scholarly journals Does meniscal release confer similar clinical benefits to meniscal tear treatment when compared to meniscectomy?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Garland
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Naturally Occurring

PICO question In adult dogs with naturally occurring medial meniscal tears concurrent to cranial cruciate ligament disease does meniscal release confer the same benefits in lameness resolution as meniscectomy?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed A single prospective cross-sectional study was reviewed, that fulfilled the criteria Strength of evidence None Outcomes reported Meniscal release, meniscectomy (partial, hemi- or complete), or the two combined performed for concurrent medial meniscal pathology at time of surgery for naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture resulted in an acceptable long-term outcome. Difference in outcome between the techniques was not reported Conclusion There is no evidence that meniscal release provides an equal or superior treatment option for medial meniscal injury treated at the time of surgery for CCL rupture when compared to meniscectomy. The study critically reviewed performed meniscal release via radial transection through the meniscotibial ligament, and therefore does not represent mid-body abaxial radial release. Neither is this summary appropriate for considering prophylactic meniscal release of the normal meniscus. In addition, the surgical treatments for cranial cruciate ligament rupture were either ‘Tightrope’ or tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) procedures. Further studies are required to compare clinical outcome between meniscal release or meniscectomy for treatment of concurrent meniscal tears   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals In dogs weighing under 15 Kg with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease, does tibial tuberosity advancement lead to better long-term functional outcomes than lateral fabellar suture?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tafara Mapuvire
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease

PICO question In dogs weighing under 15 kg with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease, does tibial tuberosity advancement lead to better long-term functional outcomes than lateral fabellar suture?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed There were no papers that answered the PICO question Strength of evidence Zero Outcomes reported Between TTA and LFS none of the techniques was shown to provide better long-term functional outcomes than the other in dogs weighing less than 15 kg Conclusion Given the absence of evidence answering the PICO question, choice and recommendation of procedure between TTA and LFS in dogs weighing under 15 kg should be guided by what the surgeon deems to be in the best interest of the patient   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Do dogs with non-surgically managed cranial cruciate ligament disease have better outcomes with rehabilitation?

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Merickel ◽  
Wanda Gordon-Evans
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Successful Outcomes ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease

PICO question In dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease treated non-surgically with rehabilitation, is the outcome inferior/equivalent/superior as measured by owner and/or veterinarian evaluation to dogs treated non-surgically without rehabilitation?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Four papers were critically appraised. One paper reviewed was a prospective, randomised clinical trial. The remaining three papers were retrospective cohort studies Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported There are no studies available that directly compare dogs managed non-surgically with and without rehabilitation following cranial cruciate ligament injury. In one study, 66% of dogs treated non-surgically with rehabilitation are reported to have successful outcomes 1 year following initiation of treatment. For dogs managed non-surgically without rehabilitation, successful outcomes varied from 19%–90% of cases among several retrospective studies Conclusion There is evidence suggesting the addition of rehabilitation to conservative therapy is beneficial, but based on the current literature, it is impossible to say whether it is superior to conservative treatment without rehabilitation   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Articular Cartilage Scores of the Canine Stifle Joint with Naturally Occurring Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Agnello ◽  
Kei Hayashi ◽  
Dorothy Cimino Brown
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cartilage Damage ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Trochlear Groove ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Stifle Joint ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Medial Meniscal Tear ◽  
Severity Scores

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate frequency, location and severity of cartilage pathology in dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) disease. Study Design Stifle arthroscopic video recordings (n = 120) were reviewed. A modified Outerbridge classification system (MOCS) (0–4) was used to score cartilage at 10 locations in the femorotibial (medial and lateral femoral condyles and tibial plateaus) and patellofemoral compartments (proximal, middle and distal locations of the patella and femoral trochlear groove) of the stifle joint. Synovial pathology was scored and the presence of a medial meniscal tear was recorded. A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate association of location and synovitis with cartilage score; and presence of meniscal tear with cartilage and synovitis scores. Bonferroni correction was utilized and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Cartilage pathology and synovitis were identified in all joints. Overall cartilage severity scores were low (median MOCS 1). The median MOCS of the proximal trochlear groove (2) was significantly higher than all other locations evaluated. Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with higher cartilage severity scores and a medial meniscal tear had no association with cartilage severity scores or synovitis. Conclusion Arthroscopic articular cartilage lesions are common in dogs with CCL disease at the time of surgical intervention, although the severity of cartilage damage is mild. The proximal trochlear groove of the femur had the most severe cartilage score in the stifle joint.

