scholarly journals High Id1 expression, a generally negative prognostic factor, paradoxically predicts a favorable prognosis for adjuvant paclitaxel plus cisplatin therapy in surgically treated lung cancer patients

Oncotarget ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (22) ◽  
pp. 11564-11575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Jen Cheng ◽  
Yi-Chen Lee ◽  
Wen-Chin Chiu ◽  
Jen-Wei Tsai ◽  
Yu-Han Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Favorable Prognosis ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cisplatin Therapy

scholarly journals P2.16-43 Diabetes is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Resectional Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. S848
Author(s):  
I. Yasar ◽  
E. Şengül ◽  
B. Sozen ◽  
H.v. Kara ◽  
K. Kaynak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Resectional Surgery ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor

787 The Presence of Circulating Tumour Cells is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Lung Cancer Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S187-S188
Author(s):  
A. Benedikova ◽  
J. Srovnal ◽  
J. Klein ◽  
P. Skalicky ◽  
M. Szkorupa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumour Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumour Cells ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor

Clinical importance of circulating tumor cells in lung cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22109-e22109
Author(s):  
Andrea Benedikova ◽  
Josef Srovnal ◽  
Jiri Klein ◽  
Pavel Skalicky ◽  
Marek Szkorupa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor

e22109 Background: Assessment of the circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in lung cancer patients could prevent burdensome surgery in understaged cases. Therefore we have tested the hypothesis that the presence of CTCs is a negative prognostic factor in these patients and correlates with poor survival. Methods: This was a prospective study to test the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood, pulmonary blood and bone marrow in 108 lung cancer patients (75 males, 33 females; mean age 66.2 years, ranging from 29 to 82 years) at the time of surgery using real-time RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), lung-specific X protein (LUNX) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-met). Results: We found a statistically significant association between c-met expression level in the pulmonary blood and clinical stage (p<0.044) and lymph node involvement (p<0.0023). C-met marker also showed significantly higher positivity ratio in the peripheral (p<0.034) and pulmonary (p<0.04) blood in patients with histologically proven lymphatic metastases than in patients with negative lymph nodes. The positivity of CTCs in peripheral blood or bone marrow using c-met was independent of clinical stage, age, sex and grading using Cox regression analysis (p=0.006, resp. 0.001). 82 patients followed up for more than 1 year were involved into the overall survival (OS) analysis. 27 of them (32.9 %) died, the OS median was 19.8 months. The patients with the presence of CTCs in the peripheral blood or the bone marrow using c-met had significantly shorter OS and higher hazard ratio (p<0.024; HR=4.39 [95% CI: 1.58-12.22], resp. p<0.008; HR=5.08 [95% CI: 1.79-14.43]). In addition, patients with the presence of CTCs detected in bone marrow using CEA and/or c-met had significantly shorter OS (p<0.025; HR=3.08 [95% CI: 1.26-7.5]). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the presence of CTCs is independent negative prognostic factor in lung cancer patients. The analysis of CTCs is clinically feasible, reproducible and further studies focused on early clinical stages should demonstrate its applicability in individualization of adjuvant therapy in lung cancer patients and identification of individuals who would not benefit from extensive lung surgery.

scholarly journals Expression signature, prognosis value and immune characteristics of cathepsin F in non-small cell lung cancer identified by bioinformatics assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyuan Song ◽  
Xianhui Wang ◽  
Wang Cheng ◽  
Yi Wu ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Favorable Prognosis

