scholarly journals Micropapillary or solid pattern predicts recurrence free survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 5384-5393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minjie Ma ◽  
Yunlang She ◽  
Yijiu Ren ◽  
Chenyang Dai ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ib

Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Mitomycin, Fluorouracil, and Cytosine Arabinoside Followed by Oral Fluorouracil in Serosa-Negative Gastric Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206–1

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2282-2287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Nashimoto ◽  
Toshifusa Nakajima ◽  
Hiroshi Furukawa ◽  
Masatsugu Kitamura ◽  
Taira Kinoshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: To evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in serosa-negative gastric cancer patients (excluding patients who were T1N0), we conducted a multicenter phase III clinical trial in which 13 cancer centers in Japan participated. Patients and Methods: From January 1993 to December 1994, 252 patients were enrolled into the study and allocated randomly to adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone. The chemotherapy comprised intravenous mitomycin 1.33 mg/m2, fluorouracil (FU) 166.7 mg/m2, and cytarabine 13.3 mg/m2 twice weekly for the first 3 weeks after surgery, and oral FU 134 mg/m2 daily for the next 18 months for a total dose of 67 g/m2. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Overall survival and the site of recurrence were secondary end points. Results: Ninety-eight percent of patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 or greater lymph node dissection. There were no treatment-related deaths and few serious adverse events. There was no significant difference in relapse-free and overall survival between the arms (5-year relapse-free survival 88.8% chemotherapy v 83.7% surgery alone; P = .14 and 5-year survival 91.2% chemotherapy v 86.1% surgery alone; P = .13, respectively). Nine patients (7.1%) in the chemotherapy arm and 17 patients (13.8%) in the surgery-alone arm had cancer recurrence. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant relapse-free or overall survival benefit with this adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with macroscopically serosa-negative gastric cancer after curative resection, and there was no statistical difference between the two arms relating to the types of cancer recurrence. We do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy with this regimen for this population in clinical practice.

No survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy in nonserous stage IB grade 2 epithelial ovarian cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
S. Grabosch ◽  
J. Berger ◽  
M. Huang ◽  
S.E. Taylor ◽  
J.F. Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Stage Ib

scholarly journals Increased GOLM1 Expression Independently Predicts Unfavorable Overall Survival and Recurrence-Free Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327481877800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Liu ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
Tao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Gene Expression Omnibus ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Golgi membrane protein 1 (GOLM1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein of the Golgi cisternae, which is implicated in carcinogenesis of multiple types of cancer. In this study, using data from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas, we compared the expression of GOLM1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and studied its prognostic value in terms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in these 2 subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results showed that GOLM1 was significantly upregulated in both LUAD and LUSC tissues compared to the normal controls. However, GOLM1 expression was higher in LUAD tissues than in LUSC tissues. More importantly, using over 10 years’ survival data from 502 patients with LUAD and 494 patients with LUSC, we found that high GOLM1 expression was associated with unfavorable OS and RFS in patients with LUAD, but not in patients with LUSC. The following univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that increased GOLM1 expression was an independent prognostic indicator of poor OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.54, P = .002) and RFS (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.14-1.64, P = .001) in patients with LUAD. Of 511 cases with LUAD, 248 (48.5%) had heterozygous loss (−1), while 28 (5.5%) of 511 cases with LUAD had low-level copy gain (+1). In addition, we also found that the methylation status of 1 CpG site (chr9: 88,694,942-88,694,944) showed a weak negative correlation with GOLM1 expression (Pearson r = −0.25). Based on these findings, we infer that GOLM1 might serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker in LUAD, but not in LUSC. In addition, DNA copy number alterations and methylation might be 2 important mechanisms of dysregulated GOLM1 in LUAD.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of upfront surgery in patients with resectable pathological N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Kwang Yun ◽  
Jin San Bok ◽  
Geun Dong Lee ◽  
Hyeong Ryul Kim ◽  
Yong-Hee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N2 Disease

