scholarly journals DIVERSI TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
I Made Wiharsa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Type

Diversion of narcotic crime in the criminal justice system for the children. Children in conflict with the law, especially in narcotic cases not specifically regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 on the Narcotics. During this time the children in conflict with the law that is drafted in the Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System for The Children. Criminal punishment against with a certain person started because that person has committed a crime. Children in the case of a criminal act of narcotics criminal sanctions will have a negative impact on a child's future. Referring to the criminal justice system for the children are known to attempt a diversion to divert the child's completion of the criminal case of the trial into a non-judicial process. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to determine the impact of the imposition of criminal sanctions and diversion efforts for children in narcotic crime. Diversi tindak pidana narkotika dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum khususnya dalam tindak pidana narkotika belum diatur secara khusus dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Selama ini terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.  Penjatuhan pidana terhadap seseorang bermula karena seseorang tersebut telah melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Anak dalam hal melakukan tindak pidana narkotika yang dijatuhi sanksi pidana akan berdampak buruk pada masa depan anak. Mengacu pada sistem peradilan pidana anak yang dikenal upaya diversi untuk mengalihkan penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak dari proses peradilan ke proses non peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui dampak penjatuhan sanksi pidana dan upaya diversi bagi anak dalam tindak pidana narkotika.

scholarly journals CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDREN UNDER 12 YEARS OF AGE IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN THE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.

scholarly journals PRIMUM REMEDIUM ACTION SANCTIONS AGAINST CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.

scholarly journals RECONSTRUCTION OF CHILD CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 11 THE YEAR 2012 CONCERNING JUSTICE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BASED ON JUSTICE VALUES

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Akhmad Munawar ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Law

Children who are in conflict with the law are seen to need to be given physical and spiritual protection. Bearing in mind, the Court's decision is more likely to impose imprisonment sanctions. The United Nations in several Congresses has criticized imprisonment sanctions, besides having the potential to cause stigmatization in children, it is also ineffective and does not create a deterrent effect. This study aims to examine and to analyze the implementation of Child Criminal sanctions in the perspective of Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, to analyze the factors that influence child criminal sanctions that are not yet fair. The research question is how the reconstruction of child-based criminal sanctions based on justice is. This research is included in non-doctrinal research (empirical). It used three theories, namely the theory of criminal purpose to analyze the first problem, the dignified justice theory to analyze the second problem and progressive legal theory to analyze the third problem. The results found that the implementation of sanctions Crime against a child in conflict with a law imposed by a prison sentence, the Judge in his consideration emphasizes juridical considerations so that the criminal sanctions imposed on the child are not in accordance with teleological theory as the purpose of punishment. Criminal sanctions against children have not brought justice, among others, because several articles in Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System still have weaknesses. Reconstruction of Articles that hinder the realization of fair criminal sanctions, namely Article 7 paragraph (2) Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 71 paragraph (1) letter e, Article 79 paragraph (1) and Article 81 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 11 the year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of the implementation of diversion on children who conflict with the law at the level of the state court in gorontalo province

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizal Lampatta ◽  
Herlina Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
State Court ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Psychological Condition ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Law

Diversion is a step or legal remedy aimed specifically at children who are in conflict with the law. As perpetrators of criminal acts, children need to be treated differently from adults. This is due to the psychological condition of children who are considered unable to accept criminal sanctions. Even children who have committed criminal acts, Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Children continue to provide collateral in the form of diversion efforts so that children avoid criminal prosecution. Diversion is carried out at the police, attorney and court levels. Not all cases of child offenders who enter the PN level can be diversified because there are already rules in the SPPA Law, Perma No. 4 of 2014 and PP. 65 of 2015. Likewise in the implementation of diversion at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province, some were successful and some were not. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of diversion to child offenders at court level in Gorontalo Province. As well as to find out the obstacles in the implementation of diversion against child offenders at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN SANKSI TINDAKAN PADA ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN BULLYING SEHINGGA MENYEBABKAN TRAUMA PADA KORBAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evita Monica Chrysan ◽  
Yiska Marva Rohi ◽  
Dini Saputri Fredyandani Apituley
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Physical Violence ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Government

