scholarly journals Impact of circulating tumor DNA early detection and serial monitoring in the management of stage I to III colorectal cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (S8) ◽  
pp. S315-S315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Bello Roufai ◽  
François-Clément Bidard
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Tumor Dna

scholarly journals Clinical Applications of Minimal Residual Disease Assessments by Tumor-Informed and Tumor-Uninformed Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4547
Author(s):  
Jun Gong ◽  
Andrew Hendifar ◽  
Alexandra Gangi ◽  
Karen Zaghiyan ◽  
Katelyn Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Tumor Dna ◽  
Minimal Residual

Emerging data suggest that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can detect colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific signals across both non-metastatic and metastatic settings. With the development of multiple platforms, including tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic ctDNA assays and demonstration of their provocative analytic performance to detect minimal residual disease, there are now ongoing, phase III randomized clinical trials to evaluate their role in the management paradigm of CRC. In this review, we highlight landmark studies that have formed the basis for ongoing studies on the clinically applicability of plasma ctDNA assays in resected, stage I–III CRC and metastatic CRC. We discuss clinical settings by which ctDNA may have the most immediate impact in routine clinical practice. These include the potential for ctDNA to (1) guide surveillance and intensification or de-intensification strategies of adjuvant therapy in resected, stage I–III CRC, (2) predict treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer inclusive of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and (3) predict response to systemic and surgical therapies in metastatic disease. We end by considering clinical variables that can influence our ability to reliably interpret ctDNA dynamics in the clinic.

An improved method for detection of methylated circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15120-e15120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicky Boulter ◽  
Gregor Tevz ◽  
Betty Yu ◽  
Michelle Chan ◽  
David Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Qpcr Assay ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Assay Sensitivity ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Tumor Dna

e15120 Background: Assays detecting methylated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) hold promise for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but there is a need to develop more accurate assays for early stages. In this study, we examined modifications to COLVERA (an IKZF1 and BCAT1 methylation marker qPCR assay) that added a third biomarker (IRF4) as well as introducing double stranded detection. Methods: Bisulfite converted DNA extracted from plasma collected from subjects undergoing diagnosis for CRC was assayed using either a double-stranded (ds) specific multiplexed qPCR for BCAT1 and IKZF1 detection (Assay 1) and/or a single-stranded (ss) specific BCAT1/IRF4, ds-specific IKZF1 multiplexed qPCR (Assay 2). The unmodified COLVERA test (Clinical Genomics) was used for comparison. Detection of any marker was considered positive. Results: Assay 1 performance evaluated against COLVERA on bisulfite converted DNA from 1453 samples showed an improved sensitivity for CRC detection (93/134 (69.4%) vs 79/134 (59.0%) COLVERA, p = 0.02), but specificity was suboptimal (no neoplasia: 861/1023 (84.2%) vs 946/1023 (92.5%) COLVERA, p < 0.0001). The decrease in specificity resulted primarily from modifications in the BCAT1 assay component (1023 no neoplasia: 60 positive with ss- BCAT1 vs 146 positive with ds- BCAT1, p < 0.0001). Thus, a novel configuration, Assay 2 (ss- BCAT1, ss- IRF4 and ds- IKZF1) was compared to Assay 1 using 189 previously untested specimens. Assay 2 showed a notable improvement in specificity (99/104 (95.2%) vs 93/104 (89.4%) Assay 1; p = 0.0351). Both assays exhibited comparable sensitivities for CRC (41/49 (83.7%) vs 39/49 (79.6%), Assay 1, p = 0.3633). Assay 2 was positive in: adenomas, 9/36 (25.0%); Stage I, 3/7 (42.9%); Stage II, 17/19 (89.5%); Stage III, 6/6 (100%); Stage IV, 7/7 (100%) and 8/10 (80%) unstaged CRCs. Prior COLVERA sensitivity estimates were 9% adenoma, 41% Stage I and 76% Stage II. Conclusions: Targeting both of the non-complementary bisulfite converted strands of selective regions of interest markedly improve ctDNA assay sensitivity for cancer including early lesions while achieving good specificity. Prospective evaluation in a true CRC screening population is now underway. Clinical trial information: 12611000318987.

scholarly journals Clinical correlates of circulating cell-free DNA tumor fraction

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0256436
Author(s):  
Joerg Bredno ◽  
Jafi Lipson ◽  
Oliver Venn ◽  
Alexander M. Aravanis ◽  
Arash Jamshidi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Metabolic Activity ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Cell Free Dna ◽  
Clinical Correlates ◽  
Cancer Early Detection ◽  
Free Dna ◽  
Tumor Dna

