CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE LASER TREATMENT IN “FLAT” DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA MANAGEMENT

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1511-1516
Author(s):  
A.V. Doga ◽  
◽  
E.K. Pedanova ◽  
D.A. Buryakov ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
Functional Features

scholarly journals Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Modulates Retinal Neuroinflammatory Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3134
Author(s):  
Luisa Frizziero ◽  
Andrea Calciati ◽  
Giulia Midena ◽  
Tommaso Torresin ◽  
Raffaele Parrozzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Metabolic Pathways ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
Inflammatory Processes ◽  
Standardized Parameters

Subthreshold micropulse laser treatment has become a recognized option in the therapeutic approach to diabetic macular edema. However, some yet undefined elements pertaining to its mechanism of action and most effective treatment method still limit its clinical diffusion. We reviewed the current literature on subthreshold micropulse laser treatment, particularly focusing on its effects on the modulation of retinal neuroinflammation. Subthreshold micropulse laser treatment seems to determine a long-term normalization of specific retinal neuroinflammatory metabolic pathways, contributing to the restoration of retinal homeostasis and the curtailing of local inflammatory processes. Optimized and standardized parameters ensure effective and safe treatment.

CHANGES OF AQUEOUS HUMOR MÜLLER CELLSʼ BIOMARKERS IN HUMAN PATIENTS AFFECTED BY DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA AFTER SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE LASER TREATMENT

Retina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Midena ◽  
Silvia Bini ◽  
Ferdinando Martini ◽  
Convento Enrica ◽  
Elisabetta Pilotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Aqueous Humor ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser

Comparative efficacy of micropulse laser treatment of diabetic macular edema

2019 ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
M.Y. Guro ◽  
◽  
Y.Y. Khzardzhan ◽  
V.N. Potapova ◽  
A.S. Balalin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Micropulse Laser

Comparison of ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelda Buyru Özkurt ◽  
Sezen Akkaya ◽  
Sibel Aksoy ◽  
Mert Hakan Şimşek
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: To compare the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection and yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with macular edema following non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: The medical records of 51 patients who underwent intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) injection or subthreshold micropulse laser for the treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion were retrospectively reviewed. Subthreshold micropulse laser was administered with a 10% duty cycle, 100 μm spot diameter, 200 ms exposure time. The patients received an injection or laser treatment at baseline and were, then, retreated as needed and were followed for 12 months. The mean best corrected visual acuity changes over the follow-up and the decrease in the mean central macular thickness were evaluated. Results: A total of 27 and 24 patients were assigned to intravitreal ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser subgroups, respectively. The mean number of treatment was 3.81 of intravitreal ranibizumab group and 1.5 of subthreshold micropulse laser group (p < 0.05). The subgroups were similar with regard to the mean score of best corrected visual acuity at baseline, at 1, 6, and 12 months (p > 0.05). The decrease in the mean central macular thickness was significant in both intravitreal ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser groups at 1, 6, and 12 months than that of values at baseline (p < 0.05). No new ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Our study results showed that intravitreal ranibizumab or yellow subthreshold micropulse laser treatment for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion was not found to be superior to each other for reducing macular thickness and increasing visual acuity for 1-year period. Based on these results, subthreshold micropulse laser may be a useful alternative approach in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

scholarly journals Anatomical and functional outcomes of subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal ranibizumab injection in treatment of diabetic macular edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelrahman ◽  
Wagiha Massoud ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Kamal Elshafei ◽  
Mahmoud Genidy ◽  
Raafat Mohyeldeen Abdelrahman Abdallah
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Implicit Time ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background To compare the therapeutic effects of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) versus intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) both anatomically using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functionally using best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Methods his study was an interventional prospective randomized comparative study. The study included 120 eyes classified into 3 groups: Group 1 included 40 eyes of 28 patients treated by SML laser, group 2 included 40 eyes of 32 patients treated by intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, and group 3 (control group for mfERG) included 40 eyes of 20 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) of more than 10 year duration with no signs of diabetic retinopathy (DR). BCVA measurements, OCT and mfERG were done for the cases before and after interference and were followed up for 6 months Results By the end of the follow up period, BCVA significantly improved by 31% in group 1 vs 93% in group 2 with a statistically highly significant difference between the two groups (p value < 0.001). There was also a significant decrease in central subfield thickness in both groups with more reduction in group 2 compared with group 1 (p value < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in P1 amplitude of mf-ERG in group 2 (p value < 0.002) with no significant improvement in group 1. There was a significant decrease in P1 implicit time in group 2 (p value < 0.001) while there was no significant decrease in group1. Conclusions Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab is a superior treatment modality for DME compared with SML regarding both anatomical and functional outcomes. Trial registration: This study has been approved by the local ethical committee of faculty of medicine of Minia University and retrospectively registered at the clinical trial gov. with Identifier: NCT04332133.

scholarly journals Aqueous humour concentrations of PEDF and Erythropoietin are not influenced by subthreshold micropulse laser treatment of diabetic macular edema

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Midena ◽  
Silvia Bini ◽  
Luisa Frizziero ◽  
Elisabetta Pilotto ◽  
Graziana Esposito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Aqueous Humour ◽  
Pigment Epithelium ◽  
Retinal Pigment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Glass Chip

Abstract Purpose: To determine if aqueous humour (AH) concentrations of Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE)’s biomarkers are modified after subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Naïve DME and healthy subjects were enrolled. All DME patients received SMPL treatments (577-nm yellow light, 5% duty cycle of 0.2 s, power 250 mW), according to study protocol. AH of DME eyes was sampled at baseline and periodically after first SMPL treatment. Control eyes were sampled before cataract surgery. Pigment Epithelium Derived Factor (PEDF) and Erythropoietin (EPO) were quantified with glass-chip protein array. Results: Eighteen DME patients (central retinal thickness ≤ 400 μm on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)) and ten controls were enrolled. The main exclusion criteria were high refractive error, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and neurodegenerative disorders. PEDF concentration was decreased in DME patients at baseline versus controls (P=0.012), while EPO was increased (P=0.029). Both molecules’ concentrations remained stable during follow-up after treatments, compared with DME-baseline. Conclusions: The AH concentrations of RPE biomarkers were significantly different in DME treatment-naïve eyes versus controls. The expression of PEDF and EPO remained unchanged after treatments with SMPL in DME eyes. These data are relevant for future research and applications of SMPL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document