AbstractBullying or so-called harassment is an act where one or more people try to hurt or control another person by means of physical violence, such as hitting, pushing, and so on as well as verbal bullying such as insulting, shouting, using harsh words, post things that can intimidate someone on social media or anywhere. Acts of bullying generally occur in school children who are underage. Bullying is a matter that must be considered and needs to be treated seriously, considering that the action can endanger the mental and life of a person if done in an excessive manner as well as each person has a limit on themselves regarding the level of bully that exceeds that limit. The regulation of legislation governing criminal sanctions for children is Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. Therefore the bullying action that has a negative impact is a criminal offense and it is necessary to apply sanctions on the bullying child in a strict manner which not only causes a deterrent effect but the sanction is sought in order to improve behavior considering that a child is the nation's next generation as well as the application of action sanctions for children regulated in Article 82 paragraph (1) letter e of Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, namely the obliga-tion to attend formal education and/or training provided by the government or private bodies.Keywords: application of sanction actions on children; bullying; criminal justice system for childrenAbstrakBullying atau disebut perundungan adalah tindakan dimana satu orang atau lebih mencoba untuk menyakiti atau mengontrol orang lain dengan cara kekerasan baik menyakiti dalam bentuk fisik, seperti memukul, mendorong, dan sebagainya serta bullying dalam bentuk verbal seperti menghina, membentak, menggunakan kata-kata kasar, memposting hal yang dapat mengintimidasi seseorang di sosial media atau di tempat manapun. Tindakan bullying pada umumnya terjadi pada anak sekolah yang masih di bawah umur. Tindakan bullying menjadi hal yang harus diperhatikan serta perlu mendapat penanganan serius mengingat tindakan tersebut dapat membahayakan mental serta nyawa seseorang apabila dilakukan dengan cara berlebihan sebagaimana pula tiap-tiap orang memiliki batasan pada diri masing-masing mengenai tingkatan bully yang melampaui batas tersebut. Regulasi dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur sanksi pidana bagi anak adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Maka dari itu tindakan bullying yang menimbulkan dampak negatif tersebut merupakan suatu tindak pidana dan diperlukan penerapan sanksi pada anak pelaku bullying secara tegas yang bukan saja menimbulkan efek jera namun sanksi tersebut diupayakan agar dapat memperbaiki perilaku mengingat seorang anak adalah generasi penerus bangsa seperti halnya penerapan sanksi tindakan pada anak yang diatur dalam Pasal 82 ayat (1) huruf e Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yaitu kewajiban mengikuti pendidikan formal dan/atau pelatihan yang diadakan oleh pemerintah atau badan swasta.Kata kunci: bullying; penerapan sanksi tindakan pada anak; sistem peradilan pidana anak

scholarly journals TRANSPLANTASI SISTEM PERADILAN JURY PADA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANAINDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan ◽  
Hartiwiningsih , ◽  
Hari Purwadi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Lay Participation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Sense Of Justice

<p>Abstract<br />This article intends to analyze the use of the jury system in the criminal justice system of Indonesia, jury is a form of lay participation or the participation of lay that community of professional non-law in the the role of judges is absolute in the criminal justice process, in the legal system of modern states today dichotomy between legal systems tradition of common law or civil law is fading and towards the tendency make changes conceptually to the criminal justice system, so that the judicial process drab dominated the role of judges is great where law and justice seems to be the monopoly of a judge, the role of judges research using law approach, conceptual, and comparative law. The results of this study is that morality is the essence of a sense of justice in society, morality can not be separated from the law, because morality is is what is considered correct by the general public, so the public will view the law as something that has no authority and can not be trusted, when morality is left in any decision of the judge in criminal judicial institutions that exist, because the inclusion of jury in the criminal justice system to prosecute local is the living law in automatically entered in every decision, every decision so it is possible to better meet the sense of justice in society.</p><p>Keyword: jury, society, the criminal justice system</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bermaksud menganalisis mengenai penggunaan sistem peradilan jurypada sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia, jury adalah wujud dari lay participation atau partisipasi awam yaitu masyarakat dari professional  non hukum  didalam  peradilan, untuk  memberikan putusan  yang lebih  memenuhi  rasa keadilan didalam masyarakat, untuk menghindari peran hakim yang absolut dalam proses peradilan pidana, dalam sistem hukum negara-negara modern saat ini dikotomi antara sistem hukum tradisi common law atau civil law semakin memudar dan menuju kecenderungan untuk mencampurkan kedua sistem hukum tersebut demi menemukan keadilan substantif dalam proses peradilan. Indonesia tidak pernah melakukan perubahan secara konseptual pada sistem peradilan pidananya, sehingga proses peradilan yang menjemukan yang didominasi peran hakim yang besar dimana hukum dan keadilan seolah-olah aspek hukumnya dalam mengadili, Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa moralitas adalah esensi dari rasa keadilan didalam masyarakat, moralitas tidak bisa dipisahkan dari hukum, sebab moralitas adalah adalah apa yang dianggap benar oleh masyarakat secara umum, sehingga masyarakat akan memandang hukum sebagai sesuatu yang tidak memiliki wibawa dan tidak dapat dipercaya, saat moralitas ditinggalkan didalam setiap putusan hakim didalam peradilan pidana. Memasukkanjury didalam sistem peradilan mampu meningkatkan tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap hukum dan institusi peradilan yang ada, sebab dengan dimasukkannya jury didalam sistem peradilan pidana untuk mengadili dalam aspek <br />the living law secara otomatis masuk didalam setiap putusan, sehingga dimungkinkan setiap putusan lebih dapat memenuhi rasa keadilan didalam masyarakat.</p><p>Kata kunci: jury, masyarakat, sistem peradilan pidana</p>

scholarly journals The Weakness Of The Law In The Republic Of Indonesia Number 18 Year 2003 On The Advocate