Does a fabella-tibial suture alter the outcome for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency undergoing arthrotomy and caudal pole medial meniscectomy?

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.J. Comerford ◽  
M.R. Owen ◽  
M.S. Tivers
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Stifle Joint ◽  
Medial Meniscectomy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Clinical Records

Summary Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of fabella-tibial suture (FTS) on long-term outcome in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) insufficiency and concurrent medial meniscal tear (MMT) that were managed by an open, caudal pole medial meniscectomy (CPMM). Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the clinical records of dogs treated for CCL insufficiency with concurrent MMT by open CPMM, with or without the non-random addition of a nylon FTS according to surgeon preference, during the period of 2001 to 2004. The Bristol Osteoarthritis in Dogs questionnaire was modified for owner assessment of outcome using a visual analogue scale based on several criteria: level of activity, disability, severity of lameness and frequency of lameness before and after surgery. Results: Completed questionnaires from 31 dog owners were received. A FTS was used after CPMM in 22 dogs (FTS group), but in nine dogs (control group) only a CPMM was performed. The median time to follow up was longer in the FTS group (25 months) than the control group (16 months) (P=0.03). There were not any significant differences between the two groups before and after surgery for the following: disability, activity, frequency of lameness, severity of lameness, ability to climb stairs and ability to sit down. Clinical Significance: The placement of a FTS following stifle joint arthrotomy and CPMM in dogs with CCL deficiency and concurrent MMT may not be a significant factor affecting the ultimate surgical outcome, although our study is limited by the non-randomised study design.

Detection of meniscal tears by arthroscopy and arthrotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Plesman ◽  
J. Campbell ◽  
P. Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Rupture ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Rupture ◽  
Medial Parapatellar Arthrotomy ◽  
Meniscal Pathology ◽  
Medial Parapatellar ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

SummaryObjectives: To evaluate and compare detection of meniscal tears associated with cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency by either arthroscopy or arthrotomy.Methods: A retrospective, cohort study was completed with stifles (n = 531) of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Either a medial parapatellar arthrotomy or an arthroscopy procedure was performed and groups were compared for significant differences in meniscal tears detected using logistic regression analysis.Results: Arthroscopy was performed on 58.8% and arthrotomy on 41.2% of the stifles. In total, 44.4% of the examined stifles had meniscal tears. Meniscal tears were found in 38.8% of the stifles examined by arthrotomy, and 48.4% of those examined by arthroscopy. Overall, the rate of detection of a meniscal tear was significantly different (p = 0.019) between the groups, and meniscal tears were observed more frequently by arthroscopy than by arthrotomy (odds ratio 1.54; 95% confidence interval 1.07 – 2.22).Clinical significance: These results suggest that arthroscopy may be more sensitive than arthrotomy for detection of meniscal pathology in clinical patients. However, these results must be interpreted with caution since this was a retrospective study. Randomized prospective clinical studies are required to further test this hypothesis.

Tibial plateau angle in four common canine breeds with cranial cruciate ligament rupture, and its relationship to meniscal tears

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 125-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Fox ◽  
J. L. Cook ◽  
D. B. Guastella
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Plateau ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
The Other ◽  
Meniscal Injury ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
German Shepherd ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease ◽  
Labrador Retrievers

Summary Objectives: To compare tibial plateau angle (TPA) among Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers, Boxers, and German Shepherd Dogs that had undergone tibial plateau leveling osteotomies (TPLO) for cranial cruciate ligament disease, and to determine if higher TPAs are associated with increased risk for concurrent meniscal injury. Methods: This was a retrospective study including 275 client-owned dogs of one of the four aforementioned breeds that received TPLO radiographs between 1999 and 2005 prior to undergoing the TPLO procedure. The TPA measured by the original surgeon was compared among four breeds and analyzed with respect to presence or absence of meniscal injury diagnosed via arthroscopy or arthrotomy at the time of surgery. Results: Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers, Boxers, and German Shepherd Dogs had mean TPAs of 25.9°, 26.2°, 25.9°, and 28.2°, respectively. The TPA of German Shepherd Dogs was significantly higher than that of the other breeds of dogs examined. TPA higher than the mean for dogs in this study did not significantly increase the risk for concurrent meniscal injury. Clinical significance: German Shepherd Dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease had a significantly higher TPA compared to the other breeds examined. Higher TPA did not increase the likelihood of meniscal tears in this study. However, several variables that were not assessed, including the degree of cranial cruciate ligament integrity at the time of surgery and the time between original CrCL deficiency and surgical assessment, could have affected this analysis.

