel between April and December 2017. Five patients (50%) had undergone gross total resection while the rest had biopsy only. Eight of the patients were male, median age was 59, median KPS was 80 and median dose of RT was 60 Gy. Six patients (60%) reported at least one AE. The most common AE was TTFields-related skin toxicity, reported in four patients (40%), all of which were grade 1–2 in severity. Two patients reported serious AEs (seizures and general deterioration) that were considered unrelated to TTFields. Median PFS with RT/TMZ/TTFields was 10.5 months. Median OS has not yet been reached. CONCLUSION The proportion of patients with TTFields-related skin toxicity was similar to that reported in ndGBM patients in the randomized Phase III study (52%), where patients started TTFields at least 4 weeks after RT. No other TTFields-related toxicities were reported and there were no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities as a result of combining TTFields with RT in addition to TMZ. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy results of this pilot study, a phase II randomized study has been initiated to investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in 60 ndGBM patients.

Download Full-text

A phase II study of chemoradiation followed by adjuvant temozolomide and poly-ICLC in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: 12- and 18-month survival data (NABTT 0501)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.2002 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2002-2002

Author(s):

M. R. Rosenfeld ◽

M. Chamberlain ◽

S. A. Grossman ◽

D. M. Peereboom ◽

G. J. Lesser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Adjuvant Treatment ◽

Survival Data ◽

Cell Activation ◽

Killer Cell ◽

External Beam Radiation ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Beam Radiation ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2002 Background: Polyinosinic-polycytidylic (poly-ICLC), is a double-stranded RNA that stimulates a variety of host defense mechanisms including T-cell and natural killer cell activation, cytokine release and specific anti-proliferative and anti-viral effects. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of poly-ICLC when added to adjuvant treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients > 18 years with histologically proven glioblastoma received standard external beam radiation with concurrent low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) (75 mg/m2) followed by adjuvant cycles of TMZ for 5 days (150–200 mg/m2) (week 1) then intramuscular injections of poly-ICLC (20 mcg/kg) 3 times a week (weeks 2–8; total 21 injections) with week 9 off and no limit to the number of adjuvant cycles (TMZ + poly-ICLC). Imaging evaluations were performed before every cycle. Results: There were 97 patients enrolled (60 men); median age 56 yrs (range 21–85); median KPS 90 (range 60–100). Fourteen patients did not start adjuvant treatment (5 patient request and 4 investigator withdrawal; 2 progressive disease; 1 death; 1 toxicity; 1 other). The most frequent CTC grade 3–4 toxicities occurring in > 5% of subjects at least possibly related to poly-ICLC were leukopenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (14%), anemia (13%), neutropenia (10%), and SGPT (9%) or alkaline phosphatase (7%) elevation. Two deaths during adjuvant treatment were considered unlikely related to poly-ICLC. To date 71 of 97 patients have survived at least 12 months from diagnosis. The estimated median survival for the entire cohort was 17.2 months (95% CI: 15.5–19.3 months). Overall survival for the cohort at 12 months was 73.2% (95% CI: 63%-82%) and at 18 months 47.4% (95% CI: 37–58%). For only those subjects 18–70 years, overall survival at 18 months was 51.8% (95% CI: 41–63%). This is contrasted with EORTC 26981/22981 that reported an 18 month overall survival of 39.4% (95% CI: 33.8–45.1). Conclusions: The addition of poly-ICLC to a modified adjuvant treatment regimen for newly diagnosed GB is well-tolerated. Survival data at 12 and 18 months suggest increased efficacy compared to chemoradiation with adjuvant TMZ only. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps2072 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS2072-TPS2072 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Patrick Roth ◽

Jaap C. Reijneveld ◽

Thierry Gorlia ◽

Frederic Dhermain ◽

Filip Yves Francine Leon De Vos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Standard Treatment ◽

Karnofsky Performance Status ◽

Performance Status ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Open Label ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

TPS2072 Background: The standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma comprises maximum safe surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant and up to six cycles of maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). Despite this intense therapy, the prognosis remains poor and there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic options. Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and brain-penetrant pan-proteasome inhibitor. Following its successful assessment in phase I trials in patients with newly diagnosed as well as recurrent glioblastoma, marizomib is now being investigated in a phase III trial. Methods: EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a performance status ≥70. Approximately a total of 750 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1. Stratification factors include institution, age, Karnofsky performance status and extent of surgery. The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard of care (TMZ/RT→TMZ) with patients receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy specifies the determination of this objective in both the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup of patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. The study is accompanied by a translational research program. The study will be opened at 50 EORTC sites in Europe and done as an intergroup collaboration with the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) with 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient enrolment started in June 2018 and as of January 29, 2019, a total of 85 patients have been randomized. An update on the enrolment status will be provided at the ASCO conference. Clinical trial information: NCT03345095.

Download Full-text

Updated safety/feasibility study of concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e14535 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14535-e14535

Author(s):

Rachel Grossman ◽

Felix Bokstein ◽

Deborah T. Blumenthal ◽

Dror Limon ◽

Carmit Ben Harush ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Radiation Therapy ◽

Pilot Study ◽

Electric Fields ◽

Tumor Resection ◽

Skin Toxicity ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Karnofsky Performance Score ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Tumor Treating Fields ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

e14535 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment comprises low-intensity alternating electric fields. In the phase III EF-14 study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM), TTFields in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) significantly improved survival compared to TMZ alone. In preclinical studies TTFields had a radiosensitizing effect and increased the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT). This pilot study [NCT03780569] evaluated the feasibility and safety of TTFields administered concurrently with RT and TMZ in ndGBM patients. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ/TTFields. TTFields (200 kHz) were delivered for ≥18 hours/day with transducer arrays removed during RT delivery. RT was administered to the tumor bed in 30 fractions (total dose 60 Gy) in combination with daily TMZ (75 mg/m2). In the adjuvant phase, patients received monthly TMZ (150–200 mg/m2 for 5 days) plus TTFields. The primary outcome was safety of the combined therapies; secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE v4.0. Results: Ten patients were enrolled at a single center between April and December 2017. Median age was 60.2 years, median Karnofsky Performance Score was 90.0, and eight (80%) patients were male. Five (50%) patients had undergone tumor resection while the remainder had biopsy only. Eight patients experienced ≥1 RT treatment delay; delays were unrelated to TTFields treatment. All patients experienced ≥1 AE. Three patients suffered from serious AEs (urinary tract infection, confusional state, and decubitus ulcer) that were considered unrelated to TTFields. The most common AE was skin toxicity, reported in eight (80%) patients; all were of low severity (CTCAE grade 1–2) and were reported as related to TTFields treatment. Median PFS from enrollment was 8.9 months; median OS was not reached at the time of study closure. Conclusions: Eighty percent of patients experienced grade 1–2 TTFields-related skin toxicity. No other TTFields-related toxicities were observed and there was no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities as a result of combining TTFields with these therapies. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy results of this pilot study, a phase 2 randomized trial (N = 60; NCT03869242) and the Phase 3 TRIDENT trial have been initiated to further investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in ndGBM. Clinical trial information: NCT03780569.

Download Full-text