The Use Of Statistical Sampling And A Single-Point Estimator To Establish Punitive Fines In Compliance Auditing: A Cautionary Note
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan;"><span style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This paper describes current practices relating to statistical sampling used by auditors performing compliance audits.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>An example audit case is presented where a compliance audit is performed using statistical sampling.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Fines for non-compliance are based upon the sample results.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>While the practice is quite common and generally accepted, there are significant ramifications associated with the use of a single-point estimator.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Approximately half of the time, an auditee will be charged more than is actually deserved.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We explore the shortcomings associated with the use of a single-point estimator and the appropriateness of the use of a one-tailed confidence interval to provide greater assurance that fines are appropriate and reasonable.</span></span></span></p>