scholarly journals Reliability Express Control of the Gate Dielectric of Semiconductor Devices

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-313
Author(s):  
V. A. Solodukha ◽  
G. G. Chigir ◽  
V. A. Pilipenko ◽  
V. A. Filipenya ◽  
V. A. Gorushko

The key element determining stability of the semiconductor devices is a gate dielectric. As its thickness reduces in the process of scaling the combined volume of factors determining its electrophysical properties increases. The purpose of this paper is development of the control express method of the error-free running time of the gate dielectric and study the influence of the rapid thermal treatment of the initial silicon wafers and gate dielectric on its reliability.The paper proposes a model for evaluation of the reliability indicators of the gate dielectrics as per the trial results of the test MDS-structures by means of applying of the ramp-increasing voltage on the gate up to the moment of the structure breakdown at various velocities of the voltage sweep with measurement of the IV-parameters. The proposed model makes it possible to realize the express method of the reliability evaluation of the thin dielectrics right in the production process of the integrated circuits.On the basis of this method study of the influence of the rapid thermal treatment of the initial silicon wafers of the KEF 4.5, KDB 12 wafers and formed on them by means of the pyrogenic oxidation of the gate dielectric for the error-free running time were performed. It is shown, that rapid thermal treatment of the initial silicon wafers with their subsequent oxidation results in increase of the error-free running time of the gate dielectric on average from 12.9 to 15.9 years (1.23 times greater). Thermal treatment of the initial silicon wafers and gate dielectric makes it possible to expand the error-free running time up to 25.2 years, i.e.1.89 times more, than in the standard process of the pyrogenic oxidation and 1.5 times more, than under application of the rapid thermal treatment of the initial silicon wafers only.

Author(s):  
V. A. Pilipenko ◽  
V. A. Solodukha ◽  
V. A. Gorushko ◽  
A. A. Omelchenko

Quality and reliability of integrated circuits to a great extent depend on the surface condition of silicon wafers. In view of this, great attention is paid on the aspects of their preparation prior to their formation. It is of significant interest to study the possibility of applying rapid thermal treatment for solid phase re-crystallization of a mechanically disrupted layer of the wafer working side. The objective of this work was to establish the behavior regularities of a mechanically disrupted layer subjected to rapid thermal treatment with 2 s light pulses. As samples, there were used the silicon wafers with a diameter of 100 mm, grade KDB 12 and KEF 4.5, orientation <100> after chemical-mechanical polishing subjected to rapid thermal treatment during 7 s, which ensured their heating up to 1100 °C and without treatment. The application of the methods of Auger-spectroscopy, spectral ellipsometry, X-ray diffraction made it possible to state that such treatment increases the structural flawlessness of the surface layer of silicon wafers due to a decrease in the mechanically disrupted layer, thus ensuring obtaining the atomic-flat surface.


Author(s):  
J. V. Maskowitz ◽  
W. E. Rhoden ◽  
D. R. Kitchen ◽  
R. E. Omlor ◽  
P. F. Lloyd

The fabrication of the aluminum bridge test vehicle for use in the crystallographic studies of electromigration involves several photolithographic processes, some common, while others quite unique. It is most important to start with a clean wafer of known orientation. The wafers used are 7 mil thick boron doped silicon. The diameter of the wafer is 1.5 inches with a resistivity of 10-20 ohm-cm. The crystallographic orientation is (111).Initial attempts were made to both drill and laser holes in the silicon wafers then back fill with photoresist or mounting wax. A diamond tipped dentist burr was used to successfully drill holes in the wafer. This proved unacceptable in that the perimeter of the hole was cracked and chipped. Additionally, the minimum size hole realizable was > 300 μm. The drilled holes could not be arrayed on the wafer to any extent because the wafer would not stand up to the stress of multiple drilling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document