Abstract OBJECTIVES Although the standard treatment for pathological N2 (pN2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is definitive chemoradiation, surgery can be beneficial for resectable pN2 disease. Herein, we report the long-term clinical outcomes of upfront surgery followed by adjuvant treatment for selected patients with resectable pN2 disease. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes for patients with pN2 disease who underwent surgery as the first-line therapy. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify the significant factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS From 2004 to 2015, a total of 706 patients with pN2 NSCLC underwent complete anatomical resection at our institution. The patients’ clinical N stages were cN0, 308 (43.6%); cN1, 123 (17.4%) and cN2, 275 (39.0%). Adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were administered to 169 (23.9%), 115 (17.4%) and 299 patients (42.4%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the respective median time and 5-year rate of OS were 52 months and 44.7%. According to subdivided pN2 descriptors, the median OS time was 80, 53 and 37 months for patients with pN2a1, pN2a2 and pN2b, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was a significant prognostic factor for both OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28–0.52; P < 0.001] and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30–0.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy for resectable N2 disease showed favourable outcomes compared to those reported in previous studies. Adjuvant chemotherapy is essential to improve the prognosis for patients undergoing upfront surgery for N2 disease.

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival varies by neo-adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III rectal cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1630-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.N. van Erning ◽  
H.J.T. Rutten ◽  
H.A. van den Berg ◽  
V.E.P.P. Lemmens ◽  
H.K. van Halteren
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing 4-weekly versus 3-weekly adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine after curative resection of biliary tract cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 345-345
Author(s):  
Shin Nakahira ◽  
Shogo Kobayashi ◽  
Atsushi Miyamoto ◽  
Junzo Shimizu ◽  
Masaki Kashiwazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Dose Modifications

345 Background: Resection of biliary tract cancer, employing pancreatoduodenectomy and major hepatectomy, is highly aggressive. Thus, postoperative gemcitabine cannot be administered employing a routine dosage protocol. We theorized that a 3-weekly protocol (days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy would be superior to the usually administered 4-weekly protocol (days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). Methods: The outcomes of 6 cycles of the 4-weekly protocol and 9 cycles of the 3-weekly protocol were compared in a prospective randomized clinical setting. The primary endpoint was the treatment completion rate, while secondary endpoints were adverse events and recurrence-free survival. Results: We enrolled a total of 27 patients. Only two patients (14%) on the 4-weekly protocol and three (23%) on the 3-weekly protocol (p=0.8099) completed treatment with no omissions and/or dose modifications. Most of the remaining patients (70%) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Relative dose intensities were 72% and 78%, respectively, with the 4-weekly and 3-weekly protocols. Recurrence-free survival rates did not differ significantly between the two protocols. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, the 3-weekly protocol did not produce superior results in terms of completion, adverse events or recurrence-free survival rates as compared to the standard 4-week protocol.

Adjuvant therapy with gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus gemcitabine alone for resected stage II pancreatic cancer: A prospective, randomized, open label, single-center trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15765-e15765
Author(s):  
Tao Ma ◽  
Xueli Bai ◽  
Qichun Wei ◽  
Shunliang Gao ◽  
Bingfeng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Disease Control ◽  
Resected Stage

e15765 Background: Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine has for years been the standard of care for resected pancreatic cancer, the role of adjuvant radiation is still debatable. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as adjuvant therapy for resected stage II pancreatic cancer. Methods: This single center randomized controlled trial was designed to enroll 512 patients with stage II pancreatic cancer that underwent curative-intended radical resection from a large-volume tertiary pancreatic center in China. Patients were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-alone adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant SBRT (25 Gray in 5 fractions) followed by gemcitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events. Interim analysis was planned at the time of 2.5-years’ enrollment. Results: 40 patients were randomly assigned to treatment between Sep 1, 2015, and Mar 31, 2018 (21 to the gemcitabine group and 19 to the gemcitabine plus SBRT group). Of these, one was excluded because of ineligibility and one did not receive any treatment. The median RFS was 12.4 (9.3-15.6) months in the gemcitabine group and 14.7 (9.2-20.1) months in the gemcitabine plus SBRT group ( P= 0.753), with median LRFS of 18.2 (14.6-21.7) months in the gemcitabine group and 13.1 (9.1-16.8) months in the gemcitabine plus SBRT group ( P= 0.333). The median OS was 21.7 (19.5-24.0) months in the gemcitabine group and 16.9 (12.8-20.9) in the gemcitabine plus SBRT group ( P= 0.066). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea or vomiting, and liver dysfunction were all comparable between the two groups. Evaluation of data from the first 40 enrolled patients indicated that the addition of adjuvant SBRT was not associated with either better local disease control or recurrence free survival. And because of failure to achieve the accrual target, the trial was terminated prematurely. Conclusions: Adjuvant SBRT neither provided a survival benefit nor improved local disease control in resected stage II pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02461836.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document