THE SERBIAN VOJVODINA AND MONTENEGRO: 1848–1849

The revolution of 1848–1849 had a significant effect on the Serbs in the Habsburg Monarchy, who established their own self-governing entity, the Serbian Vojvodina, within the monarchy. These events also attracted the attention of Serbs living outside the monarchy’s borders, especially those in Montenegro and, in particular, the Metropolitan of Cetinje, Petar II Petrović Njegoš. He wanted to assist his compatriots in the monarchy, and considered this action to be only the first step, albeit a very important one, in the ultimate fight for the liberation and unification of all Serbs within two independent countries: Serbia and Montenegro.

The History of the Habsburg Monarchy (1789–1918) in Romanian Historiography since 1945

10.1017/s006723780001328x ◽

1968 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 303-334

Author(s):

Lajos Jordáky ◽

Keith Hitchins

Keyword(s):

World War Ii ◽

World War ◽

Habsburg Monarchy ◽

History Of ◽

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

Since the end of World War II historians in Romania have given considerable attention to various aspects of the history of the Habsburg monarchy. Needless to say, their researches have been more limited than those of their Czechoslovak and Hungarian colleagues, since they have been preoccupied especially with the internal history of Old Romania, which has little connection with the history of the monarchy. Nevertheless, in tracing the development of the Principalities of Moldaviaand Walachia and, after 1859, of united Romania, they have touched on a number of problems—commercial, diplomatic, and cultural—common to both countries. Their greatestcontribution to the study of the Habsburg monarchy has beentheir work on the history of Transylvania and, to a lesserextent, the Banat, both of which, except for a brief periodduring the Revolution of 1848–1849, were under Austrian administrationup to 1867 and after the Ausgleich incorporatedinto Hungary.

The Rumanians and the Disintegration of the Habsburg Monarchy

10.1017/s0067237800018890 ◽

1967 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 450-476

Author(s):

Andrei Oţetea

Keyword(s):

Nineteenth Century ◽

Social Factors ◽

Historical Development ◽

Habsburg Monarchy ◽

Social Oppression ◽

Points Of View ◽

Administrative Units ◽

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

The problem with which this survey is concerned is the role played by the Rumanians of Transylvania as an integrating and disintegrating force in the Habsburg monarchy in the nineteenth century. This problem is unusually complex, since it can be examined from various points of view and at different stages in its historical development. On the basis of changing economic, political, and social factors, we may discern at least five such stages: (1) the first half of the century, during which Transylvania maintained the autonomy it had enjoyed since the promulgation of the Leopoldine Diploma in 1691; (2) the revolution of 1848–1849; (3) the period of absolutism of the 1850's, during which the Rumanians, who had failed to obtain territorial autonomy within the empire, were parceled out among various administrative units and continued to suffer national and social oppression at the hands of the dominant Magyar classes; (4) the so-called “liberal era” between 1860 and 1867, during which the court beguiled the Rumanians with promises that their national rights would at last be recognized in the monarchy generally and in Transylvania in particular; and (5) the period of dualism and the forced incorporation of Transylvania into Hungary.

‘The power of a country resting in agriculture is always stronger than that based on factories, which will, if indecently proliferated, only produce a large number of beggars.’

Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae – Historia litterarum ◽

10.1515/amnpsc-2017-0025 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 61 (3-4) ◽

pp. 9-26

Author(s):

Jakub Raška ◽

Matěj Měřička

Keyword(s):

Early Stage ◽

Habsburg Monarchy ◽

Specific Expression ◽

Central European ◽

Social Question ◽

Political Group ◽

The Social ◽

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

Early Discussion ◽

This article is devoted to an early discussion of pauperism and the social question in the early stage of Central European industrialisation on the pages of periodicals of the Habsburg Monarchy with an emphasis on Czech journalism. The authors attempt to follow the development of the discussion from the beginning of the 1830s until the collapse of the revolution of 1848. They pay attention to the semantic dynamics of the terms and discourse that were used in connection with mass poverty, as well as the foreign models that contributed to the specific expression of ideas of the causes of the social question and its solutions. The paper studies the development of mass poverty representation at the time from the general Romantic rejection of the modernisation process to proposals for solutions to the social question, which had already been formulated on the basis of affiliation to a political group.

