scholarly journals Diversi Terhadap Recidive Anak

Rechtidee ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Mita Dwijayanti

<p><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Since the date of July 30, 2014 the Law No. 11 of 2012. One of the things that set new Law No. 11 of 2012 is Diversio. In the implementation, although Diversion is intended to protect children from stigmatization and pressure of the judicial process, but has not been fully implemented because of the Law No. 11 of 2012 are the terms and conditions of the diversion that one of them is the child who did the crime of repetition is not allowed to finish through the process of Diversion. Child in conflict with the law that could damage the system community, especially people of Indonesia and due to the mischief, a child has to deal with the law and go to prison children. Therefore, implementation of the concept of diversion is done with the intention to avoid children from the negative implications of the criminal justice system that is, avoiding the child will enter the criminal justice system and eliminate child labeled criminals against children who have already become victims</em></p><p> </p><p><em> </em></p><p> </p>

Author(s):  
I Made Wiharsa

Diversion of narcotic crime in the criminal justice system for the children. Children in conflict with the law, especially in narcotic cases not specifically regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 on the Narcotics. During this time the children in conflict with the law that is drafted in the Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System for The Children. Criminal punishment against with a certain person started because that person has committed a crime. Children in the case of a criminal act of narcotics criminal sanctions will have a negative impact on a child's future. Referring to the criminal justice system for the children are known to attempt a diversion to divert the child's completion of the criminal case of the trial into a non-judicial process. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to determine the impact of the imposition of criminal sanctions and diversion efforts for children in narcotic crime. Diversi tindak pidana narkotika dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum khususnya dalam tindak pidana narkotika belum diatur secara khusus dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Selama ini terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.  Penjatuhan pidana terhadap seseorang bermula karena seseorang tersebut telah melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Anak dalam hal melakukan tindak pidana narkotika yang dijatuhi sanksi pidana akan berdampak buruk pada masa depan anak. Mengacu pada sistem peradilan pidana anak yang dikenal upaya diversi untuk mengalihkan penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak dari proses peradilan ke proses non peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui dampak penjatuhan sanksi pidana dan upaya diversi bagi anak dalam tindak pidana narkotika.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan ◽  
Hartiwiningsih , ◽  
Hari Purwadi

<p>Abstract<br />This article intends to analyze the use of the jury system in the criminal justice system of Indonesia, jury is a form of lay participation or the participation of lay that community of professional non-law in the the role of judges is absolute in the criminal justice process, in the legal system of modern states today dichotomy between legal systems tradition of common law or civil law is fading and towards the tendency make changes conceptually to the criminal justice system, so that the judicial process drab dominated the role of judges is great where law and justice seems to be the monopoly of a judge, the role of judges research using law approach, conceptual, and comparative law. The results of this study is that morality is the essence of a sense of justice in society, morality can not be separated from the law, because morality is is what is considered correct by the general public, so the public will view the law as something that has no authority and can not be trusted, when morality is left in any decision of the judge in criminal judicial institutions that exist, because the inclusion of jury in the criminal justice system to prosecute local is the living law in automatically entered in every decision, every decision so it is possible to better meet the sense of justice in society.</p><p>Keyword: jury, society, the criminal justice system</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bermaksud menganalisis mengenai penggunaan sistem peradilan jurypada sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia, jury adalah wujud dari lay participation atau partisipasi awam yaitu masyarakat dari professional  non hukum  didalam  peradilan, untuk  memberikan putusan  yang lebih  memenuhi  rasa keadilan didalam masyarakat, untuk menghindari peran hakim yang absolut dalam proses peradilan pidana, dalam sistem hukum negara-negara modern saat ini dikotomi antara sistem hukum tradisi common law atau civil law semakin memudar dan menuju kecenderungan untuk mencampurkan kedua sistem hukum tersebut demi menemukan keadilan substantif dalam proses peradilan. Indonesia tidak pernah melakukan perubahan secara konseptual pada sistem peradilan pidananya, sehingga proses peradilan yang menjemukan yang didominasi peran hakim yang besar dimana hukum dan keadilan seolah-olah aspek hukumnya dalam mengadili, Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa moralitas adalah esensi dari rasa keadilan didalam masyarakat, moralitas tidak bisa dipisahkan dari hukum, sebab moralitas adalah adalah apa yang dianggap benar oleh masyarakat secara umum, sehingga masyarakat akan memandang hukum sebagai sesuatu yang tidak memiliki wibawa dan tidak dapat dipercaya, saat moralitas ditinggalkan didalam setiap putusan hakim didalam peradilan pidana. Memasukkanjury didalam sistem peradilan mampu meningkatkan tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap hukum dan institusi peradilan yang ada, sebab dengan dimasukkannya jury didalam sistem peradilan pidana untuk mengadili dalam aspek <br />the living law secara otomatis masuk didalam setiap putusan, sehingga dimungkinkan setiap putusan lebih dapat memenuhi rasa keadilan didalam masyarakat.</p><p>Kata kunci: jury, masyarakat, sistem peradilan pidana</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan

This article intends to analyze the use of the jury system in the criminal justice system of Indonesia, jury is a form of lay participation or the participation of lay that community of professional non-law in the judiciary, to make decisions which provide a more fulfilling sense of justice in society, in order to avoid the role of judges is absolute in the criminal justice process, in the legal system of modern states today dichotomy between legal systems tradition of common law or civil law is fading and towards the tendency to mix both the legal system in order to find substantive justice in the judicial process. Indonesia never make changes conceptually to the criminal justice system, so that the judicial process drab dominated the role of judges is great where law and justice seems to be the monopoly of a judge, the role of judges becomes absolute in determining aspects of the facts (fact finding) and the legal aspect in judge, legal research using law approach, conceptual, and comparative law. The results of this study is that morality is the essence of a sense of justice in society, morality can not be separated from the law, because morality is is what is considered correct by the general public, so the public will view the law as something that has no authority and can not be trusted, when morality is left in any decision of the judge in criminal justice. Entering jury in the justice system is able to raise the level of public confidence in the legal and judicial institutions that exist, because the inclusion of jury in the criminal justice system to prosecute in the aspect of fact (fact finding) addition will ease the task of the judge also made aspects of morality local is the living law in automatically entered in every decision, every decision so it is possible to better meet the sense of justice in society.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Eva Achjani Zulfa

AbstrakHandling problems through brat children and children who have problems with the law have occurred again when some kids sticking a gamble being arrested at near Soekarno Hatta Airport areas then processed into the judicial process. Diversion is a form of change the process by which a program can only take place on hold pre-adjudication in the criminal justice system. Forms of transfer or diversion of this case are indeed associated with the authority possessed discretion of law enforcement officers. Giddiness has appeared in the process of implementation of diversion by law enforcement officials, the search for forms of application of the criminal case handlingchild has become a growing discourse management. Policy taken toward the institution of criminal diversion not only becomes demand for law enforcement officers, but also must be institutionalized through plain legal mechanisms. It becomes author's concern to create more certain procedures to brighten solve on deviant children in this way


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Akalafikta Jaya ◽  
Triono Eddy ◽  
Alpi Sahari

In the past, the punishment of children was the same as the punishment of adults. This causes the psychological condition of children ranging from investigation, investigation and trial to be disturbed because it is often intimidated by law enforcement agencies. Under these conditions, Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System was born. One of the reforms in the Child Criminal Justice System Law requires the settlement of a child criminal case by diversion. Based on the results of research that the conception of criminal offenses against children in conflict with the law in Indonesia is different from criminal convictions to adults. Children are given the lightest possible punishment and half of the criminal convictions of adult criminal offenses. That criminal liability for children who are ensnared in a criminal case according to the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children is still carried out but with different legal sanctions from adults. Criminal imprisonment against children is an ultimumremedium effort, meaning that criminal imprisonment against children is the last legal remedy after there are no other legal remedies that benefit the child. That the concept of enforcement of criminal law against children caught in criminal cases through diversion is in fact not all have applied it. Some criminal cases involving children as the culprit, in court proceedings there are still judges who impose prison sentences on children who are dealing with the law.


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat

In criminal law, a person charged with a criminal offense may be punished if it meets two matters, namely his act is unlawful, and the perpetrator of a crime may be liable for the indicated action (the offender's error) or the act may be dismissed to the perpetrator, and there is no excuse. The reasons may result in the death or the removal of the implied penalty. But it becomes a matter of how if the Letter of Statement Khilaf is the answer to solve the legal problems. The person who refuses or does not do what has been stated in the letters is often called "wanprestasi" because the statement is categorized as an agreement. The statement includes an agreement which is the domain of civil law or criminal law, so its application in the judicial system can be determined. This should be reviewed in the application of the law, are there any rules governing wrong statements in the criminal justice system. By using a declaration of khilaf as a way out of criminal matters, then the statement should be known in juridical rules. This study uses normative juridical methods, by conceptualizing the law as a norm rule which is a benchmark of human behavior, with emphasis on secondary data sources collected from the primary source of the legislation. The result of this research is that the statement of khilaf has legality, it is based on Jurisprudence No. 3901 K / Pdt / 1985 jo Article 189 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian criminal procedure law. However, this oversight letter needs to be verified in front of the court to be valid evidence, but this letter of error is not a deletion of a criminal offense, because the culpability of the defendant has justified the crime he committed. Such recognition, cannot make it free from the crime that has been committed.Keywords: Legality, Letter of Statement, Criminal Justice System


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 24-40
Author(s):  
Ogechi Anyanwu

The reemergence of the Shari`ah in northern Nigeria in 2000 is reshaping the Muslims’ criminal justice system in unintended ways. This article accounts for and provides fresh insights on how the fate of Muslim women under the Shari`ah intertwines with the uncertain future of the law in Nigeria. Using Emile Durkheim’s theory of conscience collective as an explanatory framework of analysis, I argue that the well-placed objective of using the Shari` ah to reaffirm or create social solidarity among Muslim Nigerians has been undermined by the unequal, harsher punishments and suppression of human rights perpetrated against Muslim women since 2000. A I show, not only does such discrimination violate the principle of natural justice upheld by Islam, but it also threatens to shrink, if not wipe out, the collective conscience of Nigerian Muslims that the law originally sought to advance.


Author(s):  
Stuart P. Green

Talk of “integrity” is ubiquitous in law and legal discourse: Protecting the integrity of our political system has been cited as a basis for anti-corruption laws; preserving the integrity of the legal profession as a principle underlying the rules of lawyer ethics; ensuring integrity in policing and in the wider criminal justice system as a justification for excluding evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution; and protecting bodily integrity as a potential goal for the law of rape and sexual assault. This chapter examines what integrity means in each of these contexts, what these uses have in common, and whether thinking about these various rules and doctrines in terms of integrity rather than other moral concepts leads to any practical difference in outcome. It also asks what the examination of integrity in the law can tell us about the concept of integrity in other contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document