Magnetism Organizes into a Wave: Meaning for Standard and a Fundamental Model

Five processes controlling the production of soot from gaseous hydrocarbons are distinguished: gas reactions producing radical fragments on which nucleation may begin; nucleation; coagulation; growth; and oxidation. A fundamental model capable of taking into account all these processes is described. The model is applied to the conditions of a practical rocket engine, in which production of soot in the exhaust jet is governed by the rate of pyrolysis of methane in the chamber. Predictions made for these conditions agree with experimental results. The rate controlling processes and key intermediate species are identified.

Download Full-text

A Parsimonious Fundamental Model for Wholesale Electricity Markets - Analysis of the Plunge in German Futures Prices

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.2611079 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Thomas Kallabis ◽

Christian Pape ◽

Christoph Weber

Keyword(s):

Electricity Markets ◽

Futures Prices ◽

Fundamental Model ◽

Wholesale Electricity Markets

Download Full-text

A Fundamental Model of Aluminum Single Crystal Behavior with Physical Description of Kinematic Work Hardening

Materials Science Forum - Fundamentals of Deformation and Annealing ◽

10.4028/0-87849-434-0.577 ◽

2007 ◽

pp. 577-582

Author(s):

Afaf Saai ◽

Laurent Tabourot ◽

Christophe Déprés ◽

Herve Louche

Keyword(s):

Single Crystal ◽

Work Hardening ◽

Aluminum Single Crystal ◽

Physical Description ◽

Fundamental Model

Download Full-text

Crossing the Borders

Tracking Hermes, Pursuing Mercury ◽

10.1093/oso/9780198777342.003.0012 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 173-190

Author(s):

Sergio Casali

Keyword(s):

Fundamental Model ◽

Intertextual Dialogue

All of Mercury’s three interventions in the Aeneid are engaged in a profound intertextual dialogue with Homer and Apollonius. Mercury’s first visit to Carthage (Aen. 1.297–304) echoes Athena’s intervention at Od. 13.300–2, and also the only intervention of Hermes as messenger/emissary of Zeus in the Argonautica (Arg. 3.584–8). This suggests a parallelism between Dido and Aeetes that will resurface again at Aen. 4.563–4 and 604–6. Furthermore, Jupiter’s sending of Mercury to Carthage and the god’s flight recall both Zeus’ sending of Hermes to Ogygia in the Odyssey and Aphrodite’s sending of Eros to Aea. Vergil’s fundamental model for Jupiter’s dispatch of Mercury to Aeneas (Aen. 4.219–78) is Zeus’ dispatch of Hermes to Calypso to free Odysseus at Od. 5.28–42. Finally, Mercury’s dream apparition to Aeneas (Aen. 4.553–70) is modeled on Hermes’ second visit to Priam at Il. 24.677–95.

Download Full-text

The Exact Groundwater Divide on Water Table between Two Rivers: A Fundamental Model Investigation

Water ◽

10.3390/w11040685 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. 685 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Peng-Fei Han ◽

Xu-Sheng Wang ◽

Li Wan ◽

Xiao-Wei Jiang ◽

Fu-Sheng Hu

Keyword(s):

Water Level ◽

Water Table ◽

Catchment Area ◽

River Basins ◽

Two Dimensional ◽

Local Flow ◽

Fundamental Model ◽

Through Flow ◽

Flow Systems ◽

Pass Through

The groundwater divide within a plane has long been delineated as a water table ridge composed of the local top points of a water table. This definition has not been examined well for river basins. We developed a fundamental model of a two-dimensional unsaturated–saturated flow in a profile between two rivers. The exact groundwater divide can be identified from the boundary between two local flow systems and compared with the top of a water table. It is closer to the river of a higher water level than the top of a water table. The catchment area would be overestimated (up to ~50%) for a high river and underestimated (up to ~15%) for a low river by using the top of the water table. Furthermore, a pass-through flow from one river to another would be developed below two local flow systems when the groundwater divide is significantly close to a high river.

Download Full-text