Limitations on Public Health Authority: Exploring Preemption

Author(s):  
Derek Carr ◽  
Benjamin D. Winig ◽  
Sabrina Adler
2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 764-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ramos da Silva ◽  
Léo Heller ◽  
Jorge de Campos Valadares ◽  
Sandy Cairncross

The objective of this paper is to identify and analyse the perception of groups of dwellers of Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil, regarding their relationship with the water and sanitation service and aspects of water handling. Participants living in four distinct urban districts of the capital city were interviewed in their own houses and the Discourse of the Collective Subject approach was employed to order the data so obtained. The testimonies revealed the health risk to which individuals were exposed by virtue of: (i) inadequate knowledge concerning the water supply offered, (ii) lack of stimulus to exert their citizens' rights and obligations in relation to the water provided for their consumption and (iii) poor channels of communication between the community, the water and sanitation service and the local public health authority. The study concluded that there is a need to rethink the forms of information provided to the population that are presently adopted by these institutions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Daly ◽  
Jeanne P. Herrick ◽  
Elizabeth X. Maynard ◽  
José T. Montero ◽  
Christine Adamski ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (13) ◽  
pp. 504-511
Author(s):  
Mária Szücs ◽  
Dojna Pintérné Grósz ◽  
János Sándor

Introduction: The diagnosis of cause of death is based on the sequence of diagnoses declared by the physician who completes the death certificate that is processed by Central Statistical Office in Hungary. The validity control of the data requires the active involvement of the public health authority. Aim: The authors analyzed the death certificates from Tolna county in order to elaborate and evaluate methods for cause of death data validity control. Method: Diagnoses of cause of death declared by the physician, corrected by the social statistical review in the Central Statistical Office, and revised by public health authority were compared to evaluate the quality of cause of death data. Results: It was found that 5–10% of the cause of death diagnoses declared by physicians required some modification, resulting more than 1% change in county specific mortality statistics of the main International Classification of Diseases groups. Physicians who reported inaccurate cause of death data were identified. 10 indicators were defined to monitor the process elaborated in the project. Conclusions: Co-operation between the Central Statistical Office and public health authorities to improve the quality of cause of death data should be continued because evaluation of public health interventions needs more and more reliable and detailed cause of death statistics. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(13), 504–511.


2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 762-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Lewin ◽  
Jon S. Vernick ◽  
Peter L. Beilenson ◽  
Julie S. Mair ◽  
Melisa M. Lindamood ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document