scholarly journals Mental Health Status Among Rural Women of Reproductive Age: Findings From the Central Pennsylvania Women’s Health Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 1271-1279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne M. Hillemeier ◽  
Carol S. Weisman ◽  
Gary A. Chase ◽  
Anne-Marie Dyer
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0240700
Author(s):  
Hyunjung Lee ◽  
Ashley H. Hirai ◽  
Ching-Ching Claire Lin ◽  
John E. Snyder

Background Rural health disparities and access gaps may contribute to higher maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Understanding and addressing access barriers for specialty women’s health services is important in mitigating risks for adverse childbirth events. The objective of this study was to investigate rural-urban differences in health care access for women of reproductive age by examining differences in past-year provider visit rates by provider type, and quantifying the contributing factors to these findings. Methods and findings Using a nationally-representative sample of reproductive age women (n = 37,026) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2010–2015) linked to the Area Health Resource File, rural-urban differences in past-year office visit rates with health care providers were examined. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis quantified the portion of disparities explained by individual- and county-level sociodemographic and provider supply characteristics. Overall, there were no rural-urban differences in past-year visits with women’s health providers collectively (65.0% vs 62.4%), however differences were observed by provider type. Rural women had lower past-year obstetrician-gynecologist (OB-GYN) visit rates than urban women (23.3% vs. 26.6%), and higher visit rates with family medicine physicians (24.3% vs. 20.9%) and nurse practitioners/physician assistants (NPs/PAs) (24.6% vs. 16.1%). Lower OB-GYN availability in rural versus urban counties (6.1 vs. 13.7 providers/100,000 population) explained most of the rural disadvantage in OB-GYN visit rates (83.8%), and much of the higher family physician (80.9%) and NP/PA (50.1%) visit rates. Other individual- and county-level characteristics had smaller effects on rural-urban differences. Conclusion Although there were no overall rural-urban differences in past-year visit rates, the lower OB-GYN availability in rural areas appears to affect the types of health care providers seen by women. Whether rural women are receiving adequate specialized women’s health care services, while seeing a different cadre of providers, warrants further investigation and has particular relevance for women experiencing high-risk pregnancies and deliveries.


2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 1305-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn C. Cannuscio ◽  
Camara Jones ◽  
Ichiro Kawachi ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Lisa Berkman ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanno Ulmer ◽  
Martina Deibl ◽  
Heidelinde Jäkel ◽  
Karl-Peter Pfeiffer

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Symons Downs ◽  
Mark Feinberg ◽  
Marianne M. Hillemeier ◽  
Carol S. Weisman ◽  
Gary A. Chase ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia H. Chuang ◽  
Carol S. Weisman ◽  
Marianne M. Hillemeier ◽  
Fabian T. Camacho ◽  
Anne-Marie Dyer

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol S. Weisman ◽  
Marianne M. Hillemeier ◽  
Gary A. Chase ◽  
Dawn P. Misra ◽  
Cynthia H. Chuang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Parrott ◽  
Julie E. Volkman ◽  
Marianne M. Hillemeier ◽  
Carol S. Weisman ◽  
Gary A. Chase ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document