Abstract Background In recent years, immunotherapies and targeted therapies contribute to population-level improvement in NSCLC cancer-specific survival, however, the two novel therapeutic options have mainly benefit patients containing mutated driven genes. Thus, to explore other potential genes related with immunity or targeted therapies may provide novel options to improve survival of lung cancer patients without mutated driven genes. CTSF is unique in human cysteine proteinases. Presently, CTSF has been detected in several cell lines of lung cancer, but its role in progression and prognosis of lung cancer remains unclear. Methods CTSF expression and clinical datasets of lung cancer patients were obtained from GTEx, TIMER, CCLE, THPA, and TCGA, respectively. Association of CTSF expression with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis of lung cancer patients was analyzed using UALCAN and Kaplan–Meier Plotter, respectively. LinkedOmics were used to analyze correlation between CTSF and CTSF co-expressed genes. Protein–protein interaction and gene–gene interaction were analyzed using STRING and GeneMANIA, respectively. Association of CTSF with molecular markers of immune cells and immunomodulators was analyzed with Immunedeconv and TISIDB, respectively. Results CTSF expression was currently only available for patients with NSCLC. Compared to normal tissues, CTSF was downregulated in NSCLC samples and high expressed CTSF was correlated with favorable prognosis of NSCLC. Additionally, CTSF expression was correlated with that of immune cell molecular markers and immunomodulators both in LUAD and LUSC. Noticeably, high expression of CTSF-related CTLA-4 was found to be associated with better OS of LUAD patients. Increased expression of CTSF-related LAG-3 was related with poor prognosis of LUAD patients while there was no association between CTSF-related PD-1/PD-L1 and prognosis of LUAD patients. Moreover, increased expression of CTSF-related CD27 was related with poor prognosis of LUAD patients while favorable prognosis of LUSC patients. Conclusions CTSF might play an anti-tumor effect via regulating immune response of NSCLC.

scholarly journals CD8+CD103+ Tumor–Infiltrating Lymphocytes Are Tumor-Specific Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells and a Prognostic Factor for Survival in Lung Cancer Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 194 (7) ◽  
pp. 3475-3486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fayçal Djenidi ◽  
Julien Adam ◽  
Aïcha Goubar ◽  
Aurélie Durgeau ◽  
Guillaume Meurice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Memory T Cells ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Specific Tissue ◽  
Resident Memory T Cells ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Hypermetabolism is an independent prognostic factor of survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1893-1899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Jouinot ◽  
Guillaume Ulmann ◽  
Clara Vazeille ◽  
Jean-Philippe Durand ◽  
Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients

scholarly journals KRAS Mutation in Lung Cancer Patients: A Poor Prognostic Factor but not a Predictive Factor of EGFR-TKI and Chemotherapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. xi47-xi48
Author(s):  
J.-l. Guan ◽  
W.-z. Zhong ◽  
S.-j. An ◽  
J. Su ◽  
Z.-h. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Predictive Factor ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki

The significance of SUV of 18-FDG PET for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17032-17032
Author(s):  
H. Guo ◽  
X. Hu ◽  
Z. Li
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Multiple Modality

17032 Background: To explore the possibility that the standardized uptake value(SUV) of positron emission tomography(PET) could be a prognostic factor for lung cancer and whether it holds more significance than clinical stage,the current predominant prognostic factor for NSCLC patients. To assess the possible connection between the SUV and clinical and histopathologic characteristics of lung cancer patients(especially the histology), in order to build a comprehensive picture for the potential application of SUV. Methods: Eighty-two patients taking PET examination before receiving any treatment were analysed, the majority of which(fifty) consisted of patients treated with multiple modality treatment where surgery played a central role. 1-year and 3-year survival(OS) Rate, Progress Free Survival(PFS) Rate were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with the log-rank test.The prognostic significance was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.Nonparametric tests were performed to determine whether there was valuable difference amid each SUV group classified by certain clinical or histopathologic characteristic. Results: A SUV cutoff of 5.0 for the primary tumor showed the greatest discriminative value for overall survival.As for the PFS,the cufoff is 4.0. The SUV for the primary tumor was a significant predictor for both overall survival and PFS, based on the result that the relative risk was 7.075 and 2.719 respectively. As a result of multivariate analyse,the prognostic value of SUV and Clinical Staging was independent of each other, and the value of the SUV was considerably higher than the latter. The SUV for the small-cell lung cancer group was statistically higher than the non-small-cell lung cancer group. And there was significant overall discrepancy across the groups sorted by the degree of differentiation. Conclusions: The SUV of the primary tumor has the potential to be the leading prognostic factor for patients treated by multiple modality treatment, leading to substantially improved management for lung cancer patients. And there could be close connection between SUV and histopathologic or differentiation feature of lung cancer tissue, although it is still open to discussion. Analysis for larger number of cases could settle the issue. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document