Relationship between Real Time Ultrasonographic Measurement of Placental Thickness and Biparietal Diameter for Estimation of Gestational Age of Fetus

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Natwar Lal Agrawal ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Biparietal Diameter ◽  
Placental Thickness

scholarly journals Placental thickness: an important parameter in determining gestational age and fetal growth during ANC scan

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4619
Author(s):  
Dipali Kadam ◽  
Saurabh Patil ◽  
Meenal Jain
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Abdominal Circumference ◽  
P Value ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Femur Length ◽  
Biparietal Diameter ◽  
Antenatal Sonography ◽  
Umbilical Cord Insertion ◽  
Placental Thickness

Background: Gestational Age (GA) is one of the most imperative parameters required for proper management in pregnancy. Routinely GA is estimated by sonography utilising Biparietal Diameter (BPD), Femur Length (FL), Abdominal Circumference (AC) and Head Circumference (HC). In any case, these parameters have some limitations. Hence, there is need to find other parameters that may complement the established fetal biometric parameters in predicting GA. The objective of the present study was to assess placental thickness in second and third trimester pregnancies and its relationship with fetal gestational age and its role in detecting LBW and IUGRMethods: A cross sectional prospective study was carried out in three hundred pregnant women between 13 to 40 weeks of gestation, who came for routine antenatal sonography. Placental thickness was measured along with routine parameters. Placental thickness was measured at the level of umbilical cord insertion by two-dimensional ultrasonography.Results: Correlation between the GA by LMP and Placental thickness by ultrasound was done by using Karl Pearson's Correlation(r). The values were expressed as mean + standard deviation. Correlation between placental thickness and gestational age was statistically significant as p value is <0.01. Placental thickness measured in millimetres increases with gestational age in second and third trimester.Conclusions: The correlation between the placental thickness and gestational age was linear and direct. Therefore, Placental thickness is used as a predictor for estimation of gestational age of the fetus in cases where LMP is not known and in detecting developing IUGR and low birth weight.

scholarly journals Second trimester placental thickness: its’ correlation with gestational age, femur length and biparietal diameter

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3568
Author(s):  
Sandesh Ganjoo ◽  
Shalini Devgan ◽  
Ghanshyam Dev
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Uterine Wall ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Femur Length ◽  
Biparietal Diameter ◽  
Positive Linear Correlation ◽  
Minimum Age ◽  
Placental Thickness

Background: Placental thickness (PT) is the easiest placental dimension to measure, yet little is known about the normal PT. The aim of this study was to determine the normal, sonographically measured PT in millimetre (mm) in the second trimester and to determine if this measurement can be adjusted for gestational age for that time and evaluate its relationship with femur length and biparietal diameter of the fetus.Methods: The study was a cross sectional observational study, recruiting 100 consecutive, singleton pregnancies, reporting for ultrasonography (USG) between 14 weeks and 24 weeks of gestation, having undergone at least one ultrasonogram in the first trimester, with known last menstrual period (LMP). The placental thickness was measured perpendicular to the uterine wall, through the placenta at the site of cord insertion.Results: The average age of study population was 24.96 with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.70 years with the minimum age being 18 years and maximum age being 32 years. Regression analysis yielded the following mathematical relationships between PT, Gestational age (GA), Biparietal diameter (BPD) and Femur length (FL) in the second trimester. Y(PT)= 0.9366x (Gestation age)+1.655, R2 = 0.7332; Y(PT)= 0.2872x(BPD)+6.9578, R2= 0.7314; Y(PT)=0.2995x(FL)+ 10.03, R2 = 0.6186Conclusions: PT in present study showed a positive linear correlation with gestational age, FL and BPD in second trimester. Also, it can be concluded that PT may be used as a predictor of GA in women with unknown LMP.

Estimation of gestational age during the first trimester by real-time measurement of fetal crown-rump length and biparietal diameter

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Bovicelli ◽  
Luigi F. Orsini ◽  
Nicola Rizzo ◽  
Patrizio Calderoni ◽  
Francesco L. Pazzaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Time Measurement ◽  
Crown Rump Length ◽  
Real Time Measurement ◽  
Biparietal Diameter

scholarly journals Can a Difference in Gestational Age According to Biparietal Diameter and Abdominal Circumference Predict Intrapartum Placental Abruption?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2413
Author(s):  
Jee-Youn Hong ◽  
Jin-Ha Kim ◽  
Seo-yeon Kim ◽  
Ji-Hee Sung ◽  
Suk-Joo Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Placental Abruption ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Abdominal Circumference ◽  
Biparietal Diameter ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

This study aimed to investigate whether a difference in gestational age according to biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference (AC) could be a clinically useful predictor of placental abruption during the intrapartum period. This retrospective cohort study was based on singletons who were delivered after 32 + 0 weeks between July 2015 and July 2020. We only included cases with at least two antepartum sonographies available within 4 weeks of delivery (n = 2790). We divided the study population into two groups according to the presence or absence of placental abruption and compared the clinical variables. The incidence of placental abruption was 2.0% (56/2790) and was associated with an older maternal age, a higher rate of preeclampsia, and being small for the gestational age. A difference of >2 weeks in gestational age according to BPD and AC occurred at a higher rate in the placental abruption group compared to the no abruption group (>2 weeks, 21.4% (12/56) vs. 7.5% (205/2734), p < 0.001; >3 weeks, 12.5% (7/56) vs. 2.0% (56/2734), p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the differences of >2 weeks and >3 weeks were both independent risk factors for placental abruption (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval), 2.289 (1.140–4.600) and 3.918 (1.517–9.771), respectively) after adjusting for maternal age, preeclampsia, and small for gestational age births. We identified that a difference in gestational age of >2 weeks between BPD and AC could be an independent predictor of placental abruption.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document