Magnetic resonance imaging for detection of late meniscal tears in dogs following tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Lamb ◽  
M. S. Tivers ◽  
A. Li ◽  
F. Taylor-Brown
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Mr Images ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament

SummaryTo document the use of and to estimate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detection of late meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injury treated with tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA).Medical records of dogs that had TTA followed by stifle MR imaging for suspected meniscal tear and subsequent arthrotomy were reviewed retrospectively. Magnetic resonance images were reviewed independently by an observer blinded to clinical information who classified menisci as torn, abnormal but intact, or normal. Magnetic resonance and surgical findings were compared.Eight stifles from large breed dogs were included. Six stifles had a medial meniscal tear identified in MR images and later confirmed surgically. In the remaining two stifles, the menisci appeared intact in MR images and no tear was identified at subsequent arthrotomy. Lateral menisci in all stifles appeared intact in MR images and were considered normal at surgery. Susceptibility artefacts associated with TTA implants were present in all images but did not adversely affect interpretation of intra-articular structures.Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be accurate for diagnosis of late meniscal tears. Artefacts associated with TTA implants did not prevent evaluation of critical intra-articular structures. Further investigation with MR imaging should be considered when late meniscal tear is suspected following TTA.

scholarly journals Should we offer total hip replacement to feline patients?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Smithers
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
The Individual

PICO question In cats with traumatic coxofemoral injury, does total hip replacement (THR) offer improved outcome when compared with femoral head and neck excision (FHNE) arthroplasty?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed One paper was critically reviewed. It was a non-randomised retrospective observational study Strength of evidence Moderate evidence Outcomes reported THR results in superior clinical outcome and owner satisfaction compared to FHNE in cats Conclusion In cats with traumatic coxofemoral injury, although the evidence is not conclusive and somewhat limited, the literature reviewed here suggests that THR offers a superior outcome in feline patients. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine if there is a difference in long-term outcome, complications or osteoarthritis (OA) development following THR or FHNE in feline patients   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  

scholarly journals DELAY TO ACL RECONSTRUCTION IN PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT PATIENTS IS ASSOCIATED WITH A LINEAR INCREASE IN THE RISK OF MEDIAL MENISCAL TEARS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0004
Author(s):  
David A. Kolin ◽  
Brody Dawkins ◽  
Joshua Park ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant ◽  
Allison Gilmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Linear Increase ◽  
Meniscal Injury ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Text Figure ◽  
Time From Injury

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal tears. Previous studies have shown that secondary meniscal tears—occurring after the initial ACL injury—are associated with greater delays from injury to ACL reconstruction (ACLR), but frequently use dichotomous categories of acute versus delayed ACLR. Purpose: As meniscal damage is likely accrued constantly over time, we investigated the variability of concurrent meniscal injuries as a function of time from injury to ACLR in a pediatric and adolescent population. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients ≤18 years who underwent an ACLR between 2014 and 2018 at one of two tertiary academic hospitals. Outliers were excluded if time from injury to ACLR was greater than 78 weeks. Records were reviewed to assess patients’ dates of injury and surgery. The prevalence of concurrent medial and/or lateral meniscal injury was evaluated at the time of surgery for each patient. Adjusted relative risks (ARRs) of meniscal injury were calculated using Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, and body-mass index. Logistic regression was used to model the predicted probability of medial meniscal tears. Results: 546 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of participants was 15.3 years (S.D., 1.6), and 277 (50.7%) patients were male. Overall, 344 (63.0%) patients had a meniscal tear. 169 (49.1%) tears occurred at the medial meniscus, and 257 (74.7%) occurred at the lateral meniscus (Table 1). Compared to females, males had a greater risk of lateral meniscal injury (ARR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.20-1.77) but not medial meniscal injury (ARR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.77-1.31) (Figure 1). When considering all meniscal tears, time from injury to ACLR was not associated with increased risk of a tear (ARR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01). However, for medial meniscal tears, there was a significant association between time from injury to ACLR, in weeks, and meniscal tears (ARR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03, P = 0.003). A ten-week delay was associated with a 20% increased risk of medial meniscal injury (Figure 2). Conclusion: In pediatric and adolescent ACLR patients, the risk of any meniscal injury was not associated with delay from injury to surgery. However, the risk of medial meniscal injury increased by 2% each week from injury to surgery. [Table: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document