Effects of Environment and Individual Characteristics on Research Productivity: An Empirical Analysis of Korean Public Administration Researchers

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Ho Woo ◽  
Mee-Young Hong
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Fabel ◽  
Miriam Hein ◽  
Robert Hofmeister

Abstract We draw on a new and comprehensive dataset that collects the research output of business economists employed by Austrian, German and Swiss universities. We compute research rankings of departments and identify the leading departments in selected subdisciplines. Moreover, we investigate how institutional design and individual characteristics affect research productivity and draw some conclusions for the training of junior scientists.


2015 ◽  
Vol XVIII (Issue 3) ◽  
pp. 77-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alla Kalinina ◽  
Elena Petrova ◽  
Marina Buyanova

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Gudelytė ◽  
Aleksandras Krylovas ◽  
Tadas Laukevičius

The knowledge of basic mathematics of 178 students of second year of public administration at Mykolas Romeris University was tested. The analysis of students’ motivation and their knowledge of basic mathematics given in school (exams) and survey of the impact of teacher’s subjectivity to the final evaluation of knowledge is provided. Empirical analysis of data shows that students’ motivation has a direct impact to their knowledge and that provided students’ knowledge testing eliminates the subjectivity from the knowledge evaluation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuija A. Turunen ◽  
Sandie Wong ◽  
Laurette Bristol ◽  
Siew Yin Ho

Postdoctoral research fellowships are a recent phenomenon in teacher education and little has been documented about them. This paper presents findings from a study in which the experiences of research fellows in a rural university were investigated. The data were gathered as audio recordings from peer mentoring meetings, notes from these meetings, individual reflective journals, and interviews conducted with six key informants. The analysis highlights that the experience of research fellowships was marked by a need to negotiate four competing, though not necessarily exclusive, demands related to the institute’s research productivity, its research culture and teaching, and personal professional goals. A range of institutional practices and individual characteristics mediated these negotiations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Wills ◽  
Gail Ridley ◽  
Helena Mitev

PurposeThe aim of this study is to investigate factors considered to impact on the research productivity of accounting academics, and identify how the factors were related. The study aims to set itself within an international context of increased workloads, and revenue‐driven research and teaching.Design/methodology/approachA meta‐analysis was conducted of international studies from accounting and related business fields, published between 1988 and 2008, that examined factors influencing the research productivity of academics. A data‐driven approach to thematic analysis was used to synthesise the results, which were categorised into two time periods.FindingsThree clusters of factors that accounted for researcher productivity were found to have had most focus in related studies over the period. These were “Institutional characteristics”, “Intrinsic motivation” and “Knowledge, skills and other individual characteristics”. Hierarchical clusters of factors operating at government, institution and individual levels appeared to influence the research output of accounting academics.Practical implicationsIncreased understanding of the factors that affect the research productivity of accounting academics, and how they are related, has potential to benefit individual researchers and their institutions.Originality/valueModels identified in previous studies have not considered the impact of the relatively recent global market pressures on accounting academics. As the proposed model was developed from a meta‐analysis of many international studies it is likely to accommodate current global pressures better than previous models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document