What Happens After I Hit? A Qualitative Analysis of the Consequences of Dating Violence for Female Perpetrators

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara L. Cornelius ◽  
Kathryn M. Bell ◽  
Nicole Wyngarden ◽  
Ryan C. Shorey
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Violence Prevention ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Dating Relationships ◽  
Undergraduate Women ◽  
Female Perpetrators ◽  
Dating Couples

Objectives: The primary goal of this study is to qualitatively examine reinforcing and punishing consequences following the perpetration of physical aggression by women in dating relationships because recent theoretical conceptualizations of intimate partner violence have emphasized an examination of such consequences. Method: Participants were 25 undergraduate women in current dating relationships who reported previous perpetration of physical dating violence and completed a qualitative, theoretically based interview on the consequences of their aggression perpetration. Results: Findings demonstrated that violent episodes resulted in both reinforcing and punishing consequences, with 100% of instances resulting in reinforcing consequences for the perpetrator and 76% classified as punishing, which were divided into 15 different classes of outcomes. Conclusions: These findings suggest that dating violence prevention programming could focus their efforts on increasing use of nonaggressive behaviors leading to reinforcing outcomes among dating couples during conflict resolution. This also has important implications for theoretical models of intimate partner violence.

Promising Practices in the Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 849-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa De Grace ◽  
Angela Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Violence Prevention ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Teen Dating Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Teen Dating

To inform practitioners and researchers interested in the prevention of intimate partner violence (IPV) among adolescents, 9 principles of effective prevention programs (Nation et al., 2003) were described and examples of how these principles have been incorporated into existing teen dating violence prevention programs were provided. An investigation of current prevention practices for adolescent IPV resulted in one noteworthy program that has successfully incorporated all 9 principles of effective prevention programming—Safe Dates (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices [SAMHSA-NREPP], 2006). Although Safe Dates serves as a model teen dating violence prevention program, it may not be equally effective across contexts and diverse groups. Therefore, as researchers and practitioners continue to develop and refine programs to reduce adolescent IPV, the principles of effective prevention programs should serve as a guiding framework.

Factors Distinguishing Reciprocal Versus Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence Across Time and Reporter

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110014
Author(s):  
Doris F. Pu ◽  
Christina M. Rodriguez ◽  
Marina D. Dimperio
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Transition To Parenthood ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Couple Functioning ◽  
Female Perpetrators ◽  
Over Time

Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is often conceptualized as occurring unilaterally, reciprocal or bidirectional violence is actually the most prevalent form of IPV. The current study assessed physical IPV experiences in couples and evaluated risk and protective factors that may be differentially associated with reciprocal and nonreciprocal IPV concurrently and over time. As part of a multi-wave longitudinal study, women and men reported on the frequency of their IPV perpetration and victimization three times across the transition to parenthood. Participants also reported on risk factors related to personal adjustment, psychosocial resources, attitudes toward gender role egalitarianism, and sociodemographic characteristics at each wave. Participants were classified into one of four IPV groups (reciprocal violence, male perpetrators only, female perpetrators only, and no violence) based on their self-report and based on a combined report, which incorporated both partners’ reports of IPV for a maximum estimate of violence. Women and men were analyzed separately, as both can be perpetrators and/or victims of IPV. Cross-sectional analyses using self-reported IPV data indicated that IPV groups were most consistently distinguished by their levels of couple satisfaction, across gender; psychological distress also appeared to differentiate IPV groups, although somewhat less consistently. When combined reports of IPV were used, sociodemographic risk markers (i.e., age, income, and education) in addition to couple functioning were among the most robust factors differentiating IPV groups concurrently, across gender. In longitudinal analyses, sociodemographic vulnerabilities were again among the most consistent factors differentiating subsequent IPV groups over time. Several gender differences were also found, suggesting that different risk factors (e.g., women’s social support and men’s emotion regulation abilities) may need to be targeted in interventions to identify, prevent, and treat IPV among women and men.

Victim and Perpetrator Acknowledgement of Intimate Partner Violence and Victim Psychopathology

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110282
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Clements ◽  
Brittanie C. Moore ◽  
Allison Laajala–Lozano ◽  
Karly Casanave
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Experimental Manipulation ◽  
Dating Relationships ◽  
Self Blame ◽  
Frequent Use ◽  
And Coping ◽  
Conflict Tactics

The present study assesses differences between acknowledged and unacknowledged victims in post-victimization psychopathology, abuse disability and coping. Few studies have examined abuse acknowledgment among intimate partner violence (IPV) victims. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use an experimental manipulation to assess changes in acknowledgment among IPV victims. Female undergraduate students currently in dating relationships completed demographic, coping and psychopathology questionnaires, and the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). They then watched a video of an IPV perpetrator who either acknowledged abuse or did not acknowledge abuse. Following the video, participants completed a psychopathology questionnaire and a post-video acknowledgment assessment. Approximately 38% of the sample reported IPV victimization. Only 7.89% acknowledged victimization. Acknowledged IPV victims had the highest mean victimization score but reported psychopathology similar to nonvictims on all subscales except phobic anxiety. Unacknowledged victims reported greater psychopathology, depression, anxiety, and hostility than nonvictims and were more symptomatic overall. Unacknowledged victims reported more frequent use of avoidant coping strategies than nonvictims. These strategies included substance use, self-blame, and behavioral disengagement. Acknowledged and unacknowledged victims reported greater abuse disability than nonvictims, and acknowledged victims reported greater life restriction than unacknowledged victims. Following the video, the number of acknowledged victims nearly doubled, and acknowledged victims reported increased depression. On the basis of these findings, clinicians and researchers should carefully consider acknowledgment as a potential factor in post-victimization mental health and explore ways to increases victim acknowledgment.