Czech Attitudes toward the Hungarian Revolution

10.1017/s0067237800008146 ◽

1976 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 59-63

Author(s):

Joseph F. Zacek

Keyword(s):

Negative Response ◽

Habsburg Monarchy ◽

Hungarian Revolution ◽

Political Integrity ◽

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

Throughout the Revolution of 1848–1849 the national aspirations of the Hungarians generally evoked a negative response from both liberal and radical Czechs, although, on the whole, the radicals expressed less hostility than the liberals toward developments in Hungary. Of the two groups, the Czech radicals were the least interested in maintaining the territorial and political integrity of the Habsburg monarchy and the more revolutionary in their demands and expectations. Consequently they had less cause to criticize the Magyars. Indeed, after the Habsburgs declared war against Hungary and the Russians openly assisted them in subduing the Hungarian revolutionaries, the radicals openly expressed sympathy for the Magyar cause.

French Salons: High Society and Political Sociability from the Old Regime to the Revolution of 1848, by Steven KaleFrench Salons: High Society and Political Sociability from the Old Regime to the Revolution of 1848, by Steven Kale. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004. x, 308 pp. $48.00 US (cloth).

Canadian Journal of History ◽

10.3138/cjh.40.1.113 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 40 (1) ◽

pp. 113-114

Author(s):

Stephen Miller

Keyword(s):

Old Regime ◽

Johns Hopkins University ◽

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

An American's Account of the Revolution of 1848

The Journal of Modern History ◽

10.1086/236149 ◽

1934 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 294-307

Author(s):

Frank E. Manuel ◽

Titus William Powers

Keyword(s):

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

Bismarck and the Lasker Resolution, 1884

The Review of Politics ◽

10.1017/s003467050002372x ◽

1967 ◽

Vol 29 (1) ◽

pp. 41-64

Author(s):

Louis L. Snyder

Keyword(s):

Political Science ◽

Civil Service ◽

Orthodox Jewish ◽

Jewish Family ◽

And Mathematics ◽

Revolution Of 1848 ◽

Edward Lasker, German parliamentarian, was born on August 14, 1829, in Jaroczin, a small village in the province of Posen, the Polish area of Prussia. The offspring of an orthodox Jewish family, the young man studied the Talmud and translated Schiller into Hebrew verse. At first he showed a preference for philosophy and mathematics but turned later to history, political science, and law. Influenced by contemporary pre-Marxian socialism, he, together with his fellow students, fought on the barricades during the revolution of 1848. It became clear to him after passing his law examinations that he could not expect an adequate appointment in the civil service of reactionary Prussia.

Economics, Society, and Sociopolitical Thought in Hungary during the Age of Capitalism

10.1017/s0067237800015356 ◽

1975 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

pp. 113-135 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Péter Hanák

Keyword(s):

Nineteenth Century ◽

Eastern Europe ◽

Division Of Labor ◽

Central Europe ◽

Industrial Revolution ◽

Habsburg Monarchy ◽

Hungarian Revolution ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Revolution Of 1848

By abolishing feudalism, the Hungarian Revolution of 1848 helped to create the economic preconditions and the legal-political framework necessary for capitalistic development. This made it possible for Hungary to adapt her economy to the market possibilities offered by the Industrial Revolution in western and central Europe and to share in the agrarian boom of the period between 1850 and 1873. The previously existing division of labor between western and eastern Europe and between the western and eastern parts of the Habsburg monarchy continued on a scale larger than before, with the significant difference, however, that this practice now speeded up rather than retarded the development of preconditions for capitalism. During the first half of the nineteenth century the preconditions for capitalism had come into existence in the Cisleithanian provinces at considerable expense to the Hungarian economy.