Essential Concepts in Traumatic Brain Injury Biomechanics and Neuropathology

Author(s):  
MICHELLE C. LAPLACA ◽  
SUSAN S. MARGULIES ◽  
DAVID W. WRIGHT
Neurotrauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 347-358
Author(s):  
Michelle C. LaPlaca

The study of traumatic brain injury (TBI) encompasses research spanning from injury prevention to clinical interventions, all of which have been influenced by bioengineering. Bioengineering uses quantitative analyses and problem-solving skills to approach the complexity of many areas of neurotrauma research including injury biomechanics, imaging, biomarkers, and data analytics. This chapter presents basic bioengineering concepts, highlights significant contributions to neurotrauma research, and discusses opportunities in the field that may lend themselves to bioengineering solutions. The intention of the author is to promote an appreciation of engineering and to catalyze problem-solving among readers, engineers and non-engineers alike.


Author(s):  
Jiangyue Zhang ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan ◽  
Frank A. Pintar ◽  
Steven F. Son ◽  
Thomas A. Gennarelli

Traumatic brain injury from explosive devices has become the signature wound of the U.S. armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan [1–4]. However, due to the complicated nature of this specific form of brain injury, little is known about the injury mechanisms. Physical head models have been used in blunt and penetrating head trauma studies to obtain biomechanical data and correlate to mechanisms of injury [5–8]. The current study is designed to investigate intracranial head/brain injury biomechanics under blast loading using a physical head model.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Omori ◽  
Liying Zhang ◽  
King H. Yang ◽  
Albert I. King

Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes a significant portion of all injuries occurring as a result of automotive, motorcycle and sports related injuries. Over the years, a large amount of literature has been devoted to an increased understanding of clinical symptoms, pathological evidence and injury biomechanics for such injuries. However, the precise causal mechanism, which accounts for complex mechanical interactions and responses in an anatomical structure as complex as the brain, is not fully understood.


Author(s):  
Jiangyue Zhang ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan ◽  
Frank A. Pintar ◽  
Yabo Guan ◽  
Thomas A. Gennarelli

Ballistic-induced traumatic brain injury remains the most severe type of injury with the highest rate of fatality. Yet, its injury biomechanics remains the least understood. Ballistic injury biomechanics studies have been mostly focused on the trunk and extremities using large gelatin blocks with unconstrained boundaries [1, 2]. Results from these investigations are not directly applicable to brain injuries studies because the human head is smaller and the soft brain is enclosed in a relatively rigid cranium. Thali et al. developed a “skin-skull-brain” model to reproduce gunshot wounds to the head for forensic purposes [3]. These studies focused on wound morphology to the skull rather than brain injury. Watkins et al. used human dry skulls filled with gelatin and investigated temporary cavities and pressure change [4]. However, the frame rate of the cine X-ray was too slow to describe the cavity dynamics, and pressures were only quantified at the center of skull. In addition, the ordnance gelatin used in these studies is not the most suitable simulant to model brain material because of differences in dynamic moduli [5]. Sylgard gel (Dow Corning Co., Midland, MI) demonstrates similar behavior as the brain and has been used as a brain surrogate to determine brain deformations under blunt impact loading [6, 7]. Zhang et al. used the simulant for ballistic brain injury and investigated the correlation between temporary cavity pulsation and pressure change [8, 9]. However, the skulls used in these models were not as rigid as the human cranium. The presence of a stronger cranial bone may significantly decrease the projectile velocity and change the kinematics of cavity and pressure distribution in the cranium. In addition, projectiles perforated through the models in these studies. Patients with through-and-through perforating gunshot wounds to the head have a greater fatality rate than patients with non-exit penetrating wounds [10]. Therefore, it is more clinically relevant to investigate non-exit ballistic traumatic brain injuries. Consequently, the current study is designed to investigate the brain injury biomechanics from non-exit penetrating projectile using an appropriately sized and shaped physical head model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document