scholarly journals Gender differences have no effect on recurrent PCR positivity in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Xiankun Wang ◽  
Xingxiang Ren ◽  
Ziruo Ge ◽  
Shuping Cui ◽  
Zhihai Chen
Author(s):  
Jana Strahler ◽  
Hanna Wachten ◽  
Anett Mueller-Alcazar

AbstractBackgroundOrthorexia Nervosa (ON) and exercise addiction (ExAdd) are two phenomena believed to overlap. We conducted a meta-analysis exploring the link between ON and (addictive) exercise behaviors.MethodsA systematic review of major databases and gray literature was carried out for studies reporting on ON and (addictive) exercise behaviors. Random effects meta-analyses were undertaken calculating correlations between ON and (addictive) exercise behaviors. A sub-group analysis investigated gender differences.ResultsTwenty-five studies with 10,134 participants (mean age = 25.21; 56.4% female) were included. Analyses showed a small overall correlation between ON and exercise (21 studies, r = 0.12, 95% CI |0.06–0.18|) and a medium overall correlation between ON and ExAdd (7 studies, r = 0.29, 95% CI |0.13–0.45|). Gender differences were negligible.ConclusionsOrthorexic eating correlated slightly and moderately with exercise and ExAdd, respectively, expressing some unique and shared variance of these behaviors. While this does not suggest ON and addictive exercising to be independent, it does not indicate substantial comorbidity. Future research should focus on clinical relevance, underlying mechanisms, vulnerability, and risk factors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 249-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanuel Alemu Abajobir ◽  
Steve Kisely ◽  
Joemer Calderon Maravilla ◽  
Gail Williams ◽  
Jake Moses Najman

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 902-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natália Miranda Jung ◽  
Fernanda Souza de Bairros ◽  
Marcos Pascoal Pattussi ◽  
Sílvia Pauli ◽  
Marilda Borges Neutzling

AbstractObjectiveThe present review aimed to identify and synthesize literature on household food insecurity with respect to whether the respondent was male or female.DesignA systematic review of prevalence studies followed by a meta-analysis was conducted between 28 August 2014 and 19 October 2014 in seven electronic databases. The search was updated in April 2016. The included studies used experience-based measures to assess household food insecurity. Dichotomous measures of food insecurity were used. Pooled odds ratios of household food insecurity prevalence in women v. men were obtained through random-effect modelling. Quality assessment, publication bias diagnostics and subgroup analysis were also performed.SettingPopulation-based studies (i.e. non-clinical populations).SubjectsParticipants aged 18 years or over.ResultsOut of the 5145 articles initially identified, forty-two studies with a total population of 233 153 were included. In general, results showed that the odds for household food insecurity was 40 % higher in studies where women were the respondent (95 % CI 1·27, 1·54; P<0·001). Besides, subgroup analysis revealed that female-headed households were 75% (95 % CI 49–96%) more likely to be food insecure than male-headed households.ConclusionsOur results confirm the existence of gender differences in reporting household food insecurity. Furthermore, they indicate that households headed by women constitute a segment of the population that is particularly vulnerable to food insecurity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 315-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Cronström ◽  
Mark W. Creaby ◽  
Jenny Nae ◽  
Eva Ageberg

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Miranda-Mendizabal ◽  
Pere Castellví ◽  
Oleguer Parés-Badell ◽  
Itxaso Alayo ◽  
José Almenara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document