scholarly journals Deficiencies in Project Governance: An Analysis of Infrastructure Development Programme of Multi-Projects

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Waris ◽  
Asadullah Khan ◽  
Ishak Ismail ◽  
Mehfooz Ullah ◽  
Ammar Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Portfolio Management ◽  
Stakeholder Management ◽  
Development Programme ◽  
Critical Element ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Central Focus ◽  
Project Governance ◽  
Management Literature ◽  
Management Approaches

The governance of public sector infrastructure projects became an important topic of interest in the project, programme and portfolio management literature during the last decade. Today, it is becoming a central focus for policymakers seeking to ensure success in selecting, designing and implementing government-sponsored programme of multi-projects. Due to the multiple underlying risks and complexities, the governance of infrastructure programme constitutes a critical element in strategic planning in developing countries. This paper has analyzed infrastructure development programme and revealed shortcomings in the areas of appraisal, decision-making, quality assurance and stakeholder management. Approaches to remedy these shortcomings have been proposed.

scholarly journals Deficiencies in Project Governance: An Analysis of Infrastructure Development Program

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asadullah Khan ◽  
Muhammad Waris ◽  
Ishak Ismail ◽  
Mirza Sajid ◽  
Mehfooz Ullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Management ◽  
Stakeholder Management ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Critical Element ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Northern Pakistan ◽  
Project Governance ◽  
Sponsored Programs ◽  
Management Literature ◽  
Gilgit Baltistan

The governance of public sector infrastructure projects became an important topic of interest in the project, program, and portfolio management literature during the last decade. Today, it is becoming a central focus for policymakers seeking to ensure success in selecting, designing, and implementing government-sponsored programs of multi-projects. Due to the multiple underlying risks and complexities, the governance of infrastructure programs constitutes a critical element in strategic planning in developing countries. This paper has analyzed the infrastructure development program in Gilgit-Baltistan (Northern Pakistan), and revealed major shortcomings in the areas of decision-making, stakeholder management, and role ambiguity. Approaches to remedy these shortcomings have, thus, been proposed.

scholarly journals The hierarchy of public project governance frameworks

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gro Holst Volden ◽  
Bjorn Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Management ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Public Project ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Project Governance ◽  
Internal Focus ◽  
Management Literature ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study public project governance frameworks in various ministries and agencies in Norway, following the introduction of such a framework on the topmost level (i.e. the cabinet) which applies to the very largest projects. Design/methodology/approach The study is methodologically designed as a qualitative assessment of project governance frameworks that apply to state-funded investment projects in selected sectors, based on data gathered through document reviews and interviews. Findings The study finds that all of the agencies have introduced their own project governance frameworks, which are basically consistent with the recommendations from the project management literature and with the cabinet’s overall requirements in Norway. By contrast, only one ministry has taken a formalized role as a project owner. Governance tasks thus seem to be extensively delegated to the subordinate agencies. This even includes strategic tasks such as project selection and portfolio management, and implies there is a risk that public project governance has a narrow and internal focus. Originality/value The paper is a first step toward a better understanding of public project governance as a hierarchical system and the relationship between project owners on three levels, the cabinet, the sectoral ministry, and the government agency.

Governance of Major Public Investment Projects: Principles and Practices in Six Countries

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 90-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gro Holst Volden ◽  
Knut Samset
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Portfolio Management ◽  
Public Investment ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Turn Of The Millennium ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Public Projects ◽  
Project Governance ◽  
Management Literature

This article compares the Norwegian scheme for quality assurance of major public projects with similar project governance schemes in five other OECD countries.1 All schemes have been introduced since the turn of the millennium and seem to be fairly consistent with recommendations from the project management literature. There are also a number of differences between the six schemes, for example, with regard to parties and roles, comprehensiveness, flexibility, organization, and whether portfolio management is covered. It is too early to make conclusions about their relative effects, but the evidence thus far indicates that there is much to learn across countries.

Purchasing Power and Self-Determination: Social Worker Perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Bailey ◽  
Debbie Plath ◽  
Alankaar Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Work Practice ◽  
Social Work Practice ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Purchasing Power ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Management Approaches

Abstract The international policy trend towards personalised budgets, which is designed to offer people with disabilities purchasing power to choose services that suit them, is exemplified in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). This article examines how the ‘purchasing power’ afforded to service users through individualised budgets impacts on social work practice and the choice and self-determination of NDIS service users. Social workers’ views were sought on the alignment between the NDIS principles of choice and control and social work principles of participation and self-determination and how their social work practice has changed in order to facilitate client access to supports through NDIS budgets and meaningful participation in decision-making. A survey was completed by forty-five social workers, and in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with five of these participants. The findings identify how social workers have responded to the shortfalls of the NDIS by the following: interpreting information for clients; assisting service users to navigate complex service provision systems; supporting clients through goal setting, decision-making and implementation of action plans; and adopting case management approaches. The incorporation of social work services into the NDIS service model is proposed in order to facilitate meaningful choice and self-determination associated with purchasing power.

scholarly journals Using project demand profiling to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of infrastructure projects

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1422-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Godsell ◽  
Donato Masi ◽  
Antonios Karatzas ◽  
Timothy Mark Brady
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Management ◽  
Infrastructure Projects ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Utility Company ◽  
Efficient Delivery ◽  
Management Literature ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Demand Profile ◽  
Theoretical Saturation

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the applicability and utility of supply chain (SC) segmentation through demand profiling to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of infrastructure projects by identifying different types of project demand profiles. Design/methodology/approach A three-stage abductive research design was adopted. Stage 1 explored the applicability of SC segmentation, through demand profiling, to the portfolio of infrastructure projects in a utility company. Stage 2 was an iterative process of “theory matching”, to the portfolio, programme and project management literature. In stage 3, theoretical saturation was reached and “theory suggestions” were made through four propositions. Findings Four propositions outline how SC segmentation through project demand profiling could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of infrastructure projects. P1: the ability to recognise the different demand profiles of individual projects, and groups thereof, is a portfolio management necessity. P2: projects that contribute to the strategic upgrade of a capital asset should be considered a potential programme of inter-related repeatable projects whose delivery would benefit from economies of repetition. P3: the greater the ability to identify different demand profiles of individual/groups of projects, the greater the delivery efficiency. P4: economies of repetition developed through efficient delivery of programmes of repeatable projects can foster greater efficiency in the delivery of innovative projects through economies of recombination. Originality/value This work fills a gap in the portfolio management literature, suggesting that the initial screening, selection and prioritisation of project proposals should be expanded to recognise not only the project type, but also each project’s demand profile.

scholarly journals Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Development in South East Asia

2010 ◽  
pp. 152-164
Author(s):  
Suharto Teriman ◽  
Tan Yigitcanlar ◽  
Severine Mayere
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Growth Management ◽  
Economic Restructuring ◽  
Urban Infrastructure ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Kuala Lumpur ◽  
Social Transformations ◽  
Management Approaches ◽  
Impact Of Urbanization

Many South East Asian cities have experienced substantial physical, economic and social transformations during the past several decades. The rapid pace of globalization and economic restructuring has resulted in these cities receiving the full impact of urbanization pressures. In an attempt to ease these pressures, cities such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur have advocated growth management approaches focusing especially on urban infrastructure sustainability. These approaches aim to achieve triple bottom line sustainability by balancing economic and social development, and environmental protection. This chapter evaluates three Asia-Pacific city cases, Singapore, Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur, and assesses their experiences in managing their urban forms and infrastructure whilst promoting sustainable patterns of urban development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document