scholarly journals The Community and Patient Partnered Research Network (CPPRN): Application of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research to Promote Behavioral Health Equity

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supp) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armen C. Arevian ◽  
Benjamin Springgate ◽  
Felica Jones ◽  
Sarah L. Starks ◽  
Bowen Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Data Networks ◽  
Social Risk ◽  
Social Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Potential Risks

Objective: We describe the rationale, de­velopment, and progress on the Community and Patient Partnered Research Network (CPPRN). The CPPRN builds on more than a decade of partnered work and is designed to promote health equity by developing partnered research on behavioral health and social risk factors in Los Angeles and New Orleans.Methods: Review of rationale, history, structure, activities and progress in applying community partnered participatory research (CPPR) to CPPRN.Setting: A community-academic partner­ship across Los Angeles County and New Orleans.Design: Descriptive report.Findings: Patient and community stakehold­ers participated in all phases of develop­ment, including local and national activities. Key developments include partnered plan­ning efforts, progress on aggregating a large, de-identified dataset across county agen­cies, and development of an information technology-supported screening approach for behavioral and social determinants in health care, social, and community-based settings.Conclusion: The CPPRN represents a promising approach for research data networks, balancing the potential benefit of information technology and data analytic approaches while addressing potential risks and priorities of relevant stakehold­ers.Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2):295-302; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.295.

scholarly journals Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supp) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Wennerstrom ◽  
Benjamin F. Springgate ◽  
Felica Jones ◽  
Diana Meyers ◽  
Norris Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
New Research

The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) supports patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) including health disparities and engagement portfolios. In 2013, PCORI launched the Pipeline to Proposal (P2P) mechanism to support development of nov­el patient- and stakeholder-centered part­nerships focused on designing clinical CER funding proposals. By providing a tiered structure of successive small contracts and technical assistance, the P2P mechanism encourages development of new research partnerships among diverse stakeholders. As a comparatively new field, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) has few well-delineated methods for engaging patients and other non-scientists in effective teams with academics or clinicians to develop and implement rigorous, scientific research pro­posals. Community partnered participatory research (CPPR) provides a useful frame­work for structuring new partnerships.In this article we highlight the origins, de­velopment, and prospects of three current examples of funded P2P initiatives based in New Orleans and Los Angeles. We outline how these projects – Prisoner to Patient, the NOLA Partnership, and Resilience Among African American Men – use CPPR principles. We also describe how they have collaborated with, and contributed to, a two-way learning and knowledge exchange among members of the PCORI-funded Community and Patient Partnered Research Network. Lessons learned may be ap­plicable to other groups planning to create new partnerships focused on implementing PCOR.Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2):303- 310; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.303.

scholarly journals Community Resilience Learning Collaborative and Research Network (C-LEARN): Study Protocol with Participatory Planning for a Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin F. Springgate ◽  
Armen C. Arevian ◽  
Ashley Wennerstrom ◽  
Arthur J. Johnson ◽  
David P. Eisenman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Community Resilience ◽  
Participatory Planning ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Social Risk ◽  
Social Risk Factors ◽  
Learning Collaborative ◽  
Program Support ◽  
Individual Client

This manuscript presents the protocol and participatory planning process for implementing the Community Resilience Learning Collaborative and Research Network (C-LEARN) study. C-LEARN is designed to determine how to build a service program and individual client capacity to improve mental health-related quality of life among individuals at risk for depression, with exposure to social risk factors or concerns about environmental hazards in areas of Southern Louisiana at risk for events such as hurricanes and storms. The study uses a Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) framework to incorporate community priorities into study design and implementation. The first phase of C-LEARN is assessment of community priorities, assets, and opportunities for building resilience through key informant interviews and community agency outreach. Findings from this phase will inform the implementation of a two-level (program-level and individual client level) randomized study in up to four South Louisiana communities. Within communities, health and social-community service programs will be randomized to Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for multi-sector coalition support or Technical Assistance (TA) for individual program support to implement evidence-based and community-prioritized intervention toolkits, including an expanded version of depression collaborative care and resources (referrals, manuals) to address social risk factors such as financial or housing instability and for a community resilience approach to disaster preparedness and response. Within each arm, the study will randomize individual adult clients to one of two mobile applications that provide informational resources on services for depression, social risk factors, and disaster response or also provide psychoeducation on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to enhance coping with stress and mood. Planned data collection includes baseline, six-month and brief monthly surveys for clients, and baseline and 12-month surveys for administrators and staff.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Situation on Anthrax Based on Ranking Territories by the Degree of Risk

2021 ◽  
pp. 125-132
Author(s):  
S. R. Raichich ◽  
S. A. Saburova ◽  
A. A. Shabeikin ◽  
E. G. Simonova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Animal Husbandry ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Epidemiological Surveillance ◽  
Social Risk ◽  
Social Risk Factors ◽  
Potential Disadvantage ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
State Registration

The aim of the study was to develop a unified approach to a comprehensive risk assessment of the anthrax situation deterioration based on the ranking of territories by epidemiologically significant factors.Materials and methods. For a comprehensive risk assessment of the situation complication, the statistical principles of ranking of the estimated indicators were used. These indicators comprise the presence and activity of soil foci of anthrax, the prevailing soil types and their main characteristics, as well as social risk factors associated with the peculiarities of animal husbandry and the possibility of infection of the population. The proposed assessment method has been tested on a national scale, and its content and results are described in this paper by the example of the Volga Federal District. The materials of the study were federal and regional cadastres of stationary hazardous as regards anthrax areas, an atlas and maps of soils, data of statistical accounting and reporting of Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance, Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography and Rospotrebnadzor.Results and discussion. It has been established that in all constituent entities of the district there are potential risks of the situation deterioration that are associated with the presence of soil foci. In terms of the sum of ranks, the greatest potential disadvantage is noted in a number of republics and regions of the Volga Region. At the same time, the real danger is mainly due to social factors, which include the characteristics of animal husbandry, as well as the degree of susceptibility of the population. The maximum risks are currently identified in the territories of the republics of Bashkortostan and Tatarstan, as well as in the Saratov Region. The study is aimed at improving the efficiency of anthrax epidemiological surveillance in the Russian Federation, and the proposed methodology can be used at all levels of surveillance. 

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

An Approach to Selecting Single or Multiple Social Risk Factors for Clinic-Based Screening

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Steiner ◽  
Glenn K. Goodrich ◽  
Kelly R. Moore ◽  
Spero M. Manson ◽  
Laura M. Gottlieb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Social Risk ◽  
Social Risk Factors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document