scholarly journals Preventing violence by intimate partners in adolescence: an integrative review

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebeca Nunes Guedes De Oliveira ◽  
Rafaela Gessner ◽  
Bianca de Cássia Alvarez Brancaglioni ◽  
Rosa Maria Godoy Serpa da Fonseca ◽  
Emiko Yoshikawa Egry
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Violence Prevention ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Model ◽  
Psychology And Medicine

Abstract OBJECTIVE To analyze the scientific literature on preventing intimate partner violence among adolescents in the field of health based on gender and generational categories. METHOD This was an integrative review. We searched for articles using LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, and SciELO databases. RESULTS Thirty articles were selected. The results indicate that most studies assessed interventions conducted by programs for intimate partner violence prevention. These studies adopted quantitative methods, and most were in the area of nursing, psychology, and medicine. Furthermore, most research contexts involved schools, followed by households, a hospital, a health center, and an indigenous tribe. CONCLUSION The analyses were not conducted from a gender- and generation-based perspective. Instead, the scientific literature was based on positivist research models, intimately connected to the classic public healthcare model and centered on a singular dimension.

scholarly journals Curriculum Review: Relationship Smarts Plus 4.0

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-200
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Chan
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Warning Signs ◽  
Dating Relationships ◽  
Abusive Relationship ◽  
Curriculum Review ◽  
The Relationship

The Relationship Smarts Plus curriculum contains 13 lessons regarding identity, principles of healthy dating, and communication skills. Lessons also include warning signs of abusive relationship and address the issue of intimate partner violence. At its core, the curriculum is built to teach youth how to realistically assess their real and potential dating relationships before making commitments or engaging in behaviors that may lead to unintentional commitments. This is a useful curriculum for educators seeking to engage a teen audience with research-informed activities in an area where teens have few sources of reputable information.

Online delivery of a family-based dating violence prevention program for youth who have been exposed to intimate partner violence: Protocol for an acceptability and feasibility study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Luz Reyes ◽  
Natalie Blackburn ◽  
Eliana Armora Langoni ◽  
Rebecca Macy ◽  
Kathryn Elizabeth Moracco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Prevention Program ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Action Planning ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Online Delivery ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Program Adherence ◽  
Family Based

BACKGROUND Children who are exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) between caregivers are at increased risk for becoming involved in dating violence during adolescence. Yet, to date, few adolescent dating violence (ADV) prevention programs have been developed for and/or evaluated with IPV-exposed youth. One exception is Moms and Teens for Safe Dates (MTSD), an evidence-based ADV prevention program for IPV-exposed mothers or maternal caregivers (moms) and their teens. MTSD consists of a series of booklets that families complete together in a home that include interactive activities to promote positive family communication and healthy teen relationships. We developed an online-adapted version of the MTSD program, entitled, eMoms and Teens for Safe Dates (eMTSD), to provide a delivery format that may: increase program appeal for digitally oriented teens; lower dissemination costs; lower reading burden for low-literacy participants; and incorporate built in cues and reminders to boost program adherence. OBJECTIVE This is a protocol for a research study that has three main objectives: (1) to assess of the acceptability of eMTSD; (2) to identify the feasibility of the research process, including program adherence and participant recruitment and assessment; and (3) to explore the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of two features —text reminders and the creation of an “action plan” for engaging with the program—that may increase program uptake and completion. METHODS Approximately 80 moms and their teens will be invited to complete eMTSD, which includes six 30-minute online modules, over a 6-week period. Moms will be recruited through community organizations and via social media advertising and will be eligible to participate if they have at least one 12–16-year-old teen living with them, experienced IPV after the teen was born, are not currently living with an abusive partner, and have access to an internet-enabled device. Using a factorial design, enrolled dyads will be randomized to four “adherence support” groups (n=20 dyads per group): (1) text reminders and action planning, (2) text reminders only, (3) action planning only, and (4) no adherence supports. All participants will complete brief online assessments at enrollment, after each module is completed, after the full program is completed, and 12-weeks post enrollment. Program adherence will be tracked using website usage metrics. RESULTS Data collected will be synthesized to assess acceptability of the program and feasibility of study procedures. Exploratory analysis will examine the impacts of adherence supports on program completion levels. In November 2021 ethical approval was received and recruitment was initiated. Data collection is expected to continue until December 2022. CONCLUSIONS Online delivery of a family-based healthy relationships program for IPV-exposed teens may offer a convenient, low-cost, engaging approach to preventing ADV. Findings from the study are expected to guide future research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document