Background Oncology applications of cell-free DNA analysis are often limited by the amount of circulating tumor DNA and the fraction of cell-free DNA derived from tumor cells in a blood sample. This circulating tumor fraction varies widely between individuals and cancer types. Clinical factors that influence tumor fraction have not been completely elucidated. Methods and findings Circulating tumor fraction was determined for breast, lung, and colorectal cancer participant samples in the first substudy of the Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978; multi-cancer early detection test development) and was related to tumor and patient characteristics. Linear models were created to determine the influence of tumor size combined with mitotic or metabolic activity (as tumor mitotic volume or excessive lesion glycolysis, respectively), histologic type, histologic grade, and lymph node status on tumor fraction. For breast and lung cancer, tumor mitotic volume and excessive lesion glycolysis (primary lesion volume scaled by percentage positive for Ki-67 or PET standardized uptake value minus 1.0, respectively) were the only statistically significant covariates. For colorectal cancer, the surface area of tumors invading beyond the subserosa was the only significant covariate. The models were validated with cases from the second CCGA substudy and show that these clinical correlates of circulating tumor fraction can predict and explain the performance of a multi-cancer early detection test. Conclusions Prognostic clinical variables, including mitotic or metabolic activity and depth of invasion, were identified as correlates of circulating tumor DNA by linear models that relate clinical covariates to tumor fraction. The identified correlates indicate that faster growing tumors have higher tumor fractions. Early cancer detection from assays that analyze cell-free DNA is determined by circulating tumor fraction. Results support that early detection is particularly sensitive for faster growing, aggressive tumors with high mortality, many of which have no available screening today.

458P Circulating tumor DNA analysis predicting recurrence risk in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S561
Author(s):  
J. Gu ◽  
F. Lei ◽  
X. Wang ◽  
W. Huang ◽  
X. He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dna Analysis ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Tumor Dna

INVESTIGATION KRAS MUTATION IN CIRCULATION TUMOR DNA IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF COLORECTAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 701-707
Author(s):  
Vitaliy Shubin ◽  
Yuriy Shelygin ◽  
Sergey Achkasov ◽  
Yevgeniy Rybakov ◽  
Aleksey Ponomarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Plasma Volume ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Kras Gene ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Droplet Pcr ◽  
Tumor Dna

To determine mutations in the plasma KRAS gene in patients with colorectal cancer was the aim of this study. The material was obtained from 44 patients with colorectal cancer of different stages (T1-4N0-2bM0-1c). Plasma for the presence of KRAS gene mutation in circulating tumor DNA was investigated using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (PCR). KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA isolated from 1 ml of plasma were detected in 13 (30%) patients with cancer of different stages. Of these, with stage II, there were 3 patients, with III - 5 and with IV - 5. Patients who did not have mutations in 1 ml of plasma were analyzed for mutations of KRAS in circulating tumor DNA isolated from 3 ml of plasma. Five more patients with KRAS mutations were found with II and III stages. The highest concentrations of circulating tumor DNA with KRAS mutation were found in patients with stage IV. The increase in plasma volume to 3 ml did not lead to the identification of mutations in I stage. This study showed that digital droplet PCR allows identification of circulating tumor DNA with the KRAS mutations in patients with stage II-IV of colon cancer. The results can be used to determine the degree of aggressiveness of the tumor at different stages of the disease, but not the 1st, and it is recommended to use a plasma volume of at least 3 ml.

scholarly journals Small EVs-Associated DNA as Complementary Biomarker to Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Silvia Galbiati ◽  
Francesco Damin ◽  
Dario Brambilla ◽  
Lucia Ferraro ◽  
Nadia Soriani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Extracellular Vesicle ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Promising Practice ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Dna

It is widely accepted that assessing circular tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients is a promising practice to evaluate somatic mutations from solid tumors noninvasively. Recently, it was reported that isolation of extracellular vesicles improves the detection of mutant DNA from plasma in metastatic patients; however, no consensus on the presence of dsDNA in exosomes has been reached yet. We analyzed small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-associated DNA of eleven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and compared the results obtained by microarray and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to those reported on the ctDNA fraction. We detected the same mutations found in tissue biopsies and ctDNA in all samples but, unexpectedly, in one sample, we found a KRAS mutation that was not identified either in ctDNA or tissue biopsy. Furthermore, to assess the exact location of sEV-associated DNA (outside or inside the vesicle), we treated with DNase I sEVs isolated with three different methodologies. We found that the DNA inside the vesicles is only a small fraction of that surrounding the vesicles. Its amount seems to correlate with the total amount of circulating tumor DNA. The results obtained in our experimental setting suggest that integrating ctDNA and sEV-associated DNA in mCRC patient management could provide a complete real-time assessment of the cancer mutation status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document