scholarly journals TRABECULAR BONE SCORE – A NON-INVASIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD TO EVALUATE BONE QUALITY BASED ON ROUTINE DUAL-ENERGY ABSORPTIOMETRY. PERSPECTIVES OF ITS USE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. T. Tsoriev ◽  
Zh. E. Belaya ◽  
G. A. Mel'nichenko
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals TRABECULAR BONE SCORE – A NON-INVASIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD TO EVALUATE BONE QUALITY BASED ON ROUTINE DUAL-ENERGY ABSORPTIOMETRY. PERSPECTIVES OF ITS USE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-476
Author(s):  
T. T. Tsoriev ◽  
Zh. E. Belaya ◽  
G. A. Mel'nichenko
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score ◽  
Bone Microarchitecture ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Secondary Osteoporosis ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Physical Measurements

Two-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, osteodensitometry) is currently considered as the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. However, despite good operational characteristics, this type of investigation cannot help to assess bone microarchitecture and the degree of its derangement in osteoporosis. Therefore, trabecular bone score (TBS) has been developed as a  non-invasive method of indirect description of bone microarchitecture based on data derived from a  standard DXA of the lumbar spine. Not being a direct mapping of the physical measurements of trabecular microarchitecture, TBS nevertheless shows a positive correlation with quantitative values obtained from micro-computed tomography and high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, i.e. with the bone volume fraction, junction density, trabecular numbers and their disintegration. There is also an association between the ability of the bone tissue to resist stress in experimental studies ex vivo and TBS measurement. Due to TBS, there is a possibility to detect bone microarchitecture impairment even in individuals with normal bone mineral density (BMD), i.e. higher TBS values correlate with improved bone microstructure, whereas a  reduced TBS shows its deterioration. Limitation of TBS use are primarily related to the DXA image quality: image faults caused either by technical reasons or by too low or too high body mass index can lead to an overestimation/underestimation of the index. Assessment of the lumbar TBS has been repeatedly performed in cross-sectional and prospective studies in representative patient samples (mainly postmenopausal women) and significant numbers of healthy subjects, and proved to be a predictor (independent of BMD) of fracture risk. An evaluation of the possibility to use TBS for early diagnosis of secondary osteoporosis (related to various endocrine disorders)  would be of great interest, as BMD, as known from clinical practice, is not always a  reliable measurement of the bone endurance, especially in diabetes, steroid osteoporosis and acromegaly.  The use of TBS along with BMD as a  marker of efficacy of current treatment for secondary osteoporosis is also possible, but it is not yet evidence-based; therefore, research has to be continued.

scholarly journals Bone quality, as measured by trabecular bone score, in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

2013 ◽  
Vol 169 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Eller-Vainicher ◽  
Marcello Filopanti ◽  
Serena Palmieri ◽  
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽  
Valentina Morelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Texture Measurement ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Spinal Radiograph ◽  
And Gender

ObjectiveIn primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), vertebral fractures (VFx) occur regardless of bone mineral density (BMD) and may depend on decreased bone quality. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a texture measurement acquired during a spinal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Recently, TBS has been proposed as an index of bone micro-architecture.DesignWe studied 92 PHPT patients (74 females, age 62.1±9.7 years) and 98 control subjects. In all patients at baseline, in 20 surgically treated patients and in 10 conservatively treated patients after 24 months, TBS, spinal (lumbar spine (LS)) and femoral (total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN)) BMD were assessed by DXA and VFx by spinal radiograph.ResultsPHPT patients had lower TBS (−2.39±1.8) and higher VFx prevalence (43.5%) than controls (−0.98±1.07 and 8.2% respectively, bothP<0.0001). TBS was associated with VFx (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.9,P=0.02), regardless of LS-BMD, age, BMI and gender, and showed a better compromise between sensitivity (75%) and specificity (61.5%) for detecting VFx than LS-BMD, TH-BMD and FN-BMD (31 and 75%, 72 and 44.2%, and 64 and 65% respectively). In surgically treated patients, TBS, LS-BMD, TH-BMD and FN-BMD increased (+47±44.8,+29.2±34.1,+49.4±48.7 and +30.2±39.3% respectively, allP<0.0001). Among patients treated conservatively, TBS decreased significantly in those (n=3) with incident VFx (−1.3±0.3) compared with those without (−0.01±0.9,P=0.048), while BMD changes were not statistically different (LS 0.3±1.2 vs −0.8±0.9 respectively,P=0.19; TH 0.4±0.8 vs −0.8±1.4 respectively,P=0.13 and FN 0.4±0.9 vs −0.8±1.4 respectively,P=0.14).ConclusionsIn PHPT, bone quality, as measured by TBS, is reduced and associated with VFx and improves after surgery.

Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Monitoring with Trabecular Bone Score: 2019 ISCD Official Position

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Krohn ◽  
Elliott N. Schwartz ◽  
Yoon-Sok Chung ◽  
E. Michael Lewiecki
Keyword(s):  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Official Position

Assessment of bone quality with trabecular bone score in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A study from the FRISBEE cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. e13347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Baleanu ◽  
Pierre Bergmann ◽  
Anne Sophie Hambye ◽  
Carole Dekelver ◽  
Laura Iconaru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score

Optimizing DXA to Assess Skeletal Health: Key Concepts for Clinicians

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 3784-3791
Author(s):  
Kurt A Kennel ◽  
Jad G Sfeir ◽  
Matthew T Drake
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Skeletal Health ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Osteoporosis Care

Abstract Context The diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk prior to a sentinel fracture was transformed by the widespread clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Evidence Acquisition This review is based on a collection of primary and review literature gathered from a PubMed search of “dual energy X-ray absorptiometry,” “trabecular bone score,” and “atypical femur fracture” among other keywords. PubMed searches were supplemented by the authors’ prior knowledge of the subject. Evidence Synthesis While uncertainty exists for some aspects of osteoporosis care, patient and clinician familiarity with BMD assessment for screening and monitoring is firmly established. Beyond BMD, lateral spine images obtained with DXA can diagnose osteoporosis and refine fracture risk through the detection of unrecognized vertebral fractures. In addition, analysis of DXA lumbar spine images can reflect changes in trabecular bone microarchitecture, a component of bone “quality” that predicts risk of fracture independent of BMD. Finally, monitoring of bone health by DXA may be extended to include assessment of the femoral cortices for rare but serious adverse effects associated with antiresorptive therapies. Conclusions Increasing technologic sophistication requires additional consideration for how DXA imaging is performed, interpreted and applied to patient care. As with any test, clinicians must be familiar with DXA performance, pitfalls in analysis, and interpretation within each clinical context in which DXA is applied. With this perspective, care providers will be well positioned to contribute to continuous improvement of DXA performance and, in turn, quality of osteoporosis care.

scholarly journals Bone quality, as measured by trabecular bone score (TBS), in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Eller-Vainicher ◽  
Marcello Filopanti ◽  
Serena Palmieri ◽  
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽  
Valentina Morelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score

scholarly journals Similarities and differences between bone quality parameters, trabecular bone score and femur geometry

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0260924
Author(s):  
Kyong Young Kim ◽  
Kyoung Min Kim
Keyword(s):  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Cortical Thickness ◽  
Trabecular Bone Score ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Femur Geometry

Bone quality is a critical factor that, along with bone quantity, determines bone strength. Image-based parameters are used for assessing bone quality non-invasively. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is used to assess quality of trabecular bone and femur geometry for cortical bone. Little is known about the associations between these two bone quality parameters and whether they show differences in the relationships with age and body mass index (BMI). We investigated the associations between the trabecular bone score (TBS) and femur cortical geometry. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the TBS was assessed using iNsight software and, femur geometry using APEX (Hologic). A total of 452 men and 517 women aged 50 years and older with no medical history of a condition affecting bone metabolism were included. Z-scores for TBS and cortical thickness were calculated using the age-specific mean and SD for each parameter. A ‘discrepancy group’ was defined as patients whose absolute Z-score difference between TBS and cortical thickness was > 1 point. TBS and cortical thickness correlated negatively with age both in men and women, but the associations were stronger in women. Regarding the associations with BMI, TBS provided significant negative correlation with BMI in the range of BMI > 25 kg/m2. By contrast, cortical thickness correlated positively with BMI for all BMI ranges. These bone quality-related parameters, TBS and cortical thickness, significantly correlated, but discordance between these two parameters was observed in about one-third of the men and women (32.7% and 33.4%, respectively). Conclusively, image-based bone quality parameters for trabecular and cortical bone exhibit both similarities and differences in terms of their associations with age and BMI. These different profiles in TBS and FN cortical thickness might results in different risk profiles for the vertebral fractures or hip fractures in a certain percentage of people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document