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Public Confidence ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Fact Finding ◽  
Sense Of Justice

This article intends to analyze the use of the jury system in the criminal justice system of Indonesia, jury is a form of lay participation or the participation of lay that community of professional non-law in the judiciary, to make decisions which provide a more fulfilling sense of justice in society, in order to avoid the role of judges is absolute in the criminal justice process, in the legal system of modern states today dichotomy between legal systems tradition of common law or civil law is fading and towards the tendency to mix both the legal system in order to find substantive justice in the judicial process. Indonesia never make changes conceptually to the criminal justice system, so that the judicial process drab dominated the role of judges is great where law and justice seems to be the monopoly of a judge, the role of judges becomes absolute in determining aspects of the facts (fact finding) and the legal aspect in judge, legal research using law approach, conceptual, and comparative law. The results of this study is that morality is the essence of a sense of justice in society, morality can not be separated from the law, because morality is is what is considered correct by the general public, so the public will view the law as something that has no authority and can not be trusted, when morality is left in any decision of the judge in criminal justice. Entering jury in the justice system is able to raise the level of public confidence in the legal and judicial institutions that exist, because the inclusion of jury in the criminal justice system to prosecute in the aspect of fact (fact finding) addition will ease the task of the judge also made aspects of morality local is the living law in automatically entered in every decision, every decision so it is possible to better meet the sense of justice in society.

scholarly journals Diversi Terhadap Recidive Anak

Rechtidee ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Mita Dwijayanti
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Law

<p><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Since the date of July 30, 2014 the Law No. 11 of 2012. One of the things that set new Law No. 11 of 2012 is Diversio. In the implementation, although Diversion is intended to protect children from stigmatization and pressure of the judicial process, but has not been fully implemented because of the Law No. 11 of 2012 are the terms and conditions of the diversion that one of them is the child who did the crime of repetition is not allowed to finish through the process of Diversion. Child in conflict with the law that could damage the system community, especially people of Indonesia and due to the mischief, a child has to deal with the law and go to prison children. Therefore, implementation of the concept of diversion is done with the intention to avoid children from the negative implications of the criminal justice system that is, avoiding the child will enter the criminal justice system and eliminate child labeled criminals against children who have already become victims</em></p><p> </p><p><em> </em></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals The Reasonable Person for Our Time for Reasonableness in a Heterogeneous Society

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Ceilia Divakaran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Social Deprivation ◽  
Reasonable Person ◽  
High Court ◽  
Legal Precedent ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Sentencing Outcomes

The cases of Bugmy and Munda decided by the High Court in 2013 raised the impact of social deprivation on Aboriginal defendants, in that it mars the development of an individual exposed to alcohol and alcohol-fuelled violence, and that full weight must be given to this in sentencing considerations. This significant legal precedent, in the backdrop of Aboriginal over-representation in the criminal justice system, invites the question of the relevance of the characterisation of the reasonable man in the law of provocation and delivery of equal justice, in a culturally heterogeneous society such as Australia. The case for constructing a contemporary reasonable man, clothed in Aboriginal identity, for equitable sentencing outcomes for Aboriginal defendants is explored.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Alternative Solutions

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan sanksi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan permasalahan penelitian, Pertama, Bagaimana penerapan Sanksi Pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak? Kedua, Bagaimanakah hambatan-hambatan apa yang ditemukan dalam penerapan Sanksi pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empirik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama, Penerapan sanksi pidana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradila Pidana Anak bahwa Penegak mencari alternatif penyelesaian terbaik bagi kepentingan anak. Kedua, Hambatannya yaitu belum adanya persamaan persfektif dalam penanganan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum di antara para penegak hukum serta hambatan dari faktor masyarakat yaitu banyak masyarakat yang belum mengerti tentang peraturan undang-undang yang berhubungan dengan anak. This study aims to analyze the application of sanctions based on the Child Criminal Justice System Law with research issues, First, How is the application of Criminal Sanctions and Actions According to Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Child Criminal Justice System? Second, what are the obstacles found in the application of criminal sanctions and actions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. The research method uses normative legal research and empirical legal research. The results showed, First, the application of criminal sanctions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children that the Enforcement Seekers seek the best alternative solutions for the interests of children. Second, the obstacle is the lack of equality in the perspective of handling children in conflict with the law among law enforcers as well as obstacles from community factors, namely that many people do not understand the laws